Transport Tycoon Forums

Is there any specific order in which these files need to be loaded?

If you're just gonna add the packs that are listed on 1st post in this thread: no. (OpenGFX Infrastructure - v0.4 etc)

Sweet, just loaded them and it looks divine...

will load them into my current game and enjoy...

thanks much to all involved

This is a kickass patch .

When we get a new version ?`0.5?

Anderwin wrote:When we get a new version ?`0.5?

When it's done

s

or maybe a bit later

Its all volunteer work, so browse trough the link in my sig saying 'OpenGFX' and do your bits please

Anderwin wrote:This is a kickass patch .

When we get a new version ?`0.5?

As soon as somebody comes up with coded new graphics which are made into a pack...

I thought, you like to make a OpenGFX+ Pack for GRFs which does more then "just" replace sprites. OpenGFX Landscape is the only GRF, which can't be loaded as static in OTTD, because of the rivers (iirc). Wouldn't it make sense, to take them out and create a "OpenGFX Landscape+" GRF?

Edit: Oh, and something else, could you please get rid of release number in filename? Would make live much easier for updating to new Versions...

Edit2: I forgot to say most important thing: really amazing project.

Greets
Ammler

Ammler wrote: Edit: Oh, and something else, could you please get rid of release number in filename? Would make live much easier for updating to new Versions...

You can rename files yourself. A bit more work on your side, but a lot more order on gfx developers' side.

Sorry, that wasn't mean't like an order. (I am not native english speaker, so you might missunderstood me.)

Maybe you are right, we need to think about renaming in general. OpenGFX is not the only project, which has release numbers in the filename. But so far we took all files/archives unaltered to the pack.

Greets
Ammler

Sorry if this is little spammy, but all I want to say.

Good job guys! I thought this wouldn't get anywhere (seeing how the 32-bit equivalent went), but I see that you all have proved me wrong.

Thanks is always welcome! Sadly I think the project is going to stay slow for the next few months (exam term, finals in my case) but in the summer you can look forward to lots more from me!

Summer will turn our thread hot again!

Ammler wrote:Sorry, that wasn't mean't like an order. (I am not native english speaker, so you might missunderstood me.)

And my message wasn't mean like a rebuke of any kind. Just a piece of advice and explanation, why version numbering is important. The word 'order' in my post was synonymic to 'neatiness' not to 'command'

Houses 1... Ready for coding...

Shame on you, Zephyris. Those houses are far too nice for OpenTTD!

I apologise, I shall try and make my work worse in the future

When was the last time you saw a multi-level building being constructed without the use of scaffolding?! IMO the under-construction versions look far more like ruined or bombed-out buildings than construction sites!
Where are the hard-hats? The fluorescent jackets? The whistles and inappropriate remarks at passers-by? (Woo-woo! Show us yer boiler luv!)

The UFO took it?

Looking good Zeph! Now where have all the coders gone? I havent tried my hand at coding buildings yet, not sure how hard it is, but probably to hard for me yet anyway...

They look good! Just some of my immediate thoughts...

- I agree that the construction steps look a bit 'non-constructive', but as they are shown only for a short while, who cares?

- You obviously haven't seen a Swedish construction site in winter - or the game doesn't discriminate for climate when showing construction sprites

- Shouldn't the snowy sprites have some off-white at ground level too? I don't know if there is any 'depth' in snowy landscape tiles, but normally part of the basement would be covered with some snow.

- Did I say they look good?