Transport Tycoon Forums

My HQ is the light blue one(the smallest)
Though, my HQ was bigger towards end of that game, i got it to the final stage..

Akalamanaia wrote:My HQ is the light blue one(the smallest)
Though, my HQ was bigger towards end of that game, i got it to the final stage..

Yeah, I remember that one. I placed the 4 buoys around my HQ, and had 2 hovercraft circling as patrol boats. However, in the end, they were the only vehicles keeping me from 1000 Tycoon rating, so they had to go

I have the save somewhere.

realy, you have? please, post it. i want to take a look at the end-state of that game. nearly at the end i wasn't able to log in to your server. when connected the connection broke.

I remember that game. Its one of my favourites and I was the ugly blue colour with the small HQ . Please post the savegame Brianetta.

I don't suppose you guys remember the nightly release?

If I remind corectly, something very near to r3330

EDIT: I think it has to be 3330, because the server was open unnaturally long because there were no new nightlies for 2 days...

Ingenious!

CharlyHRO wrote:If I remind corectly, something very near to r3330

EDIT: I think it has to be 3330, because the server was open unnaturally long because there were no new nightlies for 2 days...

Sounds about right. r3329 rings a bell with me, but I have a savegame at home from this one... it was a corker, and by 2090, I had some trains making 175M profit *per trip*.

boahhhhh, boaring

Here is that Brianetta game.

Cool.

I have all the nightly saves, but they're stored by release number only...

Haha. look at my puny system! Now it has become etticate (did i spell it right?) to put yor HQ out of the way.

its "ettiquette" (i think)

Anyway - 175 million per trip? Cool. But just try a few thousand years of inflation. Don't like to boast, but my Ebay game is back that way a bit! <--- .

However, that's as may be. My humble little route here makes nowhere near this. It's there to demonstrate the multiple split when going uphill. The route into the [overfunded] wood station is half this, half a take on the station entrance in one of the Coop games. Very fast intake actually The trains make about 1 million per trip- they go the length of a 1024 square map.

proudmoore wrote:its "ettiquette" (i think)

Try with only three ts: etiquette.

Speel-chuckers exist for a reason. Use them. Especially when you're trying to tell someone else how to spell a word.

Or try to use http://www.dictionary.com

I had a 128x128 map and put some coal mines in it and 3 power stations, I connected all 12 (IIRC) coal mines to one power station. There was a total of 140~150 trains going through one 12 platform station(extended it later to 16 as it is in the screen) and it could handle it with ease. Nowadays I have 91 maglev trains going through the station and it sometimes jams because the main line behind it gets blown up by ufo's

DaleStan wrote:

proudmoore wrote:its "ettiquette" (i think)

Try with only three ts: etiquette.

Speel-chuckers exist for a reason. Use them. Especially when you're trying to tell someone else how to spell a word.

And yet you spell it 'speel-chuckers'....right....

jpmaster wrote:

DaleStan wrote:Speel-chuckers exist for a reason. Use them. Especially when you're trying to tell someone else how to spell a word.

And yet you spell it 'speel-chuckers'....right....

Bit of a sense of humour failure there, jpmaster. It wasn't worng, it was funny.

I've found that spelling flames are always a failure. That's because Murphy's law (also) states: "Any spelling flame will always contain at least one spelling error".

Hence the reason you place an intentional spelling error in spelling flames. This way you can satisfy Murphy's law and not have any tyops.