Transport Tycoon Forums

Posted: **04 Mar 2018 10:36**

Small patch to keep track of the ordering of the docks in the harbour. See foto.

Posted: **04 Mar 2018 14:26**

HackaLittleBit wrote:Small patch to keep track of the ordering of the docks in the harbour.

First I successfully applied your Organise_ship_docking patch.
Then I applied your dock numbers_26124.patch and got this:

MinGW wrote:sh: dock: No such file or directory

and then I figured it out ... MinGW read the space in your patch name as a new line or some such.
Bad bad MinGW does not like spaces in it's lunch.
Adding an underscore worked: dock_numbers_26124.patch
MinGW is happy now.

Make is acookin' and lunch will be up within 30 minutes or so.

A Win32 binary lunch is ready:

DockNumberTest_Win32.7z: The recipe ...; (5.74 MiB) Downloaded 257 times

and a sampling from our kitchen:

: Lunch by the numbers ...; Dock Number Test.png (66.35 KiB) Viewed 6124 times

Posted: **04 Mar 2018 18:09**

Here is the binary with JGR's tracerestrict-cidan, Hackalitlebit's docks by the numbers and notafrog's favourite free bridge:

OpenTTD-NMF_JGR-g5f20fe4eM-tracerestrict-cirdan-HAv2plus1-Win32.7z: Code by numbers; (5.76 MiB) Downloaded 244 times

and some "what-you-see-is-what-you-get":

: Paint by numbers; Docking_By_The_Numbers.png (170.6 KiB) Viewed 6116 times

Enjoy,

Posted: **06 Mar 2018 15:34**

Waiting bouy ready!

Wally it is better to apply the 4 patches again.(zipfile below)
I hope you don't have problems with savegames.(I didn't)
Docks (yes the ones with 2 tiles) can only be used for loading and unloading.
Dockbuoy's can be transformed into a waiting buoy or for loading unloading.
You need to click on the label and press ctrl.
By doing so you will roll trough all possible states.

Code: Select all

color codes :
green-green   : Ready to receive for loading unloading.
red-green     : Reserved for loading unloading.
green-yellow  : Ready to receive for waiting.
red-yellow    : Reserved for waiting.

See below foto.

: wb.png (18.7 KiB) Viewed 6044 times

Patches included in zipfile.
Note that instead of using bool var (reserved) now a flag (dockstatus) is used!!

: docks.png (25.92 KiB) Viewed 6044 times

Posted: **06 Mar 2018 17:36**

HackaLittleBit wrote:Waiting bouy ready!

Can you make the coloured dots larger? On my system they are quite difficult to discern even at maximum zoom

Patches included in zipfile.

I applied them in the following order:
26350 then 26351 then 26352 then 26353
Is this ok? Your png image suggests a reverse order.

Here is the Windows 32 bit binary:

OpenTTD-NMF-g30353e06M-HALB-4_Win32.7z: Just the 4 patches, nothing else.; (5.74 MiB) Downloaded 252 times

NOTE: My MinGW had a hiccup on the first chunk of the first patch (26350), however it seems that MinGW retried and it was ok. The subsequent 3 patches went without issue. So, please run this binary to make sure that nothing broke.

Posted: **06 Mar 2018 19:03**

wallyweb wrote:Can you make the coloured dots larger? On my system they are quite difficult to discern even at maximum zoom

When you open /Cirdan-clone/src/lang/english.txt you can find the following lines

Code: Select all

STR_VIEWPORT_DOCK_GREEN                                         :{GREEN}..{BLACK}{NUM}
STR_VIEWPORT_DOCK_RED                                           :{RED}..{BLACK}{NUM}
STR_VIEWPORT_DOCK_GREEN_YELLOW                                  :{GREEN}.{YELLOW}.{BLACK}{NUM}
STR_VIEWPORT_DOCK_RED_YELLOW                                    :{RED}.{YELLOW}.{BLACK}{NUM}

