Higher level NFO?

[DaleStan]

The parentheses. Encode them as (*poke*prod*) %28 and %29, and everything will work.

WhiteSpace

[nilsi]

Also cheap to print for archival purposes. Not much expensive ink is needed :-)

[Red*Star]

Even producing something like this

Code: Select all

1001100011110010110001111110100010001101010
0100011000111110111110100100010000000010000
101001010000101010100101000101010 ...

would be filed under "programming".

regards
Michael

And even a piece of romeo and juliet: SPL

I don't think this leads us to something useful... /I/ would define "programming" or "not programming" also by practical issues, but that's my very own point of view. Let's instead go back to the higher-level nfo topic, that's a less philosophic issue

[jvassie]

Actually, you know what's interesting? Jonty, WhiteHand and I are all active users of GRFMaker, we're all under 18, and we all have zero to minimal programming experiance. Okay, I have a bit more than 'minimal', but anyways, it again shows, using GRFMaker isn't _hard_, but it isn't trivial.

Creating grf files is never (In my oppinion) going to get to the point where it's just 'push a few buttons and ZOMG! ITS TEH .GRF FILE', It's just something you have to put a bit of effort into learning.

Aegir, your right there, i mean there are others who regularly use it who are <18 too, myself for instance. I have a very small amount of programming knowledge, PASCAL and a bit of BASIC, my main knowledge is in the way of html.

[Red*Star]

very small amount of programming knowledge, PASCAL and a bit of BASIC, my main knowledge is in the way of html.

Reminds me of me when I was <18 . And many other people probably also started like this. And then, after some time, they settled a programmers carrier on top :lol