Page 1 of 1
question about train size
Posted: 26 Mar 2006 06:52
by bighust
so does it matter if you have 2 trains with 5 cars going from one place to anthoer or one train with 10 cars?
Posted: 26 Mar 2006 07:02
by DaleStan
Yes.
Posted: 26 Mar 2006 07:08
by bighust
whats the difference?
Posted: 26 Mar 2006 07:25
by DaleStan
One is cheaper (both to buy and to run); the other results in better station ratings, and hence more cargo to transport, and more income, to offset the larger purchase and running costs.
Posted: 26 Mar 2006 07:38
by bighust
thx
Posted: 26 Mar 2006 07:51
by PikkaBird
And two trains will get in the way of other trains more (and/or use up more land) than one train.
Posted: 26 Mar 2006 08:31
by stevenh
the sky is blue.
Posted: 26 Mar 2006 08:48
by PikkaBird
stevenh wrote:the sky is blue.
No it isn't, it's black.
Posted: 26 Mar 2006 10:36
by Aegir
HAH! You all lie! Everyone knows it's a pale baby-puke green!
Posted: 26 Mar 2006 10:40
by eis_os
Could the regulars please stop this spam and let that topic die peaceful.
Posted: 26 Mar 2006 11:00
by michael blunck
> Could the regulars please stop this spam and let that topic die peaceful.
There“s a way to calculate it by use of graph theory.
regards
Michael
Posted: 26 Mar 2006 20:12
by Altern8or
Another thing is that if you have 1 long train, say, instead of two, you will lose cargo at your feeder station as the one train is away from it more.
Posted: 27 Mar 2006 16:45
by Uwe
It surely makes a difference: A short train is lighter, can accelerate faster and has less problems with mountains. This results in faster transport and hence more income. On the other hand, longer trains can carry more on a single run, which also has an obvious influence on income. In the end, it's probably all a matter of trial and error.