Just change the dots to another character.
Like * or º or :
I now used

Code: Select all

STR_VIEWPORT_DOCK_GREEN                                         :{GREEN}::{BLACK}{NUM}
STR_VIEWPORT_DOCK_RED                                           :{RED}::{BLACK}{NUM}
STR_VIEWPORT_DOCK_GREEN_YELLOW                                  :{GREEN}:{YELLOW}:{BLACK}{NUM}
STR_VIEWPORT_DOCK_RED_YELLOW                                    :{RED}:{YELLOW}:{BLACK}{NUM}

That looks like this

: dubblepoint.png (62.08 KiB) Viewed 6005 times

It is for testing only.
Also change your company collor for more contrast.

wallyweb wrote:I applied them in the following order:
26350 then 26351 then 26352 then 26353

Correct. Uh... I didn't think about it, but that is how I see it on my screen.

wallyweb wrote:NOTE: My MinGW had a hiccup

Hmmm I'll check it out here.
Hold on.

Posted: **06 Mar 2018 19:28**

wallyweb wrote: NOTE: My MinGW had a hiccup

Its time to start branching.
Clean patch below

apply in reversed order.

: 2.png (26.4 KiB) Viewed 5996 times

Tested 2x and compiled 2x

Posted: **06 Mar 2018 19:32**

HackaLittleBit wrote:
wallyweb wrote:Can you make the coloured dots larger? On my system they are quite difficult to discern even at maximum zoom
Just change the dots to another character.

Aha! I will experiment with an assortment of characters.

Also change your company collor for more contrast.

This is a little more difficult. Players select a company colour for a reason. My own preference is orange because it shows up well for me. Another player may prefer red or white for a similar reason, or for any reason they deem to be valid.

wallyweb wrote:NOTE: My MinGW had a hiccup
Hmmm I'll check it out here.
Hold on.

/me pauses productivity.

Clean patch below

Back with a fresh binary in about an hour,

Posted: **06 Mar 2018 19:56**

MinGW says ...

Code: Select all

$ patch -p1 < Cirdan-clone_26346.patch
patching file src/pathfinder/opf/opf_ship.cpp
patching file src/pathfinder/yapf/yapf_ship.cpp
Hunk #1 FAILED at 48.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 104 (offset -3 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 230 (offset -3 lines).
1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file src/pathfinder/yapf/yapf_ship.
cpp.rej
patching file src/saveload/afterload.cpp
patching file src/saveload/saveload.cpp
patching file src/saveload/station_sl.cpp
patching file src/ship_cmd.cpp
patching file src/station_base.h
Hunk #3 succeeded at 537 (offset 27 lines).
patching file src/vehicle.cpp

Here are the yapf_ship files:

yapf.7z: (4.96 KiB) Downloaded 308 times

/me pauses productivity

Posted: **06 Mar 2018 20:06**

Did you update your branche from cirdan?
His last commit is:
Fix old map array tunnel head conversion 7 days ago.
here

I checked your reject.
But that should be easy
open file yapf_ship.cpp
and replace lines (somewere near line 50)

Code: Select all

-		, m_dest_tile    (depot ? INVALID_TILE :
-				ship->current_order.IsType (OT_GOTO_STATION) ?
-					m_dest_station->GetClosestTile (ship->tile, m_dest_station->dock_area) :
-				ship->dest_tile)

with

Code: Select all

		, m_dest_tile    (depot ? INVALID_TILE : ship->dest_tile)

And I made clean clone of cirdan and the patch applies without problems

Posted: **06 Mar 2018 21:21**

HackaLittleBit wrote:Did you update your branche from cirdan?
His last commit is:
Fix old map array tunnel head conversion 7 days ago.

I tried but I couldn't get Git clone to point to his testing branch.

I checked your reject.
But that should be easy

I'll apply your fix and see what happens.

Now, how do I get Git to clone from his testing branch?

