Getting heavy, m'lordz?

Take a break from playing the game and chat here about real-world transportation issues!

Moderator: General Forums Moderators

Post Reply
andel
Retired Moderator
Retired Moderator
Posts: 7266
Joined: 07 May 2005 20:20
Location: Up front

Getting heavy, m'lordz?

Post by andel »

The BBC have finally noticed that newer trains are heavier...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/6968868.stm

Enjoy your froth, guys!
Andel
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
DISCLAIMER: The views expressed in this post are not necessarily those of Andel, who will do and say almost anything to get the attention he craves.
[/size]
User avatar
Parkey
Director
Director
Posts: 541
Joined: 17 Nov 2006 12:45
Location: Oxford, United Kingdom

Re: Getting heavy, m'lordz?

Post by Parkey »

What? No picture of a Voyager? :wink:

It's like modern cars. Nobody wants to buy one that is lighter than the old one was. Oh the shame if you did that!

I think the future for trains lies in lightweighting by using better materials, such as composites, and using them more efficiently. Hybrid and regenerative braking technologies also have a big part to play.
Confusious say "Man with one altimeter always know height. Man with two altimeters never certain."
User avatar
andysine
Tycoon
Tycoon
Posts: 1050
Joined: 31 Mar 2006 14:07
Location: Bath, England

Re: Getting heavy, m'lordz?

Post by andysine »

Hmmm, just seems to be the trend. Just look at the new Golf GTi, it weighs almost 3 times as much as the original Mk1. People don't want to travel in rickety slam door units any more, and all those hydraulic doors, computers and safety equipment must weigh a bit.
Parkey wrote:What? No picture of a Voyager? :wink:
I didn't know Voyagers were that heavy? They look a darn sight lighter, and narrower than those monster Pendolinos!
Age of Industry Replacement Set
Themed industry set for OpenTTD

The Greenest Valley
A beautiful scenario featuring Cardiff and the south Wales valleys

Mountains and Prairies
Huge scenario based on Western Canada
User avatar
Kevo00
Tycoon
Tycoon
Posts: 5646
Joined: 07 Feb 2004 01:51
Location: East Coast MainLine

Re: Getting heavy, m'lordz?

Post by Kevo00 »

Sounds more like a classic co-ordination failure to me - the train company is unaware of the track properties, and the manufacturer is simply selling something off the shelf and has no idea of the problem. Time to go back to vertical integration...
User avatar
Parkey
Director
Director
Posts: 541
Joined: 17 Nov 2006 12:45
Location: Oxford, United Kingdom

Re: Getting heavy, m'lordz?

Post by Parkey »

Network rail are, all things considered, doing quite well. Why don't we give them responsibility for running some trains as well? Trouble is, if that happened, the Network in "Network rail" doesn't make the name come across as that of the body responsible for the country's rail network. Perhaps if we changed it to "United Kingdom" or, better still "British"...... Oh. :oops:
Confusious say "Man with one altimeter always know height. Man with two altimeters never certain."
andel
Retired Moderator
Retired Moderator
Posts: 7266
Joined: 07 May 2005 20:20
Location: Up front

Re: Getting heavy, m'lordz?

Post by andel »

Andy - Voyagers weigh a lot and they tend to chew tracks, as do the Meridians and Pioneers... well, they're all the same - 22X class.
Andel
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
DISCLAIMER: The views expressed in this post are not necessarily those of Andel, who will do and say almost anything to get the attention he craves.
[/size]
patter
Engineer
Engineer
Posts: 125
Joined: 07 Apr 2007 13:42
Contact:

Re: Getting heavy, m'lordz?

Post by patter »

andel wrote:Andy - Voyagers weigh a lot and they tend to chew tracks, as do the Meridians and Pioneers... well, they're all the same - 22X class.
All those diesel motors, retention tanks and tall airline seats must add up to something ... is it time for a "Bring back the MK3" campaign :P
User avatar
m3henry
Tycoon
Tycoon
Posts: 1985
Joined: 15 Feb 2006 12:00
Location: Hampshire

Re: Getting heavy, m'lordz?

