The point is: you must then ask that of ALL authors. You see how it's faring right now...Purno wrote:Well, AFAIK, we can always give additional rights for any 'commercial' OpenTTD purposes that pop up in mind later, can't we?
OpenGFX copyright discussion
Moderator: Graphics Moderators
- planetmaker
- OpenTTD Developer
- Posts: 9432
- Joined: 07 Nov 2007 22:44
- Location: Sol d
Re: OpenGFX copyright discussion
OpenTTD: manual | online content | translations | Wanted contributions and patches
#openttdcoop: blog | wiki | public server | DevZone | NewGRF web translator
DevZone - home of the free NewGRFs: OpenSFX | OpenMSX | OpenGFX | Swedish Rails | OpenGFX+ Trains|RV|Industries|Airports|Landscape | NML
Re: OpenGFX copyright discussion
You only need to ask the authors of the graphics you want to use...
Contributor to the The 2cc Set and Dutch Trainset. Inventor of the Metro concept. Retired Graphics Artist.

Download TT | Latest TTDPatch | OpenTTD | OpenTTDCoop | BaNaNaS: OpenTTD content system | 2048² OTTD scenario of the Netherlands
GRF Codec | GRF Crawler | GRF Maker | Usefull graphics & tools sites | NML Documentation Wiki | NFO Documentation Wiki
All my graphics are licensed under GPL. "Always remember you're unique, just like everyone else."
Download TT | Latest TTDPatch | OpenTTD | OpenTTDCoop | BaNaNaS: OpenTTD content system | 2048² OTTD scenario of the Netherlands
GRF Codec | GRF Crawler | GRF Maker | Usefull graphics & tools sites | NML Documentation Wiki | NFO Documentation Wiki
All my graphics are licensed under GPL. "Always remember you're unique, just like everyone else."
- orudge
- Administrator
- Posts: 25223
- Joined: 26 Jan 2001 20:18
- Skype: orudge
- Location: Banchory, UK
- Contact:
Re: OpenGFX copyright discussion
Well, OpenGFX is intended to be a bundle, and trying to track down each individual author in, say, 5 years time because you want to sell a mug seems to be a bit much. The decision needs to be made now. (Really, it should have been made before the project began, but it's a bit late for that now.)
I'm still firmly of the believe that we should go with a free licence, which does not prohibit commercial distribution. The GPL or CC-BY-SA 3.0 would seem to be sensible choices, if everybody can make up their mind which one is preferred.
I'm still firmly of the believe that we should go with a free licence, which does not prohibit commercial distribution. The GPL or CC-BY-SA 3.0 would seem to be sensible choices, if everybody can make up their mind which one is preferred.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot] and 11 guests