If you actually bothered to read the threads there is a revival of this idea which is being worked on.
Please dont dig up old threads that have died to ask a pretty useless question when you havent read active threads
Subsidiaries management (latest build: r7213)
Moderator: OpenTTD Developers
Re: Subsidiaries management (latest build: r7213)
I could nowhere find the download of a current SUBSIDIARIES version.
Could you guys,pls, post the link? I'd love to see the code, make a diff and help with testing - since it is a wonderful idea.
Thanx.
Ma
Could you guys,pls, post the link? I'd love to see the code, make a diff and help with testing - since it is a wonderful idea.
Thanx.
Ma
Re: Subsidiaries management (latest build: r7213)
Most recent version of Lord of the Pigs original patch is here http://www.tt-forums.net/viewtopic.php?p=615557#p615557, but even that is now pretty old.
There is also gagarins patch that I tried to update a bit here http://www.tt-forums.net/viewtopic.php?p=645900#p645900, but that does not have subsidiaries, only track sharing.
There is also gagarins patch that I tried to update a bit here http://www.tt-forums.net/viewtopic.php?p=645900#p645900, but that does not have subsidiaries, only track sharing.
Re: Subsidiaries management (latest build: r7213)
Any chance someone can make the subsidiary patch compatible with the latest code? I'm not too pushed about track sharing. I have tried to merge files myself but it just ends up being a mess and crashing out
Re: Subsidiaries management (latest build: r7213)
Axel90: i would rollback the source svn to a compatible revision and then just compile it, unless you want any newer feautures added ofcause 

Re: Subsidiaries management (latest build: r7213)
Yeah I have already done that..... Love the game but would be nice to get in the new features. lol
Thanks anyway Echo51, the sentiment is much appreciated.

Re: Subsidiaries management (latest build: r7213)
It's practically impossible to get this patch updated. Try the Infrastructure Sharing (IS) patch instead, which is more up to date.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests