wma vs. MP3

This is the place to talk about anything not related to Transport Tycoon itself.

Moderator: General Forums Moderators

Post Reply

Do you use Mp3 or wma for music files?

Mp3
9
50%
wma
1
6%
Both
6
33%
other
2
11%
 
Total votes: 18

Steven
Engineer
Engineer
Posts: 38
Joined: 17 Oct 2002 08:46
Location: England
Contact:

wma vs. MP3

Post by Steven »

Hi. I have a friend who is redo-ing his audio cds to wma instead of mp3, saying
that they are smaller and better quality.
Firstly, Is this true?
Secondly, Do any of you know of a free downloadable program I could use to convert multiple directories of mp3s into wmas automatically,
maintaining the directory structure? (my ,mp3's are sorted into artist
directories and this took me quite a while. :wink: )
Last edited by Steven on 22 Feb 2003 15:10, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Dinges
Tycoon
Tycoon
Posts: 2865
Joined: 07 Jan 2003 18:00
Location: Fryslân Boppe!
Contact:

Post by Dinges »

I use both, can I vote that instead?
Dinges

Who is the other person in me?

my Blog (dutch) - my Last.fm profile

Owner of http://ttdgraphics.cjb.net/ ! Temp addr: http://ttdgraphics.owenrudge.com/
Steven
Engineer
Engineer
Posts: 38
Joined: 17 Oct 2002 08:46
Location: England
Contact:

Post by Steven »

Dinges wrote:I use both, can I vote that instead?
You can now :D
User avatar
orudge
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 25219
Joined: 26 Jan 2001 20:18
Skype: orudge
Location: Banchory, UK
Contact:

Post by orudge »

Ogg Vorbis! Much better than MP3 and WMA, plus it's open source and patent-free. You can download Ogg Vorbis filters for DirectShow (ie, Windows Media Player), and support is built into Winamp and many other players.

Listen to these attachment comparison files. Both were based on an original CD track, and
I've tried to match the settings as closely as possible:

Vorbis 1.0, 44,100Hz mono, 40kbps (0.0q) VBR
MPEG Layer 3, 44,100Hz mono, 40kbps

(WMA version may follow later)
Attachments
comparison.zip
Comparison
(222.27 KiB) Downloaded 95 times
User avatar
SGWebmaster
Tycoon
Tycoon
Posts: 1564
Joined: 11 Jan 2003 15:47
Location: Preston, UK
Contact:

Post by SGWebmaster »

MP3 - it's much more widely supported and it doesn't bow to the idea of Microsoft's all conquering ideals. Also, file sharing stuff tends to come in MP3 and there's not much point in subsequently converting it to WMA.
SGWebmaster
-/-/-/-/-/-
http://www.multibellropes.freeserve.co.uk
UD Team
-:-:-:-:-:-
Urah, hanevel, v'chinor! A-irah shahar!
-/-/-/-/-/-
Please Note: Brain Shut Down For Maintence
Alan
Engineer
Engineer
Posts: 27
Joined: 22 Feb 2003 17:28

Post by Alan »

I use any type compatible with Atomix, PCDJ, OtsJuke, Tractor and all the other mixers etc. :P
User avatar
rob14
Engineer
Engineer
Posts: 74
Joined: 05 Feb 2003 20:26
Location: Preston, UK
Contact:

Post by rob14 »

I use MP3 - I find it a lot easier to convert to this than WMA - mainly due to http://www.dbpoweramp.com and it's popup right-click function which converts waves/mp3s/etc. I'm sure it used to do wmas as well, but I might be wrong as I haven't found it in the 'Music Converter' version I downloaded the other night.
*** Do Not Adjust Your Mind - There Is A Fault In Reality ***

http://www.swottosgrotto.co.uk
http://www.ringing-online.freeserve.co.uk
User avatar
orudge
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 25219
Joined: 26 Jan 2001 20:18
Skype: orudge
Location: Banchory, UK
Contact:

Post by orudge »

You lot really should try Ogg Vorbis though, it's very good. :)
User avatar
SGWebmaster
Tycoon
Tycoon
Posts: 1564
Joined: 11 Jan 2003 15:47
Location: Preston, UK
Contact:

Post by SGWebmaster »

So you keep telling us. I just don't think I've ever seen an OGG Vorbis file in my life!
SGWebmaster
-/-/-/-/-/-
http://www.multibellropes.freeserve.co.uk
UD Team
-:-:-:-:-:-
Urah, hanevel, v'chinor! A-irah shahar!
-/-/-/-/-/-
Please Note: Brain Shut Down For Maintence
User avatar
lynsey
Tycoon
Tycoon
Posts: 1258
Joined: 27 Nov 2002 18:50
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by lynsey »

All my music files are OGG Vorbis, I like it that they're nice and small, plus, WinMX does give you the option to search for OGG files so it's becoming more widespread by the looks of things. I don't use it cos the files are better quality though, seeing as I mostly just convert MP3s to OGG files, it won't increase the quality of them.
Steven
Engineer
Engineer
Posts: 38
Joined: 17 Oct 2002 08:46
Location: England
Contact:

Post by Steven »

lynsey wrote:All my music files are OGG Vorbis, I like it that they're nice and small, plus, WinMX does give you the option to search for OGG files so it's becoming more widespread by the looks of things. I don't use it cos the files are better quality though, seeing as I mostly just convert MP3s to OGG files, it won't increase the quality of them.
Do you know approximatly, off the top of your head, how much smaller?
half the size three quarters or even 95% of the size on average?
User avatar
lynsey
Tycoon
Tycoon
Posts: 1258
Joined: 27 Nov 2002 18:50
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by lynsey »

I don't know, it's a fair bit when you've got a lot of files, but not loads, in 3.57gig of OGG files I can fit more than 7 CDs full of MP3s (I had 7 CDs of MP3s on my old PC, OGGed them and put them on my new PC, but then that's not counting all those I've downloaded since I had this PC sometime last summer)
Steven
Engineer
Engineer
Posts: 38
Joined: 17 Oct 2002 08:46
Location: England
Contact:

Post by Steven »

thanks. thats the sort of info I was after.
User avatar
orudge
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 25219
Joined: 26 Jan 2001 20:18
Skype: orudge
Location: Banchory, UK
Contact:

Post by orudge »

C:\MP3s contains 194 Oggs taking 1.02GB, and 193 MP3s taking 798MB. I encode all my Oggs at 0.7q (~224kbps) though, while my MP3s can be anything from 64 to 320kbps, depending where I got them from. The Oggs are much higher quality than the equivalent bitrate MP3.

BTW, C:\MP3s is so called for historical reasons. ;)
Post Reply

Return to “Off-Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Semrush [Bot] and 13 guests