Ok fine whatever, So i was wrong and though electric was rlly fast but not very powerful and thought diesell was slow on purpose.michael blunck wrote:This isn´t "future" at all but highly conventional:
Speed : 280 Km\h
Power : 3,200 HP
Designed : 2012Maybe it escaped your attention that there are already faster and more powerful trains since decades?Speed : 315 Km\h
Designed : 2018
Even in the "future" this will be as unrealistic as it is today. Electric drive offers the most power at all, for single locomotives it´s in the 9000 hp area, and modern EMUs often offer a total power of more than 10,000 hp.Electric - Fastest but Not As powerful
Diesel - Would Provide the Most power but the Least Speed
OTOH, even modern diesels (with asynchronous AC drives) offer significantly less power, simply because it has to be generated "on-board" but maximum allowable axle weight puts a limit to it, whereas electrics get as much power they need via the catenary system. And BTW, speed is depending from gearing, i.e. only because being a "diesel" doesn´t mean to be inevitably slower. In fact, the only disadvantage of electric traction is the initial cost of catenary. However, with even higher prizes for diesel fuel this drawback will quickly fade away, and even today it´s not in existence in many parts of the world where the main railway lines are already electrified.
Had been experimented with in the past and found totally unsuitable for the needs of railway usage. Will not be used "in the future" again for sure.Gas Turbine
These look quite outdated (1980s) but not "futuristic" (whatever this means).Attachments:
Well, at least the brand name is slightly interesting, but also not very futuristic either, given an age of almost 2000 years of the real thing. Maybe it would be an idea to make your trains 7 parts, according to the 7 parts of the original.Camasutra![]()
regards
Michael
Anyways, as for the gas tubine, the only reason why it was failure is becuz turbines get damaged when stoped and started frequntly and also they dont have the chance to Spin b4 the train gets moving. I have thought of an idea to prevent that problem from occuring.
The Turbine left in Neutral and a Starter will spin it using auxxilery power, while tahts happening teh Burners or whatever are warmed up to get going, then a Sensor will detect when the Turbine is spining fast enough to be kept going by the burners. When the train needs to go up hill or something a large gear box will switch to an apropite gear so the engine wont kill it self. When the train needs to stop, the Turbine is Put in neutral to spin freely but will still be connected to a Small Generator to Power the Starters.
It might seem a little complicated but at least this idea will allow it run smoothly with less repairs.
Also, Im a ammy at TTD spriting so Im not good at making them look futureistic. and btw, as far as I know, most HS speed trains dont have the capibilty to haul cargo, they my have the power but that power is put forward into speed for , well, High Speed Trains! : P
Dont worry, ill come back after I have some better ideas, and I cant make the Super Trains rlly rlly fast, as then what good would the Maglevs be? Super trains are ment to be fast and Powerful for both Passenger transport and Cargo Transport .
And although your comment did tick me off a bit, it did help so i could figure out better specs for newer trains.