Hmm ... So now we will have

Code: Select all

-		, m_dest_tile    (depot ? INVALID_TILE : ship->dest_tile)
+		, m_dest_tile    (depot ? INVALID_TILE : ship->dest_tile)

Posted: **06 Mar 2018 21:30**

wallyweb wrote:Now, how do I get Git to clone from his testing branch?

I pull from here
git://repo.or.cz/openttd/fttd.git

Posted: **06 Mar 2018 21:49**

HackaLittleBit wrote:I pull from here
git://repo.or.cz/openttd/fttd.git

So did I and that got me the regular repo. Now I just got brilliance and determined that the branch name is testing and I put that into Git clone's branch field and that worked.

I'm compiling a clean test branch now, and when that is done I will compile another with your patches. Look for results in about an hour or two.

Posted: **06 Mar 2018 21:59**

You know, for a long time I refused to buy a new computer.
I used many years ago system 36 and system 1 IBM
We had 60 terminals on 750 kb of memory.
Yeahhhhh.
So I was happy with my eee pc + 2 MB of memory. (massive machine) windows xp
My son grew up and started to laugh at me.
Anyway after much arguing he managed to take me to the shop.
He showed me a machine with 4000k screen Nvidia board etc etc. quadcore etc etc etc.
I tell you, he was right
The difference is incredible.
I compile openttd in less than a minute. Instead of 15.
4000k screen is like reading a book.
Don't be a grumpy old man, spend the money!

Regards

Posted: **06 Mar 2018 23:10**

cirdan wrote:I have just resurrected my testing branch with an update that fixes a crash when loading games with the old map array (reported by HackaLittleBit). If everything goes well and no other bugs appear, I will merge this branch to my master branch in a few days.

Having finally figured out how to pull from cirdan's testing branch, here is the bare and naked, unmodified Windows 32bit binary:

NMF-g1938333b-testing-Win32.7z: Once tested and verified to be without a crash, this will be replaced by a formal push from cirdan; (5.72 MiB) Downloaded 258 times

Moving on to HackalitleBit's patches, MinGW now gives me:

Code: Select all

$ patch -p1 < Cirdan-clone_26346.patch
patching file src/pathfinder/opf/opf_ship.cpp
patching file src/pathfinder/yapf/yapf_ship.cpp
patch: **** malformed patch at line 40: @@ -107,7 +104,7 @@

Are you sure about that yapf_ship.cpp mod you suggested?

HackaLittleBit wrote:Don't be a grumpy old man, spend the money!

About five years ago I spent close to $2000 on a brand new HP lappy, the big one with a big screen, triple core performance and Windows 7. Yeahhhhh.
Sometime last year, when it was well out of warranty, it smoked its on-board graphic chip. Result: One motherboard reduced to scrap!
So I resurrected my reliable old Dell single core XP box and muddled along until I had the $150 I needed for a used A-Open dual core XP box which is where I am and remain until I can raise $500 for something with more cores and with absolutely NO Windows 10.
It could be worse. I could always go back to my still running IBM P/S 1 with Windows 3.1

Posted: **07 Mar 2018 00:13**

Wally see below patch

I manually edited it.
Don't apply the patch just look at the differences.
Change manually this line (51)

Code: Select all

		, m_dest_tile    (depot ? INVALID_TILE : ship->current_order.IsType(OT_GOTO_STATION) ? m_dest_station->GetClosestTile(ship->tile, STATION_DOCK) : ship->dest_tile)

Into

Code: Select all

		, m_dest_tile    (depot ? INVALID_TILE : ship->dest_tile)

I applied my patches and indeed it is the only problem I encountered.

I all depends on which branch is active.

Posted: **07 Mar 2018 01:51**

I only have a plain text editor (NoteTab Light) so I do not see the line numbers.

