Buenos Aires train crash (22 feb)
Moderator: General Forums Moderators
- nicfer
- Director
- Posts: 529
- Joined: 03 May 2005 20:50
- Location: Somewhere in a country called Argentina
Buenos Aires train crash (22 feb)
Hi.
Anyone heard about the train crash in Buenos Aires? It happened 10 days ago but nobody posted about that, so I'll start a late topic.
One of the formations was unable to break somehow and crashed against the bumpers, which wasn't working and caused the second wagon to crush against the header one and causing most of the 51 deaths plus over 700 injuried. Like most of the railways here in Argentina it suffers the lack of maintanance, abandonment and overload of both rails and vehicles.
Anyone heard about the train crash in Buenos Aires? It happened 10 days ago but nobody posted about that, so I'll start a late topic.
One of the formations was unable to break somehow and crashed against the bumpers, which wasn't working and caused the second wagon to crush against the header one and causing most of the 51 deaths plus over 700 injuried. Like most of the railways here in Argentina it suffers the lack of maintanance, abandonment and overload of both rails and vehicles.
Sorry for my english I am argentinian
TTO don't crashes in Windows XP; XP crashes TTO
Formerly known as UnderBuilder.
MyMiniCity
TTO don't crashes in Windows XP; XP crashes TTO
Formerly known as UnderBuilder.
MyMiniCity
- 61653
- Tycoon
- Posts: 2095
- Joined: 29 Sep 2009 09:13
- Location: Batley, the People's Republic of West Yorkshire.
Re: Buenos Aires train crash (22 feb)
I saw the news coverage about this, I was surprised at how high the death-toll was considering it was (AFAIK) a fairly low-speed buffer-overrun, though I imagine this may have been down to how crowded the train was. Seems that there is a number of issues about who is responsible for maintenance and upgrades: the private or public sector- much like we had (and to an extent still have) in the UK. The rolling stock involved didn't look massively outdated, and certainly more substantial than A LOT of the lower-quality stock we have in the UK, so I was shocked at how many injuries/deaths were caused, and how much damage. My thoughts are with those involved and their families of course.
I was social distancing before it was cool
Formerly known as 47434
Last train journey I could be bothered to look up the headcode for: 04/02/2016, Mirfield to Batley, 2J34 1459 Huddersfield to Leeds, Northern Rail 144015

Formerly known as 47434
Last train journey I could be bothered to look up the headcode for: 04/02/2016, Mirfield to Batley, 2J34 1459 Huddersfield to Leeds, Northern Rail 144015
Re: Buenos Aires train crash (22 feb)
Hit at 16 mph.47434 wrote:I was surprised at how high the death-toll was considering it was (AFAIK) a fairly low-speed buffer-overrun
- Level Crossing
- Tycoon
- Posts: 1187
- Joined: 07 Feb 2011 22:04
- Location: East Coast, United States
Re: Buenos Aires train crash (22 feb)
Does Argentina not have train safety standards? (the US has very strict ones, but that has saved lives many times)
Like my avatar? See my screenshot thread
Re: Buenos Aires train crash (22 feb)
Well of course they'll have safety standards, but the mere presence of such standards does not mean that accidents cannot happen.Level Crossing wrote:Does Argentina not have train safety standards? (the US has very strict ones, but that has saved lives many times)
- Level Crossing
- Tycoon
- Posts: 1187
- Joined: 07 Feb 2011 22:04
- Location: East Coast, United States
Re: Buenos Aires train crash (22 feb)
I meant that a train that crashes into anything at 16 mph should not lead to such a death toll.
Like my avatar? See my screenshot thread
Re: Buenos Aires train crash (22 feb)
Also accidents that happened at Higher speeds had smaller death tolls. (Grayrigg, 90 mph and falls down embankment, 1 death, Big Bayou Canot, speed unknown (locos able to do 103 mph) and falls off Bridge, 47 Deaths). Yes these accidents happened in Countries where safety is the Priority, but they also happened at Higher Speeds.
Re: Buenos Aires train crash (22 feb)
It's not the speed that matters, but the deceleration.
Trains have huge momentums - so you can't compare the speed with that of a car during a crash. Your car has seat belts and massive crumple zones given the momentum, trains have neither.
Grayrigg didn't crash into anything as such - it derailed and rolled down an embankment. Big Bayou Canot crashed into the bridge. Eschede train also derailed then hit a bridge - killed 101.
Trains have huge momentums - so you can't compare the speed with that of a car during a crash. Your car has seat belts and massive crumple zones given the momentum, trains have neither.
Grayrigg didn't crash into anything as such - it derailed and rolled down an embankment. Big Bayou Canot crashed into the bridge. Eschede train also derailed then hit a bridge - killed 101.
John Mitchell
http://www.johnmit.net
http://www.johnmit.net
- Level Crossing
- Tycoon
- Posts: 1187
- Joined: 07 Feb 2011 22:04
- Location: East Coast, United States
Re: Buenos Aires train crash (22 feb)
There were 14 deaths when an Amtrak train at Chase, Maryland crashed into three locomotives. The train was moving at 108 mph.
In 2008, a commuter train crashed head-on into a freight and 25 people died. However, the relative speed was 80 mph, not 15.
In 2008, a commuter train crashed head-on into a freight and 25 people died. However, the relative speed was 80 mph, not 15.
Like my avatar? See my screenshot thread
Re: Buenos Aires train crash (22 feb)
Probably the best comparison is with the Cannon Street crash in 1991 - where a train hit the buffers at 10mph, but two were killed and 524 injured.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannon_Str ... rail_crash
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannon_Str ... rail_crash
Re: Buenos Aires train crash (22 feb)
No, Argentina has no safety standards for trains. It's system is 40 years outdated, since no investments were made over those years. it's signalling system is even older, and in some tracks, the maximum speed is limited to 20km/h (due to bad state).
The reason for that high death toll is that wagons "telescoped". Recent investigations showed the wagons traveled at different heights (up to 9cm), making telescoping easier in case of collision.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telescoping_(railway)
There also has been said that the station buffers didn't work at the time of the crash.
If you add the amount of people traveling at that time, you have that death toll. Those trains travel at FULL capacity (meaning that people literally push as hard as they can to enter the trains, and even so, sometimes they can't even achieve it).
There's a picture took by a rescue firemen (and published by a local newspaper) showing what happened inside the wagons that telescoped (travelling packed of people).
(Warning, it may seem graphic to some people)
http://bucket1.clanacion.com.ar/anexos/ ... 16w645.jpg
The reason for that high death toll is that wagons "telescoped". Recent investigations showed the wagons traveled at different heights (up to 9cm), making telescoping easier in case of collision.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telescoping_(railway)
There also has been said that the station buffers didn't work at the time of the crash.
If you add the amount of people traveling at that time, you have that death toll. Those trains travel at FULL capacity (meaning that people literally push as hard as they can to enter the trains, and even so, sometimes they can't even achieve it).
There's a picture took by a rescue firemen (and published by a local newspaper) showing what happened inside the wagons that telescoped (travelling packed of people).
(Warning, it may seem graphic to some people)
http://bucket1.clanacion.com.ar/anexos/ ... 16w645.jpg
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests