roest's patch pack v9 (r13019)
Moderator: OpenTTD Developers
Re: yet another...err...my patch pack (r12892)
First at all I have to say: Nice work!
I've got a problem with the new seperation patch. All works fine for the first "ingema-days", but then it seems as if the trains are ignoring the seperation. This problem can't be solved by clicking the "Automatic Seperation"-button. All I want is an automaticly sepereration of my trains, even if I add one or more trains to the timetable.
I've got a problem with the new seperation patch. All works fine for the first "ingema-days", but then it seems as if the trains are ignoring the seperation. This problem can't be solved by clicking the "Automatic Seperation"-button. All I want is an automaticly sepereration of my trains, even if I add one or more trains to the timetable.
Re: yet another...err...my patch pack (r12892)
Just a thought, wouldn't that be something the author of that patch is able to answer or maybe interested in? For that purpose I added links to the original threads in the first post.
Re: yet another...err...my patch pack (r12892)
I've wrote the question in that thread, too.
As I read the posts in this thread I thin k that there are a lot of people who have been happier with the "old" seperation patch.
As I read the posts in this thread I thin k that there are a lot of people who have been happier with the "old" seperation patch.
Re: yet another...err...my patch pack (r12892)
The TTD-style orders don't work in your (excellent!) r12892m-patch; do you happen to know whether that's a general OTTD problem? I now get 'go non-stop to...' automatically for all orders, and 'go to' always stops anywhere in between, no matter whether I enable or disable that patch option.
Re: yet another...err...my patch pack (r12892)
That's the intended behavior of the orders now, with patch or without. To make it official here the dev statement:MJS wrote:The TTD-style orders don't work in your (excellent!) r12892m-patch; do you happen to know whether that's a general OTTD problem? I now get 'go non-stop to...' automatically for all orders, and 'go to' always stops anywhere in between, no matter whether I enable or disable that patch option.
[17:49] <Rubidium> Roest: the patch setting is only there as default for new orders
Re: yet another...err...my patch pack (r12892)
Bug found (I think) unless it's a desired effect... self compiled version using trunk 12892 for win9x
It seems that when using the non-pax patchlist, the AI cannot build stations (rail definitely, road/airports probably).
Is this intended behaviour?
(otherwise, great collection of patches, really like the pax version!)
It seems that when using the non-pax patchlist, the AI cannot build stations (rail definitely, road/airports probably).
Is this intended behaviour?
(otherwise, great collection of patches, really like the pax version!)
Re: yet another...err...my patch pack (r12892)
Thanks for adding paxdest - I love all these patches. I hope paxdest will someday work with multiplayers.
Sorry for overreading the copypaste.grf thingy, well, I thought you included all required files.
Sorry for overreading the copypaste.grf thingy, well, I thought you included all required files.
Re: yet another...err...my patch pack (r12892)
Heh, crashes for me.
I start a new game, enable pax destinations in patches (only the first setting, since almost all other settings are marked as experimental), create a simple town-to-town road vehicle route and after the route is established game sometimes crashes (didn't notice exactly when), and then you can only load autosave which was created before the route was established - attempts to load any newer autosave result in crash. Reproducible.
By the way, is there anywhere a description of all those pax dest options?
I start a new game, enable pax destinations in patches (only the first setting, since almost all other settings are marked as experimental), create a simple town-to-town road vehicle route and after the route is established game sometimes crashes (didn't notice exactly when), and then you can only load autosave which was created before the route was established - attempts to load any newer autosave result in crash. Reproducible.
By the way, is there anywhere a description of all those pax dest options?
Re: yet another...err...my patch pack (r12892)
can u post a patch file without DayLength patch plz or how do i delet it for patch file
or add a setting to disable it
or add a setting to disable it
Re: yet another...err...my patch pack (r12892)
something wrong when setting it to 1 ?Knatte wrote:can u post a patch file without DayLength patch plz or how do i delet it for patch file
or add a setting to disable it
Re: yet another...err...my patch pack (r12892)
sry it looked like it gone slower then normal, but it does not
Re: yet another...err...my patch pack (r12892)
it's the porn downloads in the background ^^Knatte wrote:sry it looked like it gone slower then normal, but it does not
- BlueEagle_nl
- Transport Coordinator
- Posts: 352
- Joined: 28 Jan 2006 09:44
- Skype: tilly5014
- Location: Tillywood, The Netherlands
Re: yet another...err...my patch pack (r12892)
Roest, I noticed when applying your Patch including PaxDest on last week's source (r12904), PaxDest broke. It gave some problems with some ottdRectangle rect; definition somewhere in station.cmd.cpp when I'm right...
Have you found/Are you looking for a solution for this yet, so I can bring PaxDest back in an up-to-date-with-trunk-build?
I must say, this patchpack is awesome though!
Have you found/Are you looking for a solution for this yet, so I can bring PaxDest back in an up-to-date-with-trunk-build?
I must say, this patchpack is awesome though!
Re: yet another...err...my patch pack (r12892)
Replace ottd_Rec... with Rect and replace members max_x with right etc.
- Toni Babelony
- Tycoon
- Posts: 1389
- Joined: 07 Jul 2006 09:34
- Skype: toni_babelony
- Location: Sagamihara-shi, Japan
- Contact:
Re: yet another...err...my patch pack (r12892)
Roest? Could you please update this patchpack to the latest nightly, as OTTD supports the dynamic engine pool now. Much appreciated by many I presume!
Retired JapanSet developer and creator of TIAS.
Re: yet another...err...my patch pack (r12892)
Already on it right now.Toni Babelony wrote:Roest? Could you please update this patchpack to the latest nightly, as OTTD supports the dynamic engine pool now. Much appreciated by many I presume!
- Toni Babelony
- Tycoon
- Posts: 1389
- Joined: 07 Jul 2006 09:34
- Skype: toni_babelony
- Location: Sagamihara-shi, Japan
- Contact:
Re: yet another...err...my patch pack (r12892)
You're a (coding) God! 

Retired JapanSet developer and creator of TIAS.
Re: yet another...err...my patch pack (r12930)
updated to r12930
updated newgrf gui
updated quick goto
removed daylength
Daylength gave me some troubles merging it with the other patches, so i decided to leave it out for now. Will look into it when i have more time.
updated newgrf gui
updated quick goto
removed daylength
Daylength gave me some troubles merging it with the other patches, so i decided to leave it out for now. Will look into it when i have more time.
Last edited by Roest on 05 May 2008 08:14, edited 1 time in total.
Re: yet another...err...my patch pack (r12930)
Updated the .patch files. Daylength is in again. The binaries are still without it though.
Re: yet another...err...my patch pack (r12930)
heh. can't explain.
when i apply patch and make a build with my visual studio, the game crashes after establishing the first pax route.
when i use your binaries - everything seems to be ok...
when i apply patch and make a build with my visual studio, the game crashes after establishing the first pax route.
when i use your binaries - everything seems to be ok...
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests