Zutty wrote:
Its not fair to discriminate against someone based on their ability with English.
richk67 wrote:
And no, discrimination is NEVER fair, which is why for many things discrimination is illegal.
Both of you are missing the point. IMO, no "discrimination" has taken place at all.
Let me point out my first reply, which seems to have been spurred further postings.
Firstly, posting with such an amount of typing errors is extremely "impolite" against other users, and in turn, many wouldn´t read something like this at all, yet answer such a post. But indeed, using a spell-checker would be an easy relief.
Secondly, apart from the grammatical shortcomings of that post (like DaleStan, I always find something like this being an indication of "carelessness and sloppyness at thinking"), the tone was sort of "demanding" (others seem to feel alike), and unpleasantly "teaching", and, together with the aforementioned "impoliteness", postings like this are getting increasingly on my nerves, the longer I´m active on the net, but I´m not always in the mood to ignore them.
richk67 wrote:
I do not associate with the arrogant "we" in Dalestan's quote.
Well, ditto for the "we". Especially, because "we" know something more about the Middle East than this:
davidx123 wrote:yes i know,you was thinking only on terrisim while you reding middle east.
Having to read something like this is annoying at least.
And o/c we don´t
davidx123 wrote:
need to add on industry of turims,and maybe also a fertilizer (israel know for pospath indutry).
Why should we have a
need for this?
Last, but not least:
Zutty wrote:
Good luck with your set
I wouldn´t describe it as "his set" because
davidx123 wrote:
i need drwers and coders!
So ...
EOD
regards
Michael