Which version Of Windows is the best

Big Mad Tony · Post by **Big Mad Tony** » 11 Jan 2003 18:49

CombatGold1 wrote:Windows XP is a piece of s***!

I agree.

SHADOW-XIII · Post by **SHADOW-XIII** » 11 Jan 2003 18:50

Rob wrote:The best version of windows was made by

Apple.

I don't like Apples ... neither friuts and software ... (software looks strange)

Post by **orudge** » 11 Jan 2003 20:29

Arathorn wrote:But it didn't even want to install. Any way around that?

Set compatibility mode on the installation program.

Observer · Post by **Observer** » 12 Jan 2003 11:26

CombatGold1 wrote:Windows XP is a piece of s***!

Windows 2000 is the best of them all but they all suck. 3.1 is the most stable (or 3.11).

LINUX BEATS WINDOWS!!!!

About linux may be right.. but if you have tried every single windows version ( *COUGH* like me ). You'll notice windows XP really is the best of all windowses...

tcbil · Post by **tcbil** » 12 Jan 2003 12:57

listen we all know thatlinux is a lot better than windows, i totally agree, but some people or can not install it or dont have time to learn it and in that case we give them advice on what would be better to install, i thinks its or win 2000 (if you can do all the configurations for the network and stuff like that on your own) and win xp if you cant be bovered because he does everything automaticly

CombatGold1 · Post by **CombatGold1** » 12 Jan 2003 13:14

Big Mad Tony wrote:
CombatGold1 wrote:Windows XP is a piece of s***!
I agree.

Thank you.

Observer wrote:
CombatGold1 wrote:
Windows XP is a piece of s***!

Windows 2000 is the best of them all but they all suck. 3.1 is the most stable (or 3.11).

LINUX BEATS WINDOWS!!!!
About linux may be right.. but if you have tried every single windows version ( *COUGH* like me ). You'll notice windows XP really is the best of all windowses...

Not really, it does crash on me and it doesn't run my programs as good as Windows 2000 does.

spaceman-spiff · Post by **spaceman-spiff** » 12 Jan 2003 18:29

Windows XP never cashes here, i run Seti the whole day, when i get back in the evening it still runs

I can play all my favorite games, why would i complain !

SHADOW-XIII · Post by **SHADOW-XIII** » 12 Jan 2003 18:48

spaceman-spiff wrote:Windows XP never cashes here, i run Seti the whole day, when i get back in the evening it still runs

I can play all my favorite games, why wuld i complain !

I don't understand people who complain to Win XP ... never crash, all games I want work ... it's nearly perfect

CombatGold1 · Post by **CombatGold1** » 12 Jan 2003 23:10

I can leave my Windows 2000 on for 3 months without a crash, freeze or things like that.

Omnislash · Post by **Omnislash** » 13 Jan 2003 15:07

About linux may be right.. but if you have tried every single windows version ( *COUGH* like me ). You'll notice windows XP really is the best of all windowses...

CombatGold1 wrote:Not really, it does crash on me and it doesn't run my programs as good as Windows 2000 does.

Either you don't use it right or you have funny hardware. It is certainly the best windows made. Its not a opinion its a fact. You can't test it on one pc and say its crap. It will differ from pc to pc. As it happens it works great on all my pcs. Well the 2 i have it on

Observer · Post by **Observer** » 14 Jan 2003 12:54

Win2000

advantages:
Its smaller, lighter so its faster

disadvantages:
Its less consumer-oriented, its UGLY and it crahed at my pc more often than XP.

Also.. I have a laptop, that means plugging in and plugging out of the network the entire time. Try that in win2000, it takes 2 days to see another computer on the net compared to 2seconds in XP.

Omnislash · Post by **Omnislash** » 14 Jan 2003 23:04

Observer wrote: Also.. I have a laptop, that means plugging in and plugging out of the network the entire time. Try that in win2000, it takes 2 days to see another computer on the net compared to 2seconds in XP.

I know what you mean. Sometimes there are pcs missing in the workgroup when I know for a fact there on and working. The shortcuts work just not the direct links. Silly windows.

Marco · Post by **Marco** » 15 Jan 2003 13:17

orudge wrote:and probably some other versions.

Longhorn?

However Windows sucks.

Too much names: I prefer the old number system (1.0, 2.0, ecc)...how can you know if version XP is newer or older than ME?

SHADOW-XIII · Post by **SHADOW-XIII** » 15 Jan 2003 13:19

Marco however XP is better than ME

XP have number NT 5 ..

Omnislash · Post by **Omnislash** » 15 Jan 2003 15:58

Windows 2000 is NT5. XP is NT 5.1.

SHADOW-XIII · Post by **SHADOW-XIII** » 15 Jan 2003 16:01

Sorry you are right .. 5.1 (mine is 5.1(build 2600) )

Omnislash · Post by **Omnislash** » 15 Jan 2003 16:04

CombatGold1 · Post by **CombatGold1** » 15 Jan 2003 17:46

I like my Win2k, but when I get my new hard disk I'm gonna put things like this.

Disk 1 (New 120 GB).
> Partition 1 - Windows 2000 - Including BootMagic for multiple booting.
> Partition 2 - Backup.

Disk 2 (New 20 GB).
> Partition 1 - Mandrake Linux.

Nicely sorted.

Observer · Post by **Observer** » 16 Jan 2003 22:31

I have 6 partitions... thats even more nicely sorted....

Omnislash · Post by **Omnislash** » 16 Jan 2003 22:35

I have 4. Easier when you come to format.

Transport Tycoon Forums

Which version Of Windows is the best

Which version Of Windows is the best

Who is online