Transport Tycoon Forums

Clearly. I made a bridge set without thinking about doing it with custom bridge heads, but it turned out well. I noticed that the "Erasmus Bridge" looks ugly, you can easily get rid of it yourself, so as not to build a road intersection on the head of the bridge

ufiby wrote: ↑09 Mar 2021 14:44

• Feature: Labels for conventional rails are completely redesigned, narrow-gauge rails remain unchanged

• Add: Rail (Dual power)

• Add: Normal + Narrow Rail #2

• Add: Normal + Narrow Rail #2(Electrified)

• Changes: Normal+ Narrow Rail #1 Redone, will be available earlier if there is RAIL and NAAN

• Add: New parameters: Speed limit for Normal rail and Narrow Gauge rail

You did a great job!
Thank you so much for adding the electrified dual gauge that I requested !!!
I'm looking forward to it in the future.

ufiby wrote: ↑11 Mar 2021 17:55 Clearly. I made a bridge set without thinking about doing it with custom bridge heads, but it turned out well. I noticed that the "Erasmus Bridge" looks ugly, you can easily get rid of it yourself, so as not to build a road intersection on the head of the bridge

Maybe a parameter to disable the Miracle Bridge? I kind of want to code a bridge using the slot that would be freed up by that at some point in the future.

Also, could you add a parameter to U&ReRMM 2 to disable the dual gauge tracks? I've already got an "omni-gauge track" that supports standard gauge, broad gauge and every type of narrow gauge (with a suitably low top speed for game balance) and loading U&ReRMM 2 wastes two tracktype slots.

Thanks for all your good work!

You did a great job!
Thank you so much for adding the electrified dual gauge that I requested !!!
I'm looking forward to it in the future.

So glad you liked my set. Please!

Maybe a parameter to disable the Miracle Bridge? I kind of want to code a bridge using the slot that would be freed up by that at some point in the future.

Also, could you add a parameter to U&ReRMM 2 to disable the dual gauge tracks? I've already got an "omni-gauge track" that supports standard gauge, broad gauge and every type of narrow gauge (with a suitably low top speed for game balance) and loading U&ReRMM 2 wastes two tracktype slots.

Thanks for all your good work!

Thanks!. JRPG packages have free space 3 bridges, so you can use. Adding something and doing something with the use compatibility feature for the sake of other sets is unlikely

ufiby wrote: ↑13 Mar 2021 07:27

Maybe a parameter to disable the Miracle Bridge? I kind of want to code a bridge using the slot that would be freed up by that at some point in the future.

Also, could you add a parameter to U&ReRMM 2 to disable the dual gauge tracks? I've already got an "omni-gauge track" that supports standard gauge, broad gauge and every type of narrow gauge (with a suitably low top speed for game balance) and loading U&ReRMM 2 wastes two tracktype slots.

Thanks for all your good work!

Thanks!. JRPG packages have free space 3 bridges, so you can use. Adding something and doing something with the use compatibility feature for the sake of other sets is unlikely

Those three slots are already taken up by the modular bridges set, but okay.

Released minor updates!
U&RATT v0.5

• Change: Catenary redesigned and improved sprites

• Add: Added a custom tunnel

savegame compatible with previous version of U&RaTT v0.4

Thanks to the release of master 20210311, the catenary were redesigned. This replaces the original basic graphics, and so it looks better than a small annoying tunnel.
Graphic sprites tunnels supports in climate conditions, also with OpenGFX+Landscape 1.1.2 (you must select the subarctic climate and the Landscape type: alpine). It is possible to build almost the entire road through a tunnel, but the road paths associated with the full tile (such as ISR roads), this will not work. There is still another way to do this to avoid problems and ugly ones.
For example: To use with U&RaTT v0. 5, you need to download master-20210311 and the latest version

ufiby wrote: ↑13 Mar 2021 20:42 This replaces the original basic graphics, and so it looks better than a small annoying tunnel.
Graphic sprites tunnels supports in climate conditions, also with OpenGFX+Landscape 1.1.2 (you must select the subarctic climate and the Landscape type: alpine).

Your tunnel portal looks really good.
Just one nagging question though. They are still not roadtype and tramtype specific are they?

They are still not roadtype and tramtype specific are they?

no

I spotted a bug with the truss steel bridge


I spotted it first on my game with newgrfs (above) and then I tested it with only U&bridges, U&RaTT and U&reRRMM 2 with default settings (below) and the same glitch appeared. I did a bit of extra testing and it appears to be every bridge pillar over a tunnel that has an issue.

Ragin1_ wrote: ↑25 Mar 2021 11:29

Thank you for the information! I get it. I'm checking out the vanilla game without any sets, there are problems there too. This is not related to NewGRF. I have been closely observing how the tunnel sprites are drawn on top of the (visible) pillar sprites. Or another way to avoid unpleasant ones, like building bridges through tunnels so that the trunks don't get into the tunnel.
You can contact the developers to solve the problem.

Can you use U&ReRMM and U&ReRMM 2 together as it's a continuation or are they separate?

Maddog45353 wrote: ↑31 Mar 2021 21:47 Can you use U&ReRMM and U&ReRMM 2 together as it's a continuation or are they separate?

They're separate. Think of it like the original and the surprisingly improved sequel.

Can you use U&ReRMM and U&ReRMM 2 together as it's a continuation or are they separate?

They should be separated.

U&Bridge releases will be released soon. But I was more difficult to choose which bridge is better. I still have time for a week, and maybe sooner. I think 2 or 3 is best

For me 3

yeah, 3

What about making the bridge in company color?

1 and 2 are a little dark
4 is a little bright
3 is just right

Any, except 4 (bright and washed out).

Well, if no CC is possible, I like 2.

Any thoughts about adding a 4th rail variant, for use with London Underground stock?