Transport Tycoon Forums

Update for Shadow: hovering in search field will open up a popup containing picture of the graphic.

The hovering thing doesn't work, is there some internet switch I need ?

When I point at any graphic I get this message at the bottom

spaceman-spiff wrote:The hovering thing doesn't work, is there some internet switch I need ?

When I point at any graphic I get this message at the bottom

No I forgot to upload the javascript, sorry bout that. it works now.

Sorry, but still nothing

spaceman-spiff wrote:Sorry, but still nothing

Yes, I see, yesterday it worked out okay, but now it is broken.Dunnow what's cousing it, IE gives a somewhat vague error: "Kan RPC niet uitvoeren".

I think I liked the old site better.......

mp3Pro wrote:I think I liked the old site better.......

On one side I say yes but on the other side this site is much better, this site is easyer to maintain and so. And I have build in that almost everything can be added/modified without harming the old stuff. Which was not the fact with the old site were everything was that one thing is added/changed the other thing must be upgraded too.

You have so many spelling errors in the Graphics section that I post here a corrected version of the first 2 paragraphs corrected.


Welcome to the Graphics section, here you can find a lot of graphics. Most of them are posted at the Transport Tycoon forums. Because the forums are a bit hard to read and download all the files, I made a website for anybody that wants to see new Graphics in a fast and sorted way. You can check the paragraph below the sorting stuff for instalation instructions.

In the new-site I made various ways to sort out the Graphics easily for you. Currently you can sort in these three ways, select one/more of them and hit search: (you can also fill in nothing and you'll get the complete list).

Update:

I could not find any of my graphics in there. Fell free to upload them. (translation: upload my graphics now!!)

Andrex, pointing somebody to his spelling errors isn't nice
I seem to remember you didn't like it either !

Andrex wrote:You have so many spelling errors in the Graphics section that I post here a corrected version of the first 2 paragraphs corrected.

May be you could to spellcheck my site too?

Andrex wrote:Welcome to the Graphics section, here you can find a lot of graphics.

This might be better as "Welcome to the Graphics section. Here you can find a lot of graphics for Transport Tycoon."

can check the paragraph below the sorting stuff for instalation instructions.

"instalation" should be "installation".

I could not find any of my graphics in there. Fell free to upload them. (translation: upload my graphics now!!)

"fell" should be "feel".

spaceman-spiff wrote:Andrex, pointing somebody to his spelling errors isn't nice
I seem to remember you didn't like it either !

What's wrong with saying spelling errors to somebody, my English is terrible, if it were dutch I would be ashamed that so many people are reporting spell errors.

Andrex wrote: could not find any of my graphics in there. Fell free to upload them. (translation: upload my graphics now!!)

Need to upload the other graphics first too. takes a load of time finding/downloading/renaming/uploading them all.

There are too much posts after this post so I'm moving it too the last post off this topic.

mp3Pro wrote:I think I liked the old site better.......

Sorry Dinges, but I have to agree to him.

Marcel wrote:

mp3Pro wrote:I think I liked the old site better.......

Sorry Dinges, but I have to agree to him.

What do you like better in the old site? The lay-out?

everything...

first of all the layout, then there where on the left the categories, very usefull. On your first site I have seen there where pictures direct by the files, now you have to load each picture for its own. I don´t think it is a good idea to sort the files by date, to sort them by version is a very good idea. The number how often some file is downloaded is in my eyes not so good, the first posted file is of course usually the most downloaded. And at last I have to say that I liked the colours more, but this must not be a point on which you should think about, others will like the actual colours more. After all it is still a good site.

Marcel wrote:first of all the layout, then there where on the left the categories, very usefull. On your first site I have seen there where pictures direct by the files, now you have to load each picture for its own. I don´t think it is a good idea to sort the files by date, to sort them by version is a very good idea. The number how often some file is downloaded is in my eyes not so good, the first posted file is of course usually the most downloaded. And at last I have to say that I liked the colours more, but this must not be a point on which you should think about, others will like the actual colours more. After all it is still a good site.

1. I was already thinking about disposing the "date" completely. (No longer the date function would speed up inserting off graphics becouse I don't have to check when they were posted)
2. What's wrong about seeing how many times a file is downloaded? For me it is some sort of statistic. Second, you don't have to use that feature, I left it optional.
3. Maybe a user-defined style (i.e let them choose which style they like)

Yes it is a statistic, but it does not reflect the truth. It would be so when you divide the downloads through the days available, so you get a figure which you can compare with another one.

Marcel wrote:Yes it is a statistic, but it does not reflect the truth. It would be so when you divide the downloads through the days available, so you get a figure which you can compare with another one.

That would be impossible if I delete the date. So the downloads will be the same as they are right now, to make it fair there will be a rating system. That should work out okay.