Getting heavy, m'lordz?
Moderator: General Forums Moderators
Getting heavy, m'lordz?
The BBC have finally noticed that newer trains are heavier...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/6968868.stm
Enjoy your froth, guys!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/6968868.stm
Enjoy your froth, guys!
Andel
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
DISCLAIMER: The views expressed in this post are not necessarily those of Andel, who will do and say almost anything to get the attention he craves.
[/size]
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
DISCLAIMER: The views expressed in this post are not necessarily those of Andel, who will do and say almost anything to get the attention he craves.
[/size]
Re: Getting heavy, m'lordz?
What? No picture of a Voyager?
It's like modern cars. Nobody wants to buy one that is lighter than the old one was. Oh the shame if you did that!
I think the future for trains lies in lightweighting by using better materials, such as composites, and using them more efficiently. Hybrid and regenerative braking technologies also have a big part to play.

It's like modern cars. Nobody wants to buy one that is lighter than the old one was. Oh the shame if you did that!
I think the future for trains lies in lightweighting by using better materials, such as composites, and using them more efficiently. Hybrid and regenerative braking technologies also have a big part to play.
Confusious say "Man with one altimeter always know height. Man with two altimeters never certain."
Re: Getting heavy, m'lordz?
Hmmm, just seems to be the trend. Just look at the new Golf GTi, it weighs almost 3 times as much as the original Mk1. People don't want to travel in rickety slam door units any more, and all those hydraulic doors, computers and safety equipment must weigh a bit.
I didn't know Voyagers were that heavy? They look a darn sight lighter, and narrower than those monster Pendolinos!Parkey wrote:What? No picture of a Voyager?![]()
Age of Industry Replacement Set
Themed industry set for OpenTTD
The Greenest Valley
A beautiful scenario featuring Cardiff and the south Wales valleys
Mountains and Prairies
Huge scenario based on Western Canada
Themed industry set for OpenTTD
The Greenest Valley
A beautiful scenario featuring Cardiff and the south Wales valleys
Mountains and Prairies
Huge scenario based on Western Canada
Re: Getting heavy, m'lordz?
Sounds more like a classic co-ordination failure to me - the train company is unaware of the track properties, and the manufacturer is simply selling something off the shelf and has no idea of the problem. Time to go back to vertical integration...
Re: Getting heavy, m'lordz?
Network rail are, all things considered, doing quite well. Why don't we give them responsibility for running some trains as well? Trouble is, if that happened, the Network in "Network rail" doesn't make the name come across as that of the body responsible for the country's rail network. Perhaps if we changed it to "United Kingdom" or, better still "British"...... Oh. 

Confusious say "Man with one altimeter always know height. Man with two altimeters never certain."
Re: Getting heavy, m'lordz?
Andy - Voyagers weigh a lot and they tend to chew tracks, as do the Meridians and Pioneers... well, they're all the same - 22X class.
Andel
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
DISCLAIMER: The views expressed in this post are not necessarily those of Andel, who will do and say almost anything to get the attention he craves.
[/size]
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
DISCLAIMER: The views expressed in this post are not necessarily those of Andel, who will do and say almost anything to get the attention he craves.
[/size]
Re: Getting heavy, m'lordz?
All those diesel motors, retention tanks and tall airline seats must add up to something ... is it time for a "Bring back the MK3" campaignandel wrote:Andy - Voyagers weigh a lot and they tend to chew tracks, as do the Meridians and Pioneers... well, they're all the same - 22X class.

Re: Getting heavy, m'lordz?
take a GNER train, you will sometimes find yourself in a HST set 

The occasional look back at your past can teach you a great many things...
Re: Getting heavy, m'lordz?
Prefer the Mk4s myself, but that's probably because FGW have put me off refurbished Mk3s.m3henry wrote:take a GNER train, you will sometimes find yourself in a HST set
Confusious say "Man with one altimeter always know height. Man with two altimeters never certain."
Re: Getting heavy, m'lordz?
Hybrid trains with their masses of incredibly heavy batteries?Parkey wrote:I think the future for trains lies in lightweighting by using better materials, such as composites, and using them more efficiently. Hybrid and regenerative braking technologies also have a big part to play.

Re: Getting heavy, m'lordz?
You have to be sensible about it. In an ideal world (a world run by engineers, not dogmatic politicians) one would do a performance comparison with the conventional alternative for a particular route and see if there's a net benefit. Hybrid vehicles work best if the vehicle is constantly stopping and starting a lot. Even with the extra weight of the flywheel or batteries to store the energy the fact that energy isn't all wasted when it brakes makes up for the additional weight.
DMUs on local services in particular could benefit a heck of a lot from this kind of technology because not only does it save a lot of fuel but it also improves the acceleration a lot without having to increase the engine size. I guess mainline train like a HST that may run for over an hour between stops would probably not benefit much at all, but in a sane world the busy lines those run on would be electrified...
DMUs on local services in particular could benefit a heck of a lot from this kind of technology because not only does it save a lot of fuel but it also improves the acceleration a lot without having to increase the engine size. I guess mainline train like a HST that may run for over an hour between stops would probably not benefit much at all, but in a sane world the busy lines those run on would be electrified...
Confusious say "Man with one altimeter always know height. Man with two altimeters never certain."
Re: Getting heavy, m'lordz?
Wasn't a good proportion of main line track replaced only 7-8 years ago in light of a number of de-railments?
I remember hearing there was up-roar when it was found out the contract for the track material was tendered out to an Italian or Spanish steel company, who's imported steel was said to be more brittle and less hard wearing than what British Steel were going to provide!
It can't all be blamed on heavier passenger trains (and don't forget about the even heavier freight trains which are probably using the same lines in the first place).
I remember hearing there was up-roar when it was found out the contract for the track material was tendered out to an Italian or Spanish steel company, who's imported steel was said to be more brittle and less hard wearing than what British Steel were going to provide!
It can't all be blamed on heavier passenger trains (and don't forget about the even heavier freight trains which are probably using the same lines in the first place).
Re: Getting heavy, m'lordz?
I agree, passenger trains are comparatively light compared with some railway wagons.

Hmmm, I just had an idea how to persuade the DfT to fund a HSL
Hmmm, I just had an idea how to persuade the DfT to fund a HSL
Confusious say "Man with one altimeter always know height. Man with two altimeters never certain."
Re: Getting heavy, m'lordz?
Is this the latest in "enhancements" to passenger safety and security?
You ain't seen me. Right?
Re: Getting heavy, m'lordz?
Nope, its AMI Trains off to hunt down Parkey.
Andel
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
DISCLAIMER: The views expressed in this post are not necessarily those of Andel, who will do and say almost anything to get the attention he craves.
[/size]
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
DISCLAIMER: The views expressed in this post are not necessarily those of Andel, who will do and say almost anything to get the attention he craves.
[/size]
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests