JamieLei wrote:There's significant demand on CrossCountry, enough to warrant HSTs going north of Newcastle. I doubt the ECML would be shut or de-electrified, but there would be a reduction in services.Kevo00 wrote: Also if London-Edin is transferred to HS2, I wonder what that would mean for ECML north of Newcastle? Downgrading, de-electrification, perhaps even total closure between Morpeth and Dunbar?
Even if de-electrifying it did made financial sense, any persons suggesting such would immediately be branded "Beeching" and would have committed almost certain political suicide.
One way Network Rail was justifying it was that HS2 would remove the long distance inter-city trains, freeing up space for commuter trains and freight traffic.
For HS2 going via the North East (Leeds and Newcastle) the following was said:
However, I would also point out Kevo00 that not all people heading to Edinburgh/North Scotland on the ECML originated in London - I assume a small but significant source is still the North East (Sheffield, Leeds, Newcastle etc) who won't use HSL2 to get to Edinburgh and the further north...Network Rail wrote:The London-North East & Scotland option would free up additional train capacity on
the East Coast Main Line and Midland Main Line. However, at present there is no
requirement to provide additional passenger capacity on these lines due to planned
schemes.
Some other interesting sound bites
Network Rail wrote: What about a connection to HS1?
A physical connection to HS1 will lead to a small modal shift from air to rail.
However, the same can be achieved through a simple interchange, particularly
if the London terminal was at or near St Pancras. A physical connection will be
expensive, operationally difficult and will be detrimental to the overall business
case – most people will want to go to London, not Europe.