Because many managers live under the false pretence that passengers actually give a flying crap about what brand train they're travelling on.Geo Ghost wrote:Jamie - Didn't know XC hadn't changed their interior. Though to be fair, if it does the function then why spend x-amount of money changing it
Virgin to lose West Coast?
Moderator: General Forums Moderators
Re: Virgin to lose West Coast?
Re: Virgin to lose West Coast?
Is it just me, or does this article sound horribly opinionated and biased? I know it's in the website's 'Magazine' section, but still, it sounds unnecessarily harsh to me:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-19268724
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-19268724
“Blackmail is such an ugly word. I prefer extortion. The ‘x’ makes it sound cool.”
- Redirect Left
- Tycoon
- Posts: 7417
- Joined: 22 Jan 2005 19:31
- Location: Wakefield, West Yorkshire
Re: Virgin to lose West Coast?
haha. I was about to post that same link here with a similar mention to its bias. It does seem horribly harsh indeed. Although the comments do seem to be fairly praising.beeb375 wrote:Is it just me, or does this article sound horribly opinionated and biased? I know it's in the website's 'Magazine' section, but still, it sounds unnecessarily harsh to me:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-19268724
Re: Virgin to lose West Coast?
Welcome to the world of media.beeb375 wrote:does this article sound horribly opinionated and biased?
Only a few paragraphs into that "picture this scene" intro and I am convinced the person writing that report is a compete toss pot.
- 61653
- Tycoon
- Posts: 2095
- Joined: 29 Sep 2009 09:13
- Location: Batley, the People's Republic of West Yorkshire.
Re: Virgin to lose West Coast?
Slightly off-topic, but in what way are 143s better than 144s? (other than possibly being cleaner than Northern's overworked units?), they are largely similar, though 144s seem to be less prone to bursting into flames! 142s, I agree, are horrible things.Jolteon wrote:(143s, admittedly better than 142/144s here...)
I was social distancing before it was cool
Formerly known as 47434
Last train journey I could be bothered to look up the headcode for: 04/02/2016, Mirfield to Batley, 2J34 1459 Huddersfield to Leeds, Northern Rail 144015

Formerly known as 47434
Last train journey I could be bothered to look up the headcode for: 04/02/2016, Mirfield to Batley, 2J34 1459 Huddersfield to Leeds, Northern Rail 144015
- Redirect Left
- Tycoon
- Posts: 7417
- Joined: 22 Jan 2005 19:31
- Location: Wakefield, West Yorkshire
Re: Virgin to lose West Coast?
I find the 142 & 144s to be very unreliable, often turning up with out of service doors, or limping about on one engine, whereas this is yet to occur to me whilst using a 143, admittedly though of course, being a northern lad, it's not too often i'm around the 143s. I also think 143s look slightly nicer, they also (in my experience at least) are slightly nicer looking internally and comfier, although that is probably just First Great Western with more money to burn on refurbishments.47434 wrote:Slightly off-topic, but in what way are 143s better than 144s? (other than possibly being cleaner than Northern's overworked units?), they are largely similar, though 144s seem to be less prone to bursting into flames! 142s, I agree, are horrible things.Jolteon wrote:(143s, admittedly better than 142/144s here...)
I'm often left to wonder just how broken a train has to be before Northern finally decide to take it out of service, with how much things have gone wrong and it's still turned up and gone as normal on its journey.
Re: Virgin to lose West Coast?
So why did they go with First then??
I'm sure Beardy Branson will win his appeal.
I'm sure Beardy Branson will win his appeal.
Very much a retired regular poster..... If you can say that

Re: Virgin to lose West Coast?
Absolutely crazy. How can the DfT objectively justify its decision now?
Any opinions expressed are purely mine and not that of any employer, past or present.
Re: Virgin to lose West Coast?
One word - money.47407 wrote:So why did they go with First then??
I hate this world sometimes. Everything is so money driven now. What ever happened to quality?
Looking at that article, I would love to know where DFT gets their information from.
I don't even need to comment on it. It speaks for itself. Virgin have proved that they can deliver, I don't think FirstGroup proved that. I don't understand how on earth they can say FirstGroup is rated higher for customer service. Absolute bollocks. Same with delivery of trains. Virgin replaced their entire fleet with new trains. First are still running pacers in some places and don't have many new additions to their fleet.
- 61653
- Tycoon
- Posts: 2095
- Joined: 29 Sep 2009 09:13
- Location: Batley, the People's Republic of West Yorkshire.
Re: Virgin to lose West Coast?
Typical Tories- they know the price of everything and the value of nothing.
I was social distancing before it was cool
Formerly known as 47434
Last train journey I could be bothered to look up the headcode for: 04/02/2016, Mirfield to Batley, 2J34 1459 Huddersfield to Leeds, Northern Rail 144015