HackaLittleBit wrote:Wally see below patch

I manually edited it.
Don't apply the patch just look at the differences.
Change manually this line (51)
Code: Select all
		, m_dest_tile    (depot ? INVALID_TILE : ship->current_order.IsType(OT_GOTO_STATION) ? m_dest_station->GetClosestTile(ship->tile, STATION_DOCK) : ship->dest_tile)

This is the closest line that I have and it is different from the one that you have:

Code: Select all

-		, m_dest_tile    (depot ? INVALID_TILE :
-				ship->current_order.IsType (OT_GOTO_STATION) ?
-					m_dest_station->GetClosestTile (ship->tile, m_dest_station->dock_area) :
-				ship->dest_tile)

It is followed by this line:

Code: Select all

+		, m_dest_tile    (depot ? INVALID_TILE : ship->dest_tile)

so if I make your suggested change, I will have:

Code: Select all

-		, m_dest_tile    (depot ? INVALID_TILE : ship->dest_tile)
+		, m_dest_tile    (depot ? INVALID_TILE : ship->dest_tile)

Wouldn't it be easier to just send me your revised patch rather than I make the changes by hand?

Posted: **07 Mar 2018 08:37**

wallyweb wrote:Wouldn't it be easier to just send me your revised patch rather than I make the changes by hand?

Anyway
Here is a pic of the harbour of Singapore.

This is the reality there.

: singapore.png (309.15 KiB) Viewed 5867 times

And below the 4 patches that you need.

They go above the commit from cirdan of 5 months ago.
Changeset: 25986 (65a280a61037) Make BreakIndustryChainLink an ordinary function …

wallyweb wrote:I only have a plain text editor (NoteTab Light) so I do not see the line numbers

I am on linux now and never going back.
On windows one of the best tools for editing is NOTEPAD++
With this you can read c++ and patches and lots more.
EDIT
I see now that Kdevelop has a version for windows!!!
Here you can download it.
I know that more devellopers here use this IDE
I really like it, highly recomended.

I do not know how to set up things for windows.
Here are the instructions

Posted: **07 Mar 2018 11:34**

HackaLittleBit wrote:This is the reality there.

So when are you going to make a scenario of the real thing?

And below the 4 patches that you need.

They go above the commit from cirdan of 5 months ago.

Ok ... We're done with cirdan's test push then ...

I am on linux now and never going back.

I was on Linux, many distros, many times ... Red Hat, Mandrake, and whatever the latest one is ... I forget the name ... I may go back when I get a better PC, but for now I'm not messing with partitions etc.

On windows one of the best tools for editing is NOTEPAD++
With this you can read c++ and patches and lots more.

Actually I can do all that with NoteTab Light. I'm just too busy lazy to poke around the app.

I see now that Kdevelop has a version for windows!!!
Here you can download it.
I know that more devellopers here use this IDE
I really like it, highly recomended.

I'll look into it, but it would probably just sit there taking up space.

Posted: **07 Mar 2018 15:01**

OK ... Here we go ...

Windows 32bit cirdan's push with HackalittleBit's mod:

OpenTTD-NMF-g30353e06M-HALB-4a_Win32.7z: Exactly the way HackalittleBit wrote it; (5.74 MiB) Downloaded 263 times

Windows 32bit JGR's tracerestrict-cirdan with HackalittleBit's mod and cirdan's free-bridge diff and a little mod of my own:

OpenTTD-NMF_JGR-g5f20fe4eM-tracerestrict-cirdan-FBHAv4a-Win32.7z: With my own mod added; (5.76 MiB) Downloaded 289 times

A little screenshot showing my mod:

: A thousand words worth of picture; dockTest.png (94.37 KiB) Viewed 5818 times

An observation: If a second ship joins the waiting ship, the waiting buoy's symbols change to reservation available.

All in all, this is really neat.

Transport Tycoon Forums

New map features

Re: New map features

Re: New map features

Re: New map features

Re: New map features

Re: New map features

Re: New map features

Re: New map features

Re: New map features

Re: New map features

Re: New map features

Re: New map features

Re: New map features

Re: New map features

Re: New map features

Re: New map features

Re: New map features

Re: New map features

Re: New map features

Re: New map features

Re: New map features