High Speed Two

Take a break from playing the game and chat here about real-world transportation issues!

Moderator: General Forums Moderators

User avatar
John
Tycoon
Tycoon
Posts: 3402
Joined: 05 May 2003 18:44
Location: Cotswolds, UK
Contact:

Re: High Speed Two

Post by John »

JamieLei wrote:
Kevo00 wrote: Also if London-Edin is transferred to HS2, I wonder what that would mean for ECML north of Newcastle? Downgrading, de-electrification, perhaps even total closure between Morpeth and Dunbar?
There's significant demand on CrossCountry, enough to warrant HSTs going north of Newcastle. I doubt the ECML would be shut or de-electrified, but there would be a reduction in services.

Even if de-electrifying it did made financial sense, any persons suggesting such would immediately be branded "Beeching" and would have committed almost certain political suicide.

One way Network Rail was justifying it was that HS2 would remove the long distance inter-city trains, freeing up space for commuter trains and freight traffic.

For HS2 going via the North East (Leeds and Newcastle) the following was said:
Network Rail wrote:The London-North East & Scotland option would free up additional train capacity on
the East Coast Main Line and Midland Main Line. However, at present there is no
requirement to provide additional passenger capacity on these lines due to planned
schemes.
However, I would also point out Kevo00 that not all people heading to Edinburgh/North Scotland on the ECML originated in London - I assume a small but significant source is still the North East (Sheffield, Leeds, Newcastle etc) who won't use HSL2 to get to Edinburgh and the further north...

Some other interesting sound bites
Network Rail wrote: What about a connection to HS1?

A physical connection to HS1 will lead to a small modal shift from air to rail.
However, the same can be achieved through a simple interchange, particularly
if the London terminal was at or near St Pancras. A physical connection will be
expensive, operationally difficult and will be detrimental to the overall business
case – most people will want to go to London, not Europe.
User avatar
JGR
Tycoon
Tycoon
Posts: 2603
Joined: 08 Aug 2005 13:46
Location: Ipswich

Re: High Speed Two

Post by JGR »

JamieLei wrote:Aparently it's how the French did it. Plus the majority of speed increases are to be had on long distances, since trains will already be crawling round station entrances on dedicated lines.
While I can't speak for all of France, from the numerous parts of the TGV network I know about (particularly around Paris), track into central stations is *much* wider, straighter and faster (number of tracks, layout, speed limit, general robustness) and in general HSTs can run at rather high speeds along these. Sometimes there are dedicated lanes as part of that, but often not...
In many cases you're going at high speed almost as fast as the train can accelerate out of/smoothly decelerate into the station.
Good luck doing that in London or Birmingham...
Ex TTDPatch Coder
Patch Pack, Github
User avatar
teccuk
Chief Executive
Chief Executive
Posts: 674
Joined: 04 Jan 2006 21:01

Re: High Speed Two

Post by teccuk »

Haha.

Here's mine.

Yes i know, stupid, never gonna happen. But would be cool.

Image
User avatar
Ploes
President
President
Posts: 956
Joined: 30 Jul 2006 16:04
Location: 127.0.0.1

Re: High Speed Two

Post by Ploes »

Why stop there?
If its going to be a separate High Speed network, I say we let Ireland get in on the act to!
Attachments
hs234567.jpg
hs234567.jpg (82.45 KiB) Viewed 571 times
User avatar
orudge
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 25217
Joined: 26 Jan 2001 20:18
Skype: orudge
Location: Banchory, UK
Contact:

Re: High Speed Two

Post by orudge »

Don't forget about Orkney and Shetland!
Attachments
Woo
Woo
orkney.png (623.25 KiB) Viewed 571 times
User avatar
Ploes
President
President
Posts: 956
Joined: 30 Jul 2006 16:04
Location: 127.0.0.1

Re: High Speed Two

Post by Ploes »

orudge wrote:Don't forget about Orkney and Shetland!
Thats just stilly.

If you going to put that kinda money in, you better make sure Cambletown and Stornoway get linked up.
Attachments
hs234567.jpg
hs234567.jpg (82.49 KiB) Viewed 569 times
User avatar
Ameecher
Tycoon
Tycoon
Posts: 11919
Joined: 12 Aug 2006 15:39
Contact:

Re: High Speed Two

Post by Ameecher »

I don't get the Anglesey link. I suppose linking in to ferries but how many daily sailings are there from Holyhead? Not enough to warrant High-Speed I bet. Money would be better spent increasing the line speed on the current hardly busy route.
Image
User avatar
Ploes
President
President
Posts: 956
Joined: 30 Jul 2006 16:04
Location: 127.0.0.1

Re: High Speed Two

Post by Ploes »

Ameecher wrote:I don't get the Anglesey link. I suppose linking in to ferries but how many daily sailings are there from Holyhead? Not enough to warrant High-Speed I bet. Money would be better spent increasing the line speed on the current hardly busy route.
For the new High Speed ferry's that will be timed to meet the trains.

Of course this is only a temporary measure, while the UberMegaSuper Dublin tunnel is being built.
User avatar
JamieLei
Tycoon
Tycoon
Posts: 7432
Joined: 10 Jan 2007 18:42
Location: Stratford, London

Re: High Speed Two

Post by JamieLei »

I say the Birmingham High Speed station should be right outside my house. There's a bit of grass there that noone uses, why not?