Formerly known as 47434
Last train journey I could be bothered to look up the headcode for: 04/02/2016, Mirfield to Batley, 2J34 1459 Huddersfield to Leeds, Northern Rail 144015
Re: Virgin to lose West Coast?
I smell a rat. Time for a public enquiry (there won't be one of course).A321Pilot wrote:Sorry, this is just stupid:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/news ... rable.html
Money is not a good reason to have gone for First, it will end up costing the Treasury and institutional investors a lot more than under the Virgin bid.
I really couldn't give two hoots about Virgin or First as companies, as who runs a franchise is quite inconsequential, but I do as a taxpayer giving up £700+ of my income to the treasury a month (before VAT and other duties).
Re: Virgin to lose West Coast?
Do you know where they get the money from??
The US, probably.
The US, probably.
Very much a retired regular poster..... If you can say that

- SquireJames
- Tycoon
- Posts: 1863
- Joined: 07 Aug 2004 11:56
- Skype: squirejames5
- Location: Stoke-on-Trent
- Contact:
Re: Virgin to lose West Coast?
I figured this was the case. I just wasn't sure how it all worked these days. Call me old fashioned, but it was simpler back in the day that everyone owned their own locomotives and rolling stock. At least it wasn't repainted into someone elses branding every week.Geo Ghost wrote: 91s aren't feasible for the WCML as the route is too 'bendy' (for use of a better word) for them to run effectively at top speed. The 91s were developed for the ECML specificallyThus Pendolinos wouldn't really be much use on the ECML.
So, it'll be First livery on a Pendo then. Wonder if anyone has mocked that up yet (knowing a few sites that specialise in that sort of thing). This appeal sounds interesting though. Do we here on the TT Forums suspect foul play? They could not possibly have got the money from the US though 47; the US hasn't any money to give

Re: Virgin to lose West Coast?
Do you mean their Greyhound and school bus businesses?47407 wrote:Do you know where they get the money from??
The US, probably.
Re: Virgin to lose West Coast?
I was under the impression that their US business was rather profitable. After all, it's recession proof. Leisure passengers will downgrade from trains to Greyhound, and school buses will run regardless of the state of the economy.
Any opinions expressed are purely mine and not that of any employer, past or present.
- EXTspotter
- Tycoon
- Posts: 3122
- Joined: 08 Jan 2008 18:51
- Location: Salisbury, UK
Re: Virgin to lose West Coast?
I thought that Greyhound was facing increasing competition in key sectors in the North East from the Chinatown type operators. Even if they are currently weakened due to recent bad press, having a low end competitor poaching custom on your routes can't be great in the long run for First or Greyhound's bottom line.
Re: Virgin to lose West Coast?
The scope of their route network however, combined with not enough passengers for two competing operators, put them in a pretty good position overall though.
Any opinions expressed are purely mine and not that of any employer, past or present.
- 61653
- Tycoon
- Posts: 2095
- Joined: 29 Sep 2009 09:13
- Location: Batley, the People's Republic of West Yorkshire.
Re: Virgin to lose West Coast?
Though don't Stagecoach/Megabus have a bit of a foothold in the US now, too?
I was social distancing before it was cool
Formerly known as 47434
Last train journey I could be bothered to look up the headcode for: 04/02/2016, Mirfield to Batley, 2J34 1459 Huddersfield to Leeds, Northern Rail 144015

Formerly known as 47434
Last train journey I could be bothered to look up the headcode for: 04/02/2016, Mirfield to Batley, 2J34 1459 Huddersfield to Leeds, Northern Rail 144015
- Redirect Left
- Tycoon
- Posts: 7417
- Joined: 22 Jan 2005 19:31
- Location: Wakefield, West Yorkshire
Re: Virgin to lose West Coast?
Some people are really going for it, new website has popped up; http://www.reinstatevirgin.co.uk/
Edit: Infact, after a quick look on the USA website - seems its only eastern and central USA.
Yes, Megabus now operates in many US states.47434 wrote:Though don't Stagecoach/Megabus have a bit of a foothold in the US now, too?
Edit: Infact, after a quick look on the USA website - seems its only eastern and central USA.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests