Forum for technical discussions regarding development. If you have a general suggestion, problem or comment, please use one of the other forums.
Moderator: OpenTTD Developers
pasteur
Engineer
Posts: 9 Joined: 14 Mar 2009 17:55
Post
by pasteur » 15 Mar 2009 14:09
SOLVED!!!!
Here is the result which I was looking for!!
openttd+cargodest+pngsupport+freetype _r15710 (MinGW)
CONFIRMED : There is no AI Problem in my build. Download an AI via online contents download.
Attachments
openttd.7z
openttd+cargodest+pngsupport+freetype _r15710_win32 (3.42 MiB) Downloaded 215 times
Last edited by
pasteur on 16 Mar 2009 09:46, edited 3 times in total.
pshemko
Engineer
Posts: 104 Joined: 24 Sep 2004 02:43
Location: Aotearoa (New Zealand)
Post
by pshemko » 15 Mar 2009 19:20
What did you do to get the freetype support compiled in? Can you post you're 'configure' arguments?
Rubidium
OpenTTD Developer
Posts: 3815 Joined: 09 Feb 2006 19:15
Post
by Rubidium » 15 Mar 2009 19:24
When you've properly installed the freetype development stuff in MinGW the configure script automatically detects it.
pasteur
Engineer
Posts: 9 Joined: 14 Mar 2009 17:55
Post
by pasteur » 16 Mar 2009 07:41
Rubidium wrote: When you've properly installed the freetype development stuff in MinGW the configure script automatically detects it.
Thank you for your advice.
Timitry
Transport Coordinator
Posts: 313 Joined: 01 Oct 2004 15:28
Contact:
Post
by Timitry » 19 Mar 2009 11:22
19.03.2009, 12:19
Celestar:
"dihedral: working on a sync with trunk"
Absolutely awesome!
Hope dies last
Eddi
Tycoon
Posts: 8289 Joined: 17 Jan 2007 00:14
Post
by Eddi » 19 Mar 2009 11:27
he's telling that for weeks already
blitzkrieg
Engineer
Posts: 105 Joined: 30 Jun 2006 04:22
Post
by blitzkrieg » 19 Mar 2009 11:57
Eddi wrote: he's telling that for weeks already
Is that the reason for cargodest being shifted to v.80 roadmap??
Auge
Chief Executive
Posts: 660 Joined: 23 Oct 2006 02:07
Location: Berlin
Post
by Auge » 19 Mar 2009 12:19
blitzkrieg wrote: Eddi wrote: he's telling that for weeks already
Is that the reason for cargodest being shifted to v.80 roadmap??
No, it wasn't/isn't ready for 0.7.
Tschö, Auge
Eddi
Tycoon
Posts: 8289 Joined: 17 Jan 2007 00:14
Post
by Eddi » 19 Mar 2009 13:31
blitzkrieg wrote: Eddi wrote: he's telling that for weeks already
Is that the reason for cargodest being shifted to v.80 roadmap??
no, the reason for someone modifying the road map is someone else mentioning that the road map is outdated.
2007Alain2007
Chief Executive
Posts: 658 Joined: 11 Nov 2007 12:06
Contact:
Post
by 2007Alain2007 » 20 Mar 2009 00:12
updated cargodest and works fine on R15774 here is a win32 build
cargodest R15774 win32 build.7z
Aali
Traffic Manager
Posts: 144 Joined: 01 Oct 2008 00:04
Location: Sweden
Post
by Aali » 20 Mar 2009 00:26
Why does that archive include the .svn directory?
Why did you set the version string to "cargodest"?
2007Alain2007
Chief Executive
Posts: 658 Joined: 11 Nov 2007 12:06
Contact:
Post
by 2007Alain2007 » 20 Mar 2009 00:33
so i know what one i was playing i am sorry
and the .svn directory? i did not take my time in doing the zip file
nex259
Engineer
Posts: 11 Joined: 13 Mar 2009 13:52
Post
by nex259 » 21 Mar 2009 16:10
Is the type definission of variable "rn.stopover_penalty" missing?
According to documents,this variable's value is able to set 1-1000 ,but defined type is SLE_UINT8,because the value is able to set 1-255(if set>256,the value is incollect "0-255" circulation).
---
Sorry my bad English...
nex259
---
Leanden
Tycoon
Posts: 2613 Joined: 19 Mar 2009 19:25
Location: Kent
Post
by Leanden » 23 Mar 2009 22:34
Alain, could you patch me the same file that you've made there but a Mac OSX version in a a .7z file?
Please and thankyou
Leanden
Tycoon
Posts: 2613 Joined: 19 Mar 2009 19:25
Location: Kent
Post
by Leanden » 23 Mar 2009 22:35
Oh also, this has caused a problem with some of my vehicles, making a loss because they are carrying goods back towards their original source... Has this been changed in the recent versions so that it is based on distance travelled, rather than final distance???
Conditional Zenith
Chief Executive
Posts: 697 Joined: 10 Jun 2003 00:19
Location: Australia
Post
by Conditional Zenith » 23 Mar 2009 23:28
No, that behaviour is still as it is from trunk. The problem with doing it based on how far things have traveled over the ground, instead of source to destination point to point, is that it encourages people to make indirect routes, as they would pay better than direct routes.
Leanden
Tycoon
Posts: 2613 Joined: 19 Mar 2009 19:25
Location: Kent
Post
by Leanden » 23 Mar 2009 23:39
But obviously time is still a constraint... What if income was generated based on distance travelled between stations. So income is generated at each stage of movement.
Conditional Zenith
Chief Executive
Posts: 697 Joined: 10 Jun 2003 00:19
Location: Australia
Post
by Conditional Zenith » 24 Mar 2009 01:58
That still provides an incentive to make indirect routes. And it provides no incentive to actually get cargo all the way to its destination.
2007Alain2007
Chief Executive
Posts: 658 Joined: 11 Nov 2007 12:06
Contact:
Post
by 2007Alain2007 » 24 Mar 2009 02:05
can some one please update this patchs and i am off to bed
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests