North American Renewal Set - Ver. 1.0 Released! - 04/04/06

DanMacK · Post by **DanMacK** » 05 Jul 2005 20:10

I never noticed that, but now that you mention it... lol

DanMacK · Post by **DanMacK** » 07 Jul 2005 05:13

Couple more locos for the set here - a GP9 and an F40PH

Purno · Post by **Purno** » 07 Jul 2005 06:20

They look nice, I especially like that lower one

uzurpator · Post by **uzurpator** » 07 Jul 2005 07:56

That GP9 is loads better then the current one in USset...

DanMacK · Post by **DanMacK** » 07 Jul 2005 08:01

It keeps getting refined with each incarnation... lol The C&NW and C&O ones are about on par with this one I'd say

DanMacK · Post by **DanMacK** » 07 Jul 2005 08:59

Decided to add the Doodlebug for early cheap passenger service. It and the mail variant match their old-style counterparts. Also here is the final old-style tanker, an oil variant. The white one is for food, the CC w/yellow stripe for goods. The Log Car was the final old-style car I needed to add. Lastly, I decided to add the snow plough for eye-candy purposes.

More to come soon

RailJade · Post by **RailJade** » 07 Jul 2005 20:04

I wonder if the US Set could use that Mail version of the doodlebug

.

Villem · Post by **Villem** » 07 Jul 2005 20:08

RailJade wrote:I wonder if the US Set could use that Mail version of the doodlebug .

it already has a mail version of the doodlebug.

RailJade · Post by **RailJade** » 07 Jul 2005 20:54

Akalamanaia wrote:
RailJade wrote:I wonder if the US Set could use that Mail version of the doodlebug .
it already has a mail version of the doodlebug.

I dont see the mail version the doodlebug in the USSet, even after refiting it

.

DanMacK · Post by **DanMacK** » 07 Jul 2005 20:55

Do you have the latewst version of the USSet?

RailJade · Post by **RailJade** » 07 Jul 2005 21:09

DanMacK wrote:Do you have the latewst version of the USSet?

Yes, I have the latest. Though when I looked to double check, I came to find out that I forgot to remove and replace the older name (that I placed in to separate each version)

Raichase · Post by **Raichase** » 07 Jul 2005 21:40

DanMacK wrote:Lastly, I decided to add the snow plough for eye-candy purposes.

Nice looking snowplough! I can't wait to try them out in my game - I love snowploughs

.

uzurpator · Post by **uzurpator** » 07 Jul 2005 22:10

Raichase wrote:Nice looking snowplough! I can't wait to try them out in my game - I love snowploughs .

You get tons of snowplough action in Sydney, duncha?

wallyweb · Post by **wallyweb** » 08 Jul 2005 00:06

DanMacK wrote:Lastly, I decided to add the snow plough for eye-candy purposes.

DanMacK · Post by **DanMacK** » 08 Jul 2005 00:37

The remainder (all 3 of 'em) of the ARS Steamers, the Hudson, the Northern and the Mallet. Also attached is the first diesel that'll show up - the S2. Last set of sprites is modern rolling stock-like stuff that you'll see after 1965

Raichase · Post by **Raichase** » 08 Jul 2005 04:58

uzurpator wrote:
Raichase wrote:Nice looking snowplough! I can't wait to try them out in my game - I love snowploughs .
You get tons of snowplough action in Sydney, duncha?

Not since the last ice-age

. I just love watching them in the snow, cutting through it. Don't get much snow here, so I like it in my games

.

DanMacK · Post by **DanMacK** » 08 Jul 2005 05:29

Progress on the ARS - Didn't think I had this much done sofar

wallyweb · Post by **wallyweb** » 08 Jul 2005 16:03

UhOh

Just had a thought re the snow plow.
Is it possible to have an unpowered wagon ahead of an engine in TTDX?

If not, the solution might be to have it minimally powered, supplemented by the engine chosen to push it?

DaleStan · Post by **DaleStan** » 08 Jul 2005 16:20

wallyweb wrote:Is it possible to have an unpowered wagon ahead of an engine in TTDX?

If not, the solution might be to have it minimally powered, supplemented by the engine chosen to push it?

The former is not possible (I guess Patchman thinks it's TMWFTLB; I see nothing in the savegame format that prohibits it.), but the latter is pretty easy. I think it should be possible to set it to have 0 TE, which would make it effectively not-an-engine.

jvassie · Post by **jvassie** » 08 Jul 2005 16:32

DanMacK,

what is the bi-level going to look like (photo)?

I was just wondering if you wanted me to draw it for you?

Cheers
James

Transport Tycoon Forums

North American Renewal Set - Ver. 1.0 Released! - 04/04/06

Snow Plow

Re: Snow Plow

Who is online