New Graphics - Blender ".blend" thread (Works In Progress)

Sleepie · Post by **Sleepie** » 22 Mar 2007 11:01

All three look good, well I would say C looks most futuristic so it maybe the best choice

Need_Help · Post by **Need_Help** » 22 Mar 2007 11:48

Wacki wrote:
Need_Help wrote:I vote for B, but change a bit. I think you can make a 'logo' just like the real one on the place as shown as the picture before my post. Maybe a round 'dot' and the company colour. Another problem is, the 'head' should be smoother, this is too 'sharp'. The wings should be larger, because the engine behind there is a lot bigger, and its too long, which makes it not realistic. You should use a reference image when you model it, to make it looks real (not just looking at it, but following exactly what is the scale of the plane)

Thanks
Which model you meaned? S_U52 or BL_LB80? I made both of them according to blueprints!!! So models and sizes are realistic!!!!!!!!!!

I mean this
http://www.tt-forums.net//files/bakewel ... 80_154.jpg

You are modelling it with reference image? (putting it in your viewport, and model it with top, side, front, back views according, and exactly as the reference image). It doesn't seems right, the engine and the plane is ok, but the 'wings' are so small. Please, show me your reference image that you used to model the plane

Thanks

Purno · Post by **Purno** » 22 Mar 2007 11:50

Version C, IMO. But wouldn't it be cool to add 2cc right away?

DeletedUser21 · Post by **DeletedUser21** » 22 Mar 2007 12:19

Yes I vote C aswell, rectangular engines are abit like (sc)ram-jet technology. (Altough this plane won't get that fast.) It sure looks futuristic.

Wacki · Post by **Wacki** » 22 Mar 2007 12:26

Need_Help wrote: You are modelling it with reference image? (putting it in your viewport, and model it with top, side, front, back views according, and exactly as the reference image). It doesn't seems right, the engine and the plane is ok, but the 'wings' are so small. Please, show me your reference image that you used to model the plane

Thanks

DarkFenX · Post by **DarkFenX** » 22 Mar 2007 12:53

B and C are done very well imo.
Vote for C, like others - it's more futuristic

brupje · Post by **brupje** » 22 Mar 2007 12:59

vot for B and C ;p make it an upgrade or somethign

Need_Help · Post by **Need_Help** » 22 Mar 2007 13:15

Oh well, it surpriced that there is a plane like that, I didn't see any plane like that in airport/TV. Well, for your Kelling plane, its not bad, but not logic

How can a plane 'turn' with a wing like that? And I also think that the plane won't be able to take off with that design

But well, this is just game, everything can happen

Thanks

Note : Will there be 'Airbus 380' in OTTD?

Wacki · Post by **Wacki** » 22 Mar 2007 13:25

Purno wrote:Version C, IMO. But wouldn't it be cool to add 2cc right away?

I am not sure, that I understand you. You mean somethings like that?

brupje · Post by **brupje** » 22 Mar 2007 13:28

Need_Help wrote:
Note : Will there be 'Airbus 380' in OTTD?

If you build it ;p

DeletedUser21 · Post by **DeletedUser21** » 22 Mar 2007 14:21

Wacki wrote:
Purno wrote:Version C, IMO. But wouldn't it be cool to add 2cc right away?
I am not sure, that I understand you. You mean somethings like that?

2cc? Means 2 company colours.

Tough this new render with 2 engines at each side are pretty neat too!

/me waits for the warp nacelles.

ZxBiohazardZx · Post by **ZxBiohazardZx** » 22 Mar 2007 20:38

@tagdaze: can you please do a try for a more detailled version of the depot, i made big progress but i really cant get the details in i want to be there, for ideas check this picture:

its not that i quit modeling, i just have to do more blender tutorials, your monorail looked very nice.....

Sergej_S · Post by **Sergej_S** » 22 Mar 2007 20:41

Wacki wrote:Which is better?

I personally like the real prototypes, which existed in a history and have the real characteristics,
That is period 1920 - 2007.

Sergej

Born Acorn · Post by **Born Acorn** » 22 Mar 2007 23:44

That's good for you, but we need a range from 1920-2050.

Sleepie · Post by **Sleepie** » 22 Mar 2007 23:49

Born Acorn wrote:That's good for you, but we need a range from 1920-2050.

Maybe even beyond 2050

NukeBuster · Post by **NukeBuster** » 23 Mar 2007 12:10

Wacki wrote:
Purno wrote:Version C, IMO. But wouldn't it be cool to add 2cc right away?
I am not sure, that I understand you. You mean somethings like that?

Like the 2 engines A LOT.

DarkFenX · Post by **DarkFenX** » 23 Mar 2007 17:34

I like it too, but don't think that such a small plane like kelling should have 4 engines...

Wacki · Post by **Wacki** » 23 Mar 2007 18:21

DarkFenX wrote:I like it too, but don't think that such a small plane like kelling should have 4 engines...

It is true, I made it 25mx25m, so I attach only 2 engines!!

Wacki · Post by **Wacki** » 24 Mar 2007 10:58

I try to make new plane: Sonic Cruiser.

DeletedUser21 · Post by **DeletedUser21** » 24 Mar 2007 11:18

Hell yeah! That looks very very very awesome!

Wow! Keep up the good work man! Soon and you are done with all the planes just in 1 go at them.

Two thumbs up!

Transport Tycoon Forums

New Graphics - Blender ".blend" thread (Works In Progress)

Who is online