Transport Tycoon Forums

hthhs wrote:

ChillCore wrote: On behalf of the people using the patch, thank you.
Would you mind sharing how it is different from the previous version. (I have not yet compared the code with the previous version.)

- The code that removed passengers going via INVALID_STATION (i.e. the ones going via anywhere) has been removed - testing showed that it wasn't necessary.
- The patch no longer inadvertently disables the second pass of the MCF solver.
- Minor things (indentation and comments) that don't affect the operation of the patch.

MagicBuzz wrote: I'll try to find out how works the ICU library in order to make my patch "locale compliant". But I can't promise anything, I'm really underskilled in C++ and it looks like quite complex to use.

But for v11 or your patchpack, I'll merge strcmp file and strnat file, it's a good idea.

Edit : Where is strcmp() defined ? I found it in string.h, but it's not part of the OTTD source, but Visual Studio standard includes (??)

ColdIce wrote: 1. what is the no overload patch?
2. this was compatible with my savegame from previous build
3. build log http://www.heypasteit.com/clip/P6T
4. Thank you ChillCore for this patchpack
5. enjoy the win32 build guys!

Kogut wrote:

Coldice wrote: one tiny little huge problem:
in game newgrf window doesnt show the .grf list. I can`t add or remove newgrfs.

(svn r21111) -Add: Remove the buttons below the newgrf details if the list is not editable. (?)

ColdIce wrote:

Kogut wrote: <grumbling>It may be better to attach it as txt, not post on site with "you won an Ipod!" ads</grumbling>

@Kogut: it's just a banner! a small one. you can block it with adblock if you are using mozilla. the build log is for ChillCore and he didn`t complained before.

supermop wrote: Hey, I've been having trouble with the improved station GUI part when using the patch pack with my modular sheds. I know my sheds are troublesome enough on their own, but it seems like a specific issue with the patch. I will post pictures and details when I get back from work.

Best,

Kogut wrote:

ColdIce wrote:one tiny little huge problem:
in game newgrf window doesnt show the .grf list. I can`t add or remove newgrfs.

(svn r21111) -Add: Remove the buttons below the newgrf details if the list is not editable. (?)
In t21134 it is impossible to change newgrfs ingame, it can be activated via openttd.cfg [newgrf_developer_tools]

svn log wrote: planetmaker * r21116 /trunk/src/ (5 files in 2 dirs): -Add [FS#3012]: Reduce the chances to accidentially break savegames with NewGRFs

ColdIce wrote: in game newgrf window doesnt show the .grf list. I can`t add or remove newgrfs.

NekoMaster wrote:I dont really like the idea of disabling adding\removing newgrfs ingame because sometimes people just want to test stuff or add different graphics (or when updating old games with old grfs). Should just have a option in the difficulty or advanced options (and have it set to disabled by defualt)

NekoMaster wrote: I dont really like the idea of disabling adding\removing newgrfs ingame because sometimes people just want to test stuff or add different graphics (or when updating old games with old grfs). Should just have a option in the difficulty or advanced options (and have it set to disabled by defualt)

ColdIce wrote: I removed the build.. I`ve readed all, but i guess i missed that line with no win32 build . I thought you want from us to the test the game and find bugs. sorry

Nickel_Plate wrote: Towns and cities are still shrinking using daylenght, have posted comment to cargodist thread.

Using r21051_v10.7

ChillCore wrote:For me the way it is now is perfect and really the best solution to avoid the stream of false bugreports and Devs can concentrate on the real issues instead of wasting time on user errors.

Kogut wrote:

ChillCore wrote: For me the way it is now is perfect and really the best solution to avoid the stream of false bugreports and Devs can concentrate on the real issues instead of wasting time on user errors.

There will be explosion of bugreports about missing feature (but it will be easier to filter).

Nickel_Plate wrote: Bit of an update on my previous reply.

Been doing a bit of testing and i may be wrong but i don't seem to be getting any town growth with a DAYLENGTH above 14.

Above 14 you can see a steady shrinkage.

Nickel_Plate wrote: Bit more testing.

Noticed that shrinkage seems to be faster in 2 cities where i have TRAINS & BUSES running
but slower in 2 cities with only a couple of trains arriving every so often.

Yes willing to do some testing and i can compile having just reloaded Mingw.

In house.h:
----------
around line 122:
-	byte minimum_life;
+	uint16 minimum_life;

In town_cmd.cpp:
----------------
Around line 575:
	if ((hs->building_flags & BUILDING_HAS_1_TILE) &&
			HasBit(t->flags, TOWN_IS_FUNDED) &&
			CanDeleteHouse(tile) &&
-			GetHouseAge(tile) >= hs->minimum_life &&
+			GetHouseAge(tile) >= (hs->minimum_life * _date_daylength_factor) &&
			--t->time_until_rebuild == 0) {
		t->time_until_rebuild = GB(r, 16, 8) + 192;

Around line 1454:
-	t->time_until_rebuild = 10;
+	t->time_until_rebuild = 10 * _date_daylength_factor;

Around line 2611:
-		t->exclusive_counter = 12;
+		t->exclusive_counter = 12 * _date_daylength_factor;

Amaury[FR] wrote: Hello,

I would like to know if the savegame from 1.0.4 are now compatible ?

Thx

Have Fun