The place to talk about Transport Tycoon
https://www.tt-forums.net/
That sounds very similar to my clicking on train station crash. I couldn't figure out yet what's the cause because I can't get the .diff from here to compile to a clean debug build.- I can't click on an intercontinental Airport without a hard crash of openttd.
Maybe this can help you.Indiana wrote:Bugs on Multiplayer Session:
- I can't click on an intercontinental Airport without a hard crash of openttd.
Code: Select all
..\src\economy.cpp(1224) : error C2666: 'OverflowSafeInt::operator /' : 4 overloads have similar conversions
with
[
T=int64,
T_MAX=0x7fffffffffffffff,
T_MIN=0x800000000
]
e:\source\src\core/overflowsafe_type.hpp(92): could be 'OverflowSafeInt OverflowSafeInt::operator /(const uint) const'
with
[
T=int64,
T_MAX=0x7fffffffffffffff,
T_MIN=0x800000000
]
e:\source\src\core/overflowsafe_type.hpp(91): or 'OverflowSafeInt OverflowSafeInt::operator /(const int) const'
with
[
T=int64,
T_MAX=0x7fffffffffffffff,
T_MIN=0x800000000
]
e:\source\src\core/overflowsafe_type.hpp(90): or 'OverflowSafeInt OverflowSafeInt::operator /(const OverflowSafeInt &) const'
with
[
T=int64,
T_MAX=0x7fffffffffffffff,
T_MIN=0x800000000
]
or 'built-in C++ operator/(int64, byte)'
while trying to match the argument list '(Money, byte)'
The compiler does not find a division operator matching exactly the types given, but 4 operators it can reach by a conversion, but it doesn't know which of them to take. Try casting the second argument of the division (i.e. the divisor) to either uint, int or Money. All of them should work. The fourth (which would require casting the first argument to int64) is no good choice. I wonder why gcc can resolve it and whether VE2008 or gcc is right according to the C++ standard.broodje wrote: Is there a way I can find out what is causing this problem?
It is possible, i would love that too.trainmaster611 wrote:Is it possible that someone could release the full r12180 package with this patch already applied, or is there something that prevents that from happening?
Ok, I'm a little confused. Are you saying that that link that says r12180 built with BOTTD, already has the patch applied to it?Trond wrote:what patch? The patchpack have already a win32 binary fro r12180 on page 1... Or did you want just one patch of the lot or?
Yes. All the patches listed in the 1st page.trainmaster611 wrote:Ok, I'm a little confused. Are you saying that that link that says r12180 built with BOTTD, already has the patch applied to it?
I'm afraid it won't be easy to apply the patch to the latest nightly build, because I'm afraid automatic patching will fail in several places so you will have to patch these places manually, which requires programming knowledge and is a lot of work.Two5Kid wrote:I need to ask this, if I were to add one of the nightlies onto this patch, (in order to play with the Canadian Set for OTTD), would I remove any of Gonozal's features, most importantly the PBS and dynamic engines?
It's time that Gonzal_VIII would do it, apply his patchpack to fresh nightlies and update patches that has been updataded in the meantime.Tekky wrote:...I'm afraid automatic patching will fail in several places so you will have to patch these places manually,...
I don't consider your tone appropriate. Instead of demanding that Gonozal should invest more work into his patchpack ("It's time that..."), it would be more meaningful that you thank him for his previous work and kindly ask if he or someone else could update the patchpack, or do it yourself if you have the programming knowledge.sickie wrote:It's time that Gonzal_VIII would do it, apply his patchpack to fresh nightlies and update patches that has been updataded in the meantime.Tekky wrote:...I'm afraid automatic patching will fail in several places so you will have to patch these places manually,...
Well, non-native speakers sometimes get the intonation wrong, perhaps that was the problem. And of course he's thankful for Gonozal's work, other wise he wouldn't be back for a new version!Tekky wrote:I don't consider your tone appropriate. Instead of demanding that Gonozal should invest more work into his patchpack ("It's time that..."), it would be more meaningful that you thank him for his previous work and kindly ask if he or someone else could update the patchpack, or do it yourself if you have the programming knowledge.sickie wrote:It's time that Gonzal_VIII would do it, apply his patchpack to fresh nightlies and update patches that has been updataded in the meantime.Tekky wrote:...I'm afraid automatic patching will fail in several places so you will have to patch these places manually,...