On a serious note, Virgin Trains run one train per day from Birmingham New Street to Holyhead (out in the morning, returning in the evening) specifically to connect with the Holyhead-Dublin ferry.
Any opinions expressed are purely mine and not that of any employer, past or present.
User avatar
railwayman
Engineer
Engineer
Posts: 122
Joined: 14 Jan 2009 17:16
Skype: dinozaurs97

Re: High Speed Two

Post by railwayman »

Ploes wrote:
orudge wrote:Don't forget about Orkney and Shetland!
Thats just stilly.

If you going to put that kinda money in, you better make sure Cambletown and Stornoway get linked up.
It is silly. You need to get the Isle Of Men and Isle Of Wight (forgive if any mistakes, not from Britain) on the High Speed Rail map too. And dont forget about the Heart of Wales HSRL and maybe few more links in Ierland :D :D
hs234567.jpg
hs234567.jpg (118.1 KiB) Viewed 565 times
User avatar
andysine
Tycoon
Tycoon
Posts: 1050
Joined: 31 Mar 2006 14:07
Location: Bath, England

Re: High Speed Two

Post by andysine »

Don't forget the Channel Islands!

Plus I added Birmingham to Norwich, as the current Central Trains service is too slow!

hs-extreme.jpg
hs-extreme.jpg (201.86 KiB) Viewed 567 times
Age of Industry Replacement Set
Themed industry set for OpenTTD

The Greenest Valley
A beautiful scenario featuring Cardiff and the south Wales valleys

Mountains and Prairies
Huge scenario based on Western Canada
User avatar
doktorhonig
Tycoon
Tycoon
Posts: 1104
Joined: 22 Aug 2006 11:03
Location: Austria
Contact:

Re: High Speed Two

Post by doktorhonig »

This thread is just hilarious.
User avatar
orudge
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 25217
Joined: 26 Jan 2001 20:18
Skype: orudge
Location: Banchory, UK
Contact:

Re: High Speed Two

Post by orudge »

Ameecher wrote:I don't get the Anglesey link. I suppose linking in to ferries but how many daily sailings are there from Holyhead? Not enough to warrant High-Speed I bet. Money would be better spent increasing the line speed on the current hardly busy route.
There are quite a few sailings from Holyhead - it is an extremely busy freight route. Probably not quite so busy with passenger traffic, though, with flying no doubt being an easier option for many people, or taking a ferry from somewhere else such as Liverpool or Fishguard or wherever.
User avatar
Ploes
President
President
Posts: 956
Joined: 30 Jul 2006 16:04
Location: 127.0.0.1

Re: High Speed Two

Post by Ploes »

Lets keep going to Norway.
Attachments
hs-2020.jpg
hs-2020.jpg (81.88 KiB) Viewed 572 times
User avatar
EXTspotter
Tycoon
Tycoon
Posts: 3122
Joined: 08 Jan 2008 18:51
Location: Salisbury, UK

Re: High Speed Two

Post by EXTspotter »

You forgot the all important Newton Abbot - St. Andrews line (for possible uni interviews) along with the very important line from Torbay via Penzance to the Scilly Isles and Brest.
Attachments
Random.PNG
Random.PNG (638.17 KiB) Viewed 584 times
Image
Image
User avatar
orudge
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 25217
Joined: 26 Jan 2001 20:18
Skype: orudge
Location: Banchory, UK
Contact:

Re: High Speed Two

Post by orudge »

Those are going to be some interesting bridges or tunnels you're building there.
User avatar
John
Tycoon
Tycoon
Posts: 3402
Joined: 05 May 2003 18:44
Location: Cotswolds, UK
Contact:

Re: High Speed Two

Post by John »

orudge wrote:Those are going to be some interesting bridges or tunnels you're building there.
And connecting the Shetlands won't?
User avatar
noofnoof
Tycoon
Tycoon
Posts: 1889
Joined: 25 Mar 2008 10:11
Location: A house in Australia...

Re: High Speed Two

Post by noofnoof »

You are ALL nuts...

you forgot about bellrock lighthouse.
Attachments
moar HS.jpg
moar HS.jpg (81.85 KiB) Viewed 567 times
User avatar
railwayman
Engineer
Engineer
Posts: 122
Joined: 14 Jan 2009 17:16
Skype: dinozaurs97

Re: High Speed Two

Post by railwayman »

noofnoof wrote:You are ALL nuts...

you forgot about bellrock lighthouse.
Im not from UK so Im asking:
Where is it? Below Aberdeen?

PS. You all forgot the Atlantic Ocean tunnel to New York. :D :D

Its a railway eddition of the proposed maglev tunnel by which you could get from London to NY ino 1 hour.
Attachments
NY.JPG
NY.JPG (83.29 KiB) Viewed 564 times
User avatar
Kevo00
Tycoon
Tycoon
Posts: 5646
Joined: 07 Feb 2004 01:51
Location: East Coast MainLine

Re: High Speed Two

Post by Kevo00 »

That could be cool, then the UK could link into Obama's high speed system in the US!
Post Reply

Return to “Real-World Transport Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests