(WIP) New name: Everlasting toxic

maley123 · Post by **maley123** » 01 Nov 2005 20:28

Give Your Thoughts, opinions and ideas here

LocArny · Post by **LocArny** » 01 Nov 2005 20:33

Well, post some screenies first

maley123 · Post by **maley123** » 01 Nov 2005 20:51

kk Remeber work in progress and it was not just 1 chemical bomb but 5 and some normal bombs

JTanczos · Post by **JTanczos** » 01 Nov 2005 22:35

More tasteful names would be "Toxicity" or even something like "Chemical explosion" or accident.

Those could mean other things than just terrorists unless that is what you are going for.

Food for thought... chemical bombs are designed to spread the chemical agent, if it made a crater it wouldn't disperse it very effectively.

JT

maley123 · Post by **maley123** » 02 Nov 2005 15:38

yes but when they hit the ground and explode to realise the chemical it makes a crater not big so i never made it big

SpComb · Post by **SpComb** » 02 Nov 2005 15:52

maley123 wrote:yes but when they hit the ground and explode to realise the chemical it makes a crater not big so i never made it big

If it's dropped by air, it never hits the ground... at most, a empty metal shell. In any case, it's still a wierd scenario.

maley123 · Post by **maley123** » 02 Nov 2005 15:57

it's not a weird scenrio chemical bombs explode near the ground so a crater still would be made

Singaporekid · Post by **Singaporekid** » 03 Nov 2005 09:21

Yes it is a weird scenario, not only that, but it is one of the the worst scenarios ever

Illegal_Alien · Post by **Illegal_Alien** » 03 Nov 2005 09:27

What about trying to make an existing reallife place?

Born Acorn · Post by **Born Acorn** » 03 Nov 2005 13:55

Its not very good. A bit flat, for one, and I don't think a Chemical weapons would make a crater. SUre, something explosive would, but chemical ones do not explode. Just go woosh

Yoeri · Post by **Yoeri** » 03 Nov 2005 15:25

maybe this is the next generation of weapons of mass destruction. Chemical, and nuclear bombs in one...

maley123 · Post by **maley123** » 04 Nov 2005 15:23

closed

Severous · Post by **Severous** » 04 Nov 2005 20:34

If you are going to use lots of rocks make them uneaven.

Crossing flat rocks like that costs nothing more than normal terrain.

Uneven rocks though. These cost more than normal land to level out. A lot more. Combine this with a lack of ways to make money (limited vehicle mix?) and you have a scenario that will be dominated by expensive building through difficult terrain. Of course the rocks and bomb holes have to offer no alternative route around the edges.

Post by **Chrill** » 26 Nov 2005 12:11

You dit it again, Maley. Post a thread where noone like what you do...

maley123 · Post by **maley123** » 26 Nov 2005 12:22

not fair

Post by **Chrill** » 26 Nov 2005 12:40

but true...

spaceman-spiff · Post by **spaceman-spiff** » 26 Nov 2005 12:46

Chrilldevil, stop picking on him, leave him alone, stop doing that in every single topic

Post by **Chrill** » 03 Dec 2005 11:44

sorry maley, and spiff.

Transport Tycoon Forums

(WIP) New name: Everlasting toxic

(WIP) New name: Everlasting toxic

Who is online