Page 2 of 3
Posted: 02 Dec 2002 00:02
by Mati

GREAT IDEA !!!

It seems as my preasures to introduce a new 'rank' system has been worthfull
![Pleased :]](./images/smilies/pleased.gif)
Well, i've got my rank in the location thing delete, because I dont need it any more!
Well, this method has it's pro's and con's. But in my opinion more pro's than con's..
Posted: 02 Dec 2002 07:33
by spaceman-spiff
way_2_fun, new avatar ?
you change a lot, what's the reason for this one ?
Posted: 02 Dec 2002 10:19
by Observer
spaceman-spiff wrote:way_2_fun, new avatar ?
you change a lot, what's the reason for this one ?
GoneWacko changes his avatar once in a while too...

1 It brings kinda variety into the avatars .. thats a ++
2 Its harder to recognise someone in the end... thats a --

Posted: 02 Dec 2002 13:36
by GoneWacko
got me a new one again

Posted: 02 Dec 2002 19:58
by Arundel
We're going off topic!*!
How about these ranks, no one could get 3000+ post, not even with the word game!*!
These are how my ranks would look!

!
Bankrupt: 0
Engineer: 1-50
Traffic Manager: 51-100
Transport Coordinator: 101-150
Route Supervisor: 151-250
Director: 251-500
Chief Executive: 501-850
Chairman: 851+
President: Moderator
Tycoon: Adminastrators
(It gets harder as you go on!*!)
P.S. Observer has made his own rank!*!
[edit] not many people have more than 500!*! [/edit]
Posted: 02 Dec 2002 20:07
by Paranoid Android
I think there should be some in 4 digits. I'm sure some people will get to the top soon, then we have nowhere to aim. Maybe you could have 2000 as Isambard Kingdom Brunel or something.
Posted: 02 Dec 2002 21:24
by Observer
Tombe wrote:I think there should be some in 4 digits. I'm sure some people will get to the top soon, then we have nowhere to aim. Maybe you could have 2000 as Isambard Kingdom Brunel or something.
Ha then spaceman would already be that.....

Posted: 03 Dec 2002 00:55
by way_2_fun
spaceman-spiff wrote:way_2_fun, new avatar ?
you change a lot, what's the reason for this one ?
I get tired of othere ones, I visited the forum everyday, and I'd like to see something new. There's no reason for this one, as for the others.

We should have a joker for the people who always get off topic. And they could post a couple jokes sometimes. (I'd like to be one

)
Posted: 03 Dec 2002 02:13
by spaceman-spiff
Lol, then we will all have jokers
And reaching 3000 posts is not that difficult
if someone can reach 500 in a week, then 3000 is done in a month
Posted: 03 Dec 2002 02:26
by Lilman424
Put extra ranks to like 1 for post count another for how they act (good for keeping mean people off the boards

) one for whether their post are serious:
Crazy:1 post in 100 serious (observer and mati

)
Fun-loving:1 post in 50 serious
Average:1 post in 25 serious
Serious:1 post in 10 serious
Down-to-Earth:1 post in 2 serious (me, no seriously!

)
Posted: 03 Dec 2002 02:42
by spaceman-spiff
As Owen replied to me, this is impossible to maintain
I like it the way it is, with the TT names
I would have liked to be tycoon, but now i'm only mod
Posted: 03 Dec 2002 02:43
by Lilman424
HeHe i read that reply before a got the "Topic Reply Notification" E-mail
Posted: 03 Dec 2002 03:44
by way_2_fun
Lilman424 wrote:HeHe i read that reply before a got the "Topic Reply Notification" E-mail
I hate those things, they are good, but a 100 of them come to my inbox and use half of my account limit. I forget to "unwatch" them........

Posted: 03 Dec 2002 04:27
by Mati
Lilman424 wrote:
Crazy:1 post in 100 serious (observer and mati

)
Fun-loving:1 post in 50 serious
Im actually a Fun-loving user...

Still very far from being a serious one..
BTW, if 1 in 100 is serious, whats? 1 in 1000?

Thats Observer

Posted: 03 Dec 2002 05:05
by sultana
Mati wrote:Lilman424 wrote:
Crazy:1 post in 100 serious (observer and mati

)
Fun-loving:1 post in 50 serious
Im actually a Fun-loving user...

Still very far from being a serious one..
BTW, if 1 in 100 is serious, whats? 1 in 1000?

Thats Observer

lol, than he's still yet to post a serious post

won't be long though

Posted: 03 Dec 2002 10:19
by Observer
I have posted a few serious posts yet.....

Posted: 03 Dec 2002 17:14
by CombatGold1
I like those ranks but what would I be?
Posted: 03 Dec 2002 19:22
by Paranoid Android
Spiff's spritual post count may actually be really low, depending on how many of his posts are total spam.
Think of it like this - If someone has posted 20 times and 19 of them have been useful contributions, it's better than someone posting 2000-odd posts if only 19 have been useful contributions.
Post counts don't show anything. I say this after being a moderator at EEA and having vinnie ram that down my throat constantly. I mean 'I got 2000 posts! w00t!' Well, look how much I don't care.
Disclaimer: Tombe and his associates are not involved in 'flaming' in any way. Consider it 'Constructive criticism'

Posted: 03 Dec 2002 21:09
by spaceman-spiff
Tombe wrote:Spiff's spritual post count may actually be really low, depending on how many of his posts are total spam.
So all my posts are spam and don't contribute to nothing, thanks A LOT
Edit: by me, just removed some text, i don't want to get into any further, if everybody thinks i'm a spammer, then i will only post when necessary
Posted: 03 Dec 2002 22:05
by orudge
Hmmm, maybe we should just stick with the current system

Let's not have any fighting please.