Transport Tycoon Forums

Mackensen wrote:I've updated to the latest version and I'm getting an error at the end of the compile, when it goes to link the binary:

Code: Select all

[SRC] Linking openttd
linkgraph/mcf.o: In function `MultiCommodityFlow::CleanupPaths(unsigned int, std::vector<Path*, std::allocator<Path*> >&)':
mcf.cpp:(.text+0x659): undefined reference to `Path::UnFork()'
mcf.cpp:(.text+0x6a5): undefined reference to `Path::UnFork()'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[1]: *** [openttd] Error 1

System is Ubuntu with a 2.6.32-24-generic kernel.

fonso wrote:

Mackensen wrote:I've updated to the latest version and I'm getting an error at the end of the compile, when it goes to link the binary:

Code: Select all

[SRC] Linking openttd
linkgraph/mcf.o: In function `MultiCommodityFlow::CleanupPaths(unsigned int, std::vector<Path*, std::allocator<Path*> >&)':
mcf.cpp:(.text+0x659): undefined reference to `Path::UnFork()'
mcf.cpp:(.text+0x6a5): undefined reference to `Path::UnFork()'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[1]: *** [openttd] Error 1

System is Ubuntu with a 2.6.32-24-generic kernel.

Strange, it works here, with g++ 4.4.5. Did you do a "make clean" before compiling? If not, please try that. And can you give me the output of "g++ --version"?^

g++ (Ubuntu 4.4.3-4ubuntu5) 4.4.3

Mackensen wrote:Yes I did, and I just did it again to make sure. Here's what I get from g++:

Code: Select all

g++ (Ubuntu 4.4.3-4ubuntu5) 4.4.3

fonso wrote:

Mackensen wrote:Yes I did, and I just did it again to make sure. Here's what I get from g++:

Code: Select all

g++ (Ubuntu 4.4.3-4ubuntu5) 4.4.3

Can you try with this patch? It removes the inlining of Path::UnFork(). Maybe I can't use inlined functions in a different file after all ...

edit: I've probably fixed it. g++ 4.4.5 does some strange magic here ...

WWW wrote:For all you compile virgins: 32 bit build. Compiled on windows 7 with minGW.

Cargodist g52c89b9bM

Horse wrote:Why can't the devs do some concessions for a major feature as Cargo distribution.

In 2004 there were still patches for passengers destinations.
We are six year later now and we havan't still anything.
There were several patches build from scratch.
All of them had some major problems and the projects died.

For now Fonso has made a great solotion too build a cargo distribution system.
I played several games with it and in my opinion this is the most balanced system i ever seen.
Even i heard nobody complain about lags.
And now the devs won't accept it for some small issues that is not perfect in their opinion.

WWW wrote:I think the best concession they could make would be to accept it as an official branch and give it a space on the compile roster, but I don't see that happening either.

id10terror wrote:At the risk of everyones wrath....... ..... i'm not sure if Fonso has yet requested trunk inclusion or daily compile, i'm sure he will when he deems appropriate, until then i'm not saying anything for or against any potential outcome. (mind you i cannot see myself saying anything against)

fonso wrote: 3.2 getting approval from the openttdcoop people to use their server

Arie- wrote:Hey! I would like to participate in the next CD game. However I'm sparse on time as well, so maybe it's useful to plan a game ahead, like two weeks, so everyone can make sure they're available at least some period during that day.