Page 1 of 3

Romanian Set

Posted: 21 Apr 2007 06:00
by CMircea
I decided to create a Romanian graphics set, which will replace all trains and buses in the game. This is my first set, so don't expect much quality, but I'll do my best.

I will include trains from other countries, as we don't have a big history of trains and the steam trains were mostly brought from other countries. BUt for buses, we have a lot of them around here.

So far I have made the first-stage wagon, in blue color. I want to make it dual company color, but I'm not sure which color is for 1st CC and which is for 2nd CC. Any help?

Posted: 21 Apr 2007 07:39
by Purno
For the 2cc info:

Posted: 21 Apr 2007 08:19
by michael blunck
Why are you guys always posting the palette in the wrong order? :evil:

This would cause misunderstandings if people are referencing to pallette entry numbers.

See for the correct (windows) palette: http://wiki.ttdpatch.net/tiki-index.php ... oordinates

regards
Michael

Posted: 21 Apr 2007 10:02
by CMircea
OMG, that looks so messy. The 'private' one looks nicer.

@Purno: Thanks for that and for your tutorial! /me goes back to drawing.

EDIT: Passenger Coach MK-I in 2CC attached. Now: All my graphics are free to use in any set unless stated otherwise. Hope it's clear enough.

Posted: 21 Apr 2007 11:12
by Purno
michael blunck wrote:Why are you guys always posting the palette in the wrong order? :evil:
First of all there's no need to get angry ;)

Second of all, this is the pallette I've been working with from the start, assumingly the DOS Pallette. He also seems to be using it, so it was a logical step to post the same DOS pallete file.

Posted: 21 Apr 2007 11:55
by michael blunck
Desolator wrote:OMG, that looks so messy. The 'private' one looks nicer.
Pardon? What you´re calling "messy" are just additional helpful explanations. That´s why Oskar has "sliced up" some of the colour areas. This has nothing to do with the colour entry ranking.
Purno wrote:this is the pallette I've been working with from the start, assumingly the DOS Pallette. He also seems to be using it, so it was a logical step to post the same DOS pallete file.
I do know the DOS palette very well. Nevertheless you´re showing it upside down and mirrored.

The correct DOS palette is attached. Please use this arrangement when advising new users.

regards
Michael

Posted: 21 Apr 2007 14:39
by Dave
michael blunck wrote:
Desolator wrote:OMG, that looks so messy. The 'private' one looks nicer.
Pardon? What you´re calling "messy" are just additional helpful explanations. That´s why Oskar has "sliced up" some of the colour areas. This has nothing to do with the colour entry ranking.
Have some respect for Michael, Desolator. He's been drawing sprites for TTD a lot longer than you have.

Form follows function, gentlemen, form follows function.

Posted: 21 Apr 2007 14:41
by CMircea
Mind posting a 20x20 version? Irfanview will mess the colors with Lanczos filter (others will do even worse), and without resampling the color squares are randomly resized :? or even better, the Windows palette in 20x20, please?

Posted: 21 Apr 2007 16:41
by michael blunck
Desolator wrote:Mind posting a 20x20 version? Irfanview will mess the colors with Lanczos filter (others will do even worse), and without resampling the color squares are randomly resized :? or even better, the Windows palette in 20x20, please?
What exactly is your problem?

regards
Michael

Posted: 21 Apr 2007 16:49
by CMircea
Nevermind that, I forgot that I could flip Purno's palette. Is there any palce to find the Windows palette (I know that GRFcodec can convert from DOS to Win and vice versa, but I'd like to have it in a separate PNG file)?

Posted: 21 Apr 2007 17:40
by PikkaBird
Here you go, here is my (slightly modified) win palette.

Posted: 21 Apr 2007 20:47
by CMircea
I have just finished a Diesel loco and a DMU, more specifically Class 82 and Class 77. The DMU doesn't have the lighting effects as the diesel loco 'cuz was lazy, since they're time-consuming.

The Diesel loco was drawn before the DMU, and here are the pics:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:CFR_ ... motive.jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:CFR_class_77_DMU.jpg

I attached the PNGs (2CC, DOS palette).

Posted: 21 Apr 2007 21:04
by lifeblood
The class 82 looks like a good start, but it is still too 'clean' and plain looking.

Posted: 21 Apr 2007 21:09
by CMircea
Not bad for first loco though. I'm not sure what detail to put, since the sprites are small.

Posted: 21 Apr 2007 21:41
by PikkaBird
Desolator wrote:Not bad for first loco though. I'm not sure what detail to put, since the sprites are small.
You've obviously got the dimensions down perfect, which is half the battle. :D I had a quick go at a side view to give you some sort of idea of the detailing you can put in. The side view generally has the most detail in it - the diagonal views can be trickier.

(Note I only found a couple of photos of this loco, so it might not be terribly accurate.)

Posted: 22 Apr 2007 06:27
by CMircea
I changed the side & | views. I must say that the | look kinda odd.

@the diagonal views: I guess that Photshop's perspective feature can come in handy.

Posted: 22 Apr 2007 08:41
by Purno
Eh... how come it looks like a different engine now?

Posted: 22 Apr 2007 09:08
by eis_os
May I ask what benefit the posted pcx file has? If you download the png (because browsers will convert it to true color sometimes) and open it you will see it has a TTD Windows palette...

Posted: 22 Apr 2007 12:45
by Korenn
eis_os wrote:May I ask what benefit the posted pcx file has? If you download the png (because browsers will convert it to true color sometimes) and open it you will see it has a TTD Windows palette...
didn't you just give the benefit yourself?

Posted: 22 Apr 2007 14:54
by CMircea
eis_os wrote:May I ask what benefit the posted pcx file has? If you download the png (because browsers will convert it to true color sometimes) and open it you will see it has a TTD Windows palette...
I'm confused. Some say it the DOS palette, other say it's the Windows one. :?