Page 5 of 6

Posted: 26 Jan 2003 22:32
by gasp
I use Microsoft Windows 2000 Professional with Service Pack 3. It's not so beautiful, but I think is the best OS released in the history.

Posted: 27 Jan 2003 07:19
by sordid
gasp wrote:I use Microsoft Windows 2000 Professional with Service Pack 3. It's not so beautiful, but I think is the best OS released in the history.
Yeah it would be the best if you've never tried anything else.

Posted: 27 Jan 2003 18:19
by Xeo
Win2000 isn't even in the "winOS top3"

Posted: 27 Jan 2003 20:43
by Tom Cumming
orudge wrote:
CombatGold1 wrote:WinXP = Double s***.
Windows Me is not particularly good, I agree with that. But XP is one of the most stable operating systems Microsoft has ever created! It's much more stable than Windows 1.x to Me, and, depending what you use it for, is more stable than 2000 (as I say, depending what you use it for).
The most stable Microsoft operating system has to be MS-DOS 3.3.

Posted: 27 Jan 2003 20:45
by Tom Cumming
lynsey wrote:Hardly any of my old games work in XP, which sucks cos most of my games are old. I'm used to it though cos I had ME before that, and ME was much worse cos the screen just went all squary (as in lots of squares I have no idea how to spell it, maybe squarey is actually)
I must have been lucky then - every single one of my old DOS games still work great under XP, admittedly in some cases with a bit of help from CPUKiller (to slow the processor speed down) or/and VDMSound (to emulate an older Soundblaster card.)

Posted: 27 Jan 2003 20:49
by Tom Cumming
orudge wrote:Our school used to have loads of BBC Micros (until the late 90s or so) - I think there might still be one or two lurking around in the primary classrooms!
I could never afford a BBC Micro, so I had it's cut down cheapo version, the Acorn Electron. No disk filing system, so audio cassettes are used for storage. Still works great - superb machine

Posted: 27 Jan 2003 22:23
by Observer
Strange to see this topic is still around... Im still on XP :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

Posted: 29 Jan 2003 20:48
by Xeo
98SE

Posted: 29 Jan 2003 21:25
by SHADOW-XIII
Xeo wrote:98SE
blah ... 9x suc** ...

Posted: 29 Jan 2003 21:30
by Xeo
:P

Posted: 29 Jan 2003 21:33
by Omnislash
SHADOW-XIII wrote:
Xeo wrote:98SE
blah ... 9x suc** ...
NT all the way!! :D :D

Posted: 29 Jan 2003 22:27
by lynsey
Tom Cumming wrote:I must have been lucky then - every single one of my old DOS games still work great under XP, admittedly in some cases with a bit of help from CPUKiller (to slow the processor speed down) or/and VDMSound (to emulate an older Soundblaster card.)
All I really wanna play is constructor, and I can't, it makes me sad all what I went to to get that game to work (I bought it, it didn't work, I took it back, got a replacement, got it half working, upgraded to the recommended rather than required cd rom speed...that killed that PC, it eventually worked on the replacement until that got MEd. Waaaah!)

Posted: 29 Jan 2003 22:30
by SHADOW-XIII
I wanted to play Constructor on Xp .. but it says soemthing error with my network ... (card or something like that) ... anyway ... who knows where can I dow**oad Constructor2 ??? :mrgreen:

Posted: 29 Jan 2003 22:41
by lynsey
The second one just isn't the same though, I've only played the demo, but it's just not right!

Posted: 29 Jan 2003 22:43
by SHADOW-XIII
I know the first was the best but I never play second .......
:shock: it is time to go to bed ... huh ... going to work early :( ... I will get here from work 8)

Posted: 29 Jan 2003 22:47
by lynsey
It's worth trying just to say bah, its not as good as it should've been. Why remake a classic with something that offers little more?

Posted: 29 Jan 2003 22:48
by SHADOW-XIII
Ok... if you say so ... but how to run Constructor at XP ???

Posted: 29 Jan 2003 22:52
by lynsey
I gave it a go and didn't have any luck, then I remembered it was a boot disk game so it was pointless even trying and gave up.

Posted: 29 Jan 2003 22:53
by SHADOW-XIII
hm... I will find out something ... 8)

EDITED: my 1400th post

Posted: 29 Jan 2003 22:53
by tcbil
hay you forgot 2000 in your choices