Post by m3henry »

take a GNER train, you will sometimes find yourself in a HST set :D
The occasional look back at your past can teach you a great many things...
User avatar
Parkey
Director
Director
Posts: 541
Joined: 17 Nov 2006 12:45
Location: Oxford, United Kingdom

Re: Getting heavy, m'lordz?

Post by Parkey »

m3henry wrote:take a GNER train, you will sometimes find yourself in a HST set :D
Prefer the Mk4s myself, but that's probably because FGW have put me off refurbished Mk3s.
Confusious say "Man with one altimeter always know height. Man with two altimeters never certain."
User avatar
Ameecher
Tycoon
Tycoon
Posts: 11919
Joined: 12 Aug 2006 15:39
Contact:

Re: Getting heavy, m'lordz?

Post by Ameecher »

Parkey wrote:I think the future for trains lies in lightweighting by using better materials, such as composites, and using them more efficiently. Hybrid and regenerative braking technologies also have a big part to play.
Hybrid trains with their masses of incredibly heavy batteries? :roll:
Image
User avatar
Parkey
Director
Director
Posts: 541
Joined: 17 Nov 2006 12:45
Location: Oxford, United Kingdom

Re: Getting heavy, m'lordz?

Post by Parkey »

You have to be sensible about it. In an ideal world (a world run by engineers, not dogmatic politicians) one would do a performance comparison with the conventional alternative for a particular route and see if there's a net benefit. Hybrid vehicles work best if the vehicle is constantly stopping and starting a lot. Even with the extra weight of the flywheel or batteries to store the energy the fact that energy isn't all wasted when it brakes makes up for the additional weight.

DMUs on local services in particular could benefit a heck of a lot from this kind of technology because not only does it save a lot of fuel but it also improves the acceleration a lot without having to increase the engine size. I guess mainline train like a HST that may run for over an hour between stops would probably not benefit much at all, but in a sane world the busy lines those run on would be electrified...
Confusious say "Man with one altimeter always know height. Man with two altimeters never certain."
User avatar
Benjamin
Engineer
Engineer
Posts: 54
Joined: 10 Aug 2007 20:35
Location: Wales, on a hill, near some sheep.

Re: Getting heavy, m'lordz?

Post by Benjamin »

Wasn't a good proportion of main line track replaced only 7-8 years ago in light of a number of de-railments?

I remember hearing there was up-roar when it was found out the contract for the track material was tendered out to an Italian or Spanish steel company, who's imported steel was said to be more brittle and less hard wearing than what British Steel were going to provide!

It can't all be blamed on heavier passenger trains (and don't forget about the even heavier freight trains which are probably using the same lines in the first place).
User avatar
Parkey
Director
Director
Posts: 541
Joined: 17 Nov 2006 12:45
Location: Oxford, United Kingdom

Re: Getting heavy, m'lordz?

Post by Parkey »

I agree, passenger trains are comparatively light compared with some railway wagons.

Image

Hmmm, I just had an idea how to persuade the DfT to fund a HSL
Confusious say "Man with one altimeter always know height. Man with two altimeters never certain."
User avatar
Benjamin
Engineer
Engineer
Posts: 54
Joined: 10 Aug 2007 20:35
Location: Wales, on a hill, near some sheep.

Re: Getting heavy, m'lordz?

Post by Benjamin »

Is this the latest in "enhancements" to passenger safety and security?
You ain't seen me. Right?
andel
Retired Moderator
Retired Moderator
Posts: 7266
Joined: 07 May 2005 20:20
Location: Up front

Re: Getting heavy, m'lordz?

Post by andel »

Nope, its AMI Trains off to hunt down Parkey.
Andel
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
DISCLAIMER: The views expressed in this post are not necessarily those of Andel, who will do and say almost anything to get the attention he craves.
[/size]
Post Reply

Return to “Real-World Transport Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests