Posted: 21 Jun 2003 10:17
Aha, sort of a barge that is pulled by another boat ?
This way you can attach several just like waggons to a train
This way you can attach several just like waggons to a train
Transport Tycoon Forums
The place to talk about Transport Tycoon
https://www.tt-forums.net/
New suggestions for the patch (no new suggestions here!)
Page 37 of 47
Posted: 21 Jun 2003 10:29
Maybe he should explain it in more detail...
Posted: 21 Jun 2003 13:14
Ok,here it is 
Posted: 22 Jun 2003 09:39
Could you change those text's color to red or white?
It's quite hard to read them from that background
It's quite hard to read them from that background
Posted: 22 Jun 2003 09:51
ok, this is WITH boats :
:Posted: 26 Jun 2003 23:24
1. The realistic load/unload time in the patch has in my opinion a great mistake, passengers take too long. When you compare the unload/load times between a caol carrying train and a passenger train it takes a smaller amount of time to carry 60 tons (!) of coal in and out of the train than 80 passengers. Is it possible to increase the time for passengers? Maybe by the factor 2 or 4. For ships it works very well, the passenger liner from MB needs nearly the same time to load like the trains (and have in mind it can carry 500 passengers...). The same problem is there for the roadvehicles, a volvo bus from George with a max of 130 passengers is longer in a loading bay than on the road. Planes look o.k. for me.
2. Something that really makes me angry: why can´t TTD not count correct? It drives me mad when I see something like that, let the useless numbers fall away or (which would be much better
), teach TTD how to count properly.
2. Something that really makes me angry: why can´t TTD not count correct? It drives me mad when I see something like that, let the useless numbers fall away or (which would be much better
), teach TTD how to count properly.Posted: 27 Jun 2003 07:03
The last thing you are referring to hasn't got to do with counting but with keeping your vehicles ordered by numbers. It annoys me too and I wonder what causes it.
Posted: 27 Jun 2003 07:40
There could be:
Cht: List
or
Cht: SortList
Cht: List
or
Cht: SortList
Posted: 27 Jun 2003 13:08
Well that helped me out too, thanks Shadow! 
Posted: 27 Jun 2003 14:39
What are you thanking him fortroopper5 wrote:Well that helped me out too, thanks Shadow!
He just suggested a new cheat option not telling you an already present 'cheat'
Posted: 27 Jun 2003 14:52
I say 'could' ... but I do not think that any of Developers will create something like this because they have no time for this 'little' thingsDarkvater wrote:What are you thanking him fortroopper5 wrote:Well that helped me out too, thanks Shadow!
He just suggested a new cheat option not telling you an already present 'cheat'
Posted: 27 Jun 2003 15:13
Argh... I didn't try it after that but yepyep...
Posted: 27 Jun 2003 15:57
The list is somehow unsorted in the windows version,
Micheal is already complaining about this because his DB set will messed up. Yes Yes it will be soon finished but he dislikes to create two sets because of the non ordering.
Micheal is already complaining about this because his DB set will messed up. Yes Yes it will be soon finished but he dislikes to create two sets because of the non ordering.
Posted: 01 Jul 2003 06:30
These suggestions came from Shadow and Arathorn...
Shadow: Maybe electrified locos should 'spark' (errr) more often ?!? with electrified railways ... it would look great
Arathorn: Maybe only when it is winter. We can maybe also turn one of the two useless submarine "disasters" into electrics breaking by frost, only in winter.
Shadow: Maybe electrified locos should 'spark' (errr) more often ?!? with electrified railways ... it would look great
Arathorn: Maybe only when it is winter. We can maybe also turn one of the two useless submarine "disasters" into electrics breaking by frost, only in winter.
Posted: 02 Jul 2003 01:28
Why don't we allow the creation of bridges over deep gaps?, like a suspesion bridge between a ridge that it between two mountains? I also found it annoying that you had to put a track all the way down, and than all the way up to go up, and down a mountain.
Posted: 02 Jul 2003 03:49
I don't think that new disasters are possible, but this should be asked from Josef or someone else. This is just my opinion.G-Klav wrote:Arathorn: Maybe only when it is winter. We can maybe also turn one of the two useless submarine "disasters" into electrics breaking by frost, only in winter.
Posted: 02 Jul 2003 04:16
WillC20 wrote:Why don't we allow the creation of bridges over deep gaps?, like a suspesion bridge between a ridge that it between two mountains? I also found it annoying that you had to put a track all the way down, and than all the way up to go up, and down a mountain.
Read the manual
Its impossible
Posted: 02 Jul 2003 13:56
and where is it online, on josef's site all the links are down
Posted: 02 Jul 2003 14:47
I know that, I want it to be made possible.Stylesjl wrote:WillC20 wrote:Why don't we allow the creation of bridges over deep gaps?, like a suspesion bridge between a ridge that it between two mountains? I also found it annoying that you had to put a track all the way down, and than all the way up to go up, and down a mountain.
Read the manual
Its impossible
Posted: 02 Jul 2003 15:20
get a source code of TTDPatch and try make it possible yourselfWillC20 wrote:I know that, I want it to be made possible.Stylesjl wrote:WillC20 wrote:Why don't we allow the creation of bridges over deep gaps?, like a suspesion bridge between a ridge that it between two mountains? I also found it annoying that you had to put a track all the way down, and than all the way up to go up, and down a mountain.
Read the manual
Its impossible
