http://newgrf-specs.tt-wiki.net/index.p ... oldid=2896 and http://vcs.openttd.org/git/?p=openttd/t ... 3484958e30Michi_cc wrote:We have a patch for that, so we could use if it makes sense.Eddi wrote:well the problem is that there is potentially an exponential explosion in the selections of available railtypes for the vehicle set to consider, which must be covered complex action 6/7/9/D, while with an alternative label list this is completely shielded from the vehicle set, and the railtype set has only linear size.
-- Michael Lutz