New suggestions for the patch (no new suggestions here!)

eis_os · Post by **eis_os** » 02 Jul 2003 16:39

SHADOW-XIII wrote:
WillC20 wrote:I know that, I want it to be made possible.
get a source code of TTDPatch and try make it possible yourself

Yes, contribute a patch for it and I am sure we will use it

Sokko · Post by **Sokko** » 03 Jul 2003 10:35

There are things that are impossible right now, and there are things that will be impossible forever. This, I fear, is one of the latter.

Oh well.

SHADOW-XIII · Post by **SHADOW-XIII** » 03 Jul 2003 11:10

who knows ... mayhbe Chris will join Developer team

troopper5 · Post by **troopper5** » 03 Jul 2003 11:21

That would help Josef a lot

Raichase · Post by **Raichase** » 03 Jul 2003 20:40

SHADOW-XIII wrote:who knows ... mayhbe Chris will join Developer team

I don't think he would... I doubt that he will work for free

way_2_fun · Post by **way_2_fun** » 04 Jul 2003 01:43

He wouldn't.

He's too good for us.

SHADOW-XIII · Post by **SHADOW-XIII** » 04 Jul 2003 07:43

way_2_fun wrote:He wouldn't. He's too good for us.

He will not, this is for sure, but with the second part of your suggestion I do not agree

Stylesjl · Post by **Stylesjl** » 04 Jul 2003 08:22

SHADOW-XIII wrote:
way_2_fun wrote:He wouldn't. He's too good for us.
He will not, this is for sure, but with the second part of your suggestion I do not agree

Well trerrierbly sorry to say that the second part is true there are only 1000 members here (1 quarter not even active) we could pitch in 30$ each but that is no where near enough to produce commercial software

30$X900=27000$ (we need hundreds of thousands or even millions

)

troopper5 · Post by **troopper5** » 04 Jul 2003 18:17

We certainly do.
Or if all over thoustand members will pray to Chris that he would join up with Josef

Raichase · Post by **Raichase** » 05 Jul 2003 09:28

troopper5 wrote:We certainly do.
Or if all over thoustand members will pray to Chris that he would join up with Josef

I don't think praying is going to do much good.

Anyway, this thread is for suggestions for the patch, not talking about Chris Sawyer

Stylesjl · Post by **Stylesjl** » 05 Jul 2003 09:35

hmm a feature

slopes for HQ's
and transmitters and lighthouses (beacons) on slopes

Raichase · Post by **Raichase** » 05 Jul 2003 09:47

I like the bit about the HQ's. It would be nice to have a view...

Prof. Frink · Post by **Prof. Frink** » 05 Jul 2003 13:38

I would like to see bridges over diagonal track.

At the moment I have to tunnel under these tracks, which takes up too much space.

Also over tracks with signals.

eis_os · Post by **eis_os** » 05 Jul 2003 13:53

Prof. Frink wrote:I would like to see bridges over diagonal track.

At the moment I have to tunnel under these tracks, which takes up too much space.

Also over tracks with signals.

Both no way, there isn't any bit free for such a thing and would be very very complex to make possible -> impossible

SGWebmaster · Post by **SGWebmaster** » 05 Jul 2003 15:55

Is there any way that a production level could be shown on the power station screen (the one after clicking the industry). The same sort of thing has been done with moretownstats to add details to the town info window. Is this possible?

------

Ninham Power Station

Requires: Coal
Production Last Month: 1000 kWh

(for example)

SHADOW-XIII · Post by **SHADOW-XIII** » 05 Jul 2003 16:26

SGWebmaster wrote:Is there any way that a production level could be shown on the power station screen (the one after clicking the industry). The same sort of thing has been done with moretownstats to add details to the town info window. Is this possible?

I heard that there is no space for that

SGWebmaster · Post by **SGWebmaster** » 05 Jul 2003 17:59

Sorry, Space? I presume not physical space in the window. I can't see that it would take that much programming space but then I have never programmed.

Dinges · Post by **Dinges** » 05 Jul 2003 18:13

I think it's not like programming, more like hacking.

Petae · Post by **Petae** » 05 Jul 2003 18:22

so the patch only alters parts of code ???
never thaught of it that way...

Hyronymus · Post by **Hyronymus** » 05 Jul 2003 19:21

Petae wrote:so the patch only alters parts of code ???
never thaught of it that way...

As far as I'm aware it indeed replaces bits of the code by enhanced code, all within the 'natural' limits of TTD. But what is the use for the productivity rate of an electricity plant? It doesn't produce anything transportable, it's really an endpoint. I think I understand Shadow's reply: you have to create a standard depending on the amount of coal transported to the electricity plant. Say 720 tons of coal / month is 25% but you supply it with 3600 tons of coal / month. Will the productivity rate really be 120%?

Transport Tycoon Forums

New suggestions for the patch (no new suggestions here!)

Who is online