2.0.1 alpha / 2.5 beta discussion
Moderator: TTDPatch Moderators
Disable the station GRFs, one at a time, until the problem goes away.
Then complain to the author of that station set.
Unless the problem doesn't exist in an earlier version of TTDPatch, in which case, report the GRF, and the last working version. (or first not working version, either way.)
Then complain to the author of that station set.
Unless the problem doesn't exist in an earlier version of TTDPatch, in which case, report the GRF, and the last working version. (or first not working version, either way.)
To get a good answer, ask a Smart Question. Similarly, if you want a bug fixed, write a Useful Bug Report. No TTDPatch crashlog? Then follow directions.
Projects: NFORenum (download) | PlaneSet (Website) | grfcodec (download) | grfdebug.log parser
Projects: NFORenum (download) | PlaneSet (Website) | grfcodec (download) | grfdebug.log parser
"miscmods.loaduntilgreen on/off" // keep loading at station until exit signal is green
Wie zich gelukkig voelt met het geluk van anderen, bezit een rijkdom zonder grenzen. (F.Daels)

Still the best OS around
Still the best OS around
A bug of Alpha.65 discovered.
Occasionally, a city or fab stop accepting cargo. The station near shows that this cargo type is accepted but all the goods are just laying on the station with mark "en-route from...". New stations do not solve this problem, it looks like fab just goes "off-line" somehow. And it doesn't matter that this fab a year away works absolutely normal.
This is not only mine experience, I asked some people with a.65 installed and they reported of similar cases.
Occasionally, a city or fab stop accepting cargo. The station near shows that this cargo type is accepted but all the goods are just laying on the station with mark "en-route from...". New stations do not solve this problem, it looks like fab just goes "off-line" somehow. And it doesn't matter that this fab a year away works absolutely normal.
This is not only mine experience, I asked some people with a.65 installed and they reported of similar cases.
No, it's not because of planeset.
But I've found why.
This bug occurs when using the "unload" function. No difference, if the planeset active, or not. When I point "unload" at the station, cargo remains on it without of being accepted by the fab (or city). When turned "unload" off -- everything is all right.
But I've found why.
This bug occurs when using the "unload" function. No difference, if the planeset active, or not. When I point "unload" at the station, cargo remains on it without of being accepted by the fab (or city). When turned "unload" off -- everything is all right.
and that is not a bug, Might I sugest reading the manual before posting 'bugs'?? you can find it at http://www.ttdpatch.net/doc.html
Don't be so hostile, both of you. The entire pages broodje refered too is about FAQ, help, readme's etc. But for your convinience:
http://wiki.ttdpatch.net/tiki-index.php ... derService
http://wiki.ttdpatch.net/tiki-index.php ... derService
... here's a bug, present since feature release and still around with a65.
That 'Refittable to' comment shows up with wagons that do not carry cargo, such as our caboose and the steam generator unit. It happens when, immediately prior to displaying the vehicle details of the caboose (e.g.) that window displayed the details of another wagon, that does carry refittable cargo.
... and while you are fixing this, you can make this feature an 'opt out of it' one as I do not wish to have it; I already show refittable cargo, see sample. I would like to have 'Refittable to' not shown by the time the Canadian Set is released in December.
That 'Refittable to' comment shows up with wagons that do not carry cargo, such as our caboose and the steam generator unit. It happens when, immediately prior to displaying the vehicle details of the caboose (e.g.) that window displayed the details of another wagon, that does carry refittable cargo.
... and while you are fixing this, you can make this feature an 'opt out of it' one as I do not wish to have it; I already show refittable cargo, see sample. I would like to have 'Refittable to' not shown by the time the Canadian Set is released in December.
What about new cargo sets though that you don't know about? Are you simply not going to support them (via cargo class based refitting)?OzTransLtd wrote:... and while you are fixing this, you can make this feature an 'opt out of it' one as I do not wish to have it; I already show refittable cargo, see sample. I would like to have 'Refittable to' not shown by the time the Canadian Set is released in December.
-
- Tycoon
- Posts: 5954
- Joined: 27 Apr 2005 07:09
- Contact:
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests