Errrr no. This is not a survey in the sense that they asked people to vote on the internet. Actually it is much closer to the methodology you propose. Re-read the website, particularly the bit at the bottom where it tells you what the methodology was, before ranting about imaginary people wasting their dad's money in an internet cafe. By the way, last time I went to an internet cafe, it was mostly full of 'hardworking' people emailing home.athanasios wrote:Another pseudo-statistic. No my friend things aren't measured that way. There are major flaws here:Kevo00 wrote:http://www.citymayors.com/economics/exp ... ties2.html Again because you will not understand/accept statistics... I do care for the less privileged; that's why I believe in measuring things properly.
How many people do have the luxury of internet at home to vote there? The poor hardworking ones do not even have an idea about that webpage, not to mention that many may not even know what is a webpage. Just another survey where the majority voting are wasting their dad's money in an internet cafe. The real way to make a survey is by asking people either on the road or by phone. And still it won't be a statistic. It will be just a survey.
To find out if a city is expensive or cheap you have to do 2 things:
a: Find out what is the average salary of the inhabitants (excluding very rich ones).
b. Find out what is the average price of various products and services in that city.
c: Compare the buying value of the salary (after excluding taxes) of a citizen of town x with that of a citizen in town z.
Weighted meaning that the different products in the basket were calculated in the proportion to which people are likely to pay for them out of their income.City Mayors wrote:Methodology
The cost of a weighted shopping basket geared to Western European consumer habits containing 122 goods and services including rent.
Incidentally, the related page ranking the 150 richest cities by GDP also shows Athens as 70th in the world.
Rdrdrdrd, I don't get your argument. Can you please tell us why you think spending less money (or no money) on public goods and banning insurance would help stimulate economic growth? I don't get it. If you close parks and schools, property values will collapse for starters.
As for McCain, actually I don't think his policies are bad but he has saddled himself with a mad gun-nut candidate for VP who doesn't appeal to anyone but Republicans. Also he suffers from the problem that the previous Republican govts were too divisive in trying to govern for the 'good people' who actually constitute a minority in the US, albeit a very loud one. I don't see why Republicans are scared of Democrats banning guns, because banning guns in the US would be like banning cars, television, or the internet - extreme and political suicide.