
Anyhoo - C&NW c40-8
4000 hp
174 tonnes
70 mph
480 kN (estamined)
year 1987-1996
runcost 19000/yr
price ??
Moderator: Graphics Moderators
That replaces something in one climate, right?DanMacK wrote:C40-8's looking good
Oh. Your. God.Oz wrote:Been working on the GCT a bit. Wanted to let you guys take a look, and feedback would be greatly appreciated as always.
Cheers!
That's not the way GCT really is, though.cornelius wrote:You could maybe give the glazed section transparency so we could get a peek at the trains inside.
Well, it should be there now. (Press Apply in the New Graphics Status window to get it into an existing Arctic game.)krtaylor wrote:Oracle wrote:Someone told me not to put it in Arctic, I'm sure.krtaylor wrote:2. Where's the Shay? It should be available through the whole steam era.Well, it should be...
I believe that there is quite possibly a coding problem but the town names code will definitely not be happy under some combinations of parameters so I am not going to put them in the main GRF, and that's not going to change any time soon.krtaylor wrote:AFA town names, I'm convinced there's a Patch bug as I've described elsewhere, or a significant coding misunderstanding. Once that is nailed down, I imagine they'll be fine. The town names really ought to be included in the set itself when it's released, of course assuming we iron the bugs out. But then, that's what we're working on.
Thanks! I am trying, but it's a long and tedious job. (Your alignment guide is still very useful, thoughuzurpator wrote:The quality is superb - especially positioning of the sprites has much improved since the last revision
Changed.uzurpator wrote:Consolidation - power is too much - it should be in the 1200-1500 hp range.
You've made me realise that the weights of articulated locos have been messed up for quite some time now. I forgot that when Josef made second and third (and any more) pieces of articulated locos not contribute power or TE, no weight was added so tenders now have zero weight, in effect. I think that I've fixed this now, so all locos do have the correct weight, but please check and see.uzurpator wrote:Also - weight is wrong - should be about 90-100 tons. Is 40. [...] Also [Shay] weight should be about 110 tonnes.
Mikado is too light - 129 tons - should be 240+ tons.
Changed the year. But didn't you notice that double tenders are only added to locos built in 1955 or later, with single tenders before that date?uzurpator wrote:N&w Y6b [...] - yr 1936. And a single tender. Double tender Y6b's were song of the future - introduced about 1955.
Could you elaborate?uzurpator wrote:Allegheny has its tender wrongly positioned in horizontal view.
Hmm - 474Ah = 18250 = 50*365 so 1970 to me so I can only suggest pressing Apply in the New Graphics Status window in case your game has the old data.DanMacK wrote:re: the End-Of-Train Device, I had it come in in my current game around 1958 so something's amiss there
Changed.DanMacK wrote:re: the 2-8-2, it should be "USRA 'Mikado'
I didn't quite have enough time to fix this before I left but we do have NJT cars on the ALP-46. Will be added ASAP.uzurpator wrote:f40ph - amtrak
f40ph - MBTA + stock
f40ph - NJT + stock (the cars also fit alp 46)
You mean the AEM7, surely? I downgraded it because I read that Amtrak have downgraded it to 6000 hp because of electrical problems. But seeing as you've complained, I've changed it back...uzurpator wrote:Why on earth ALP-7 got derated?
I have done some more work on this but I believe that it's the Amtrak California F59PHI which is at fault, not the bilevels. (And seeing as the two are only used on the same train, that makes enough difference.) I haven't had a chance to look at the Superliners/Genesis yet (although I have seen that problem previously) but I will do so.uzurpator wrote:Cars: Amtrak California Bilevels, Superliners (all), Metra and metra f59phi. All those should be realigned.
Interesting bug, that one. That was a slight oversight on my part but iI don't think it should have worked like that at all. Fixed now, anyway. (Also fixed the green observation car bug you reported, I think.)DanMacK wrote:Also, another bug re: the S2 Northern. It has rong livery override for the coaches, it should pull the Pullman green heavyweights only, regardless of era. Right now it has the N&W coaches and the normal era-specific baggage car.
Changed, I think.DanMacK wrote:Covered Hoppers should be refittable to goods in all 3 climates. The white car and the brown one should only be used for goods, the green one for all, the brown/yellow, red and blue ones should be grains/food only.
These sprites obviously are intended to replace the current blue ones. What do you want the MBTA ones used for, though? MBTA passenger cars behind the GP9 and F7? (If so, what about uzurpator's?)DanMacK wrote:Now, here's the revised RDC sprites.
Brilliant! That's really nice! (The only problem is, as cornelius will tell you, that you will have to split it up into individual sprites...)Oz wrote:Been working on the GCT a bit. Wanted to let you guys take a look, and feedback would be greatly appreciated as always.
Shouldn't be too difficult, as long as Oz correctly splits it up into sprites. We will have to decide how to use it (as in how to cope with larger stations), though.DanMacK wrote:Now the next question... how do we code it
Will be added, although is it a replacement for an existing loco or an entirely new one? And which climates?uzurpator wrote:Anyhoo - C&NW c40-8
I can do just about anything with them, as long as the sprites are cut up correctlyOz wrote:Coding shouldn't be too difficult. I drew it with some inherent symmetry. Once I get it all nice and purty, I'd like to give the sprites to Oracle, to see what he can do with them. If that's OK with Oracle, of course. Then it's on to the opposite view.
No, it's a bug. I spotted it for the Acela Express and JetTrain because I couldn't move the second head but it's a bug here - I've restricted the coaches that you can add but haven't permitted the loco itself to be added. Will be fixed.DanMacK wrote:I'm thinking this is intentional to prevent unnecessary puchases, but it turns out that you can't double-head MU's, be it the MP54, the M-2 or the RDC. I'm assuming this is done due to Continuous power from the coaches?
When it's done! (soonish)Monty wrote:When do You plan to release the next version of the US set with the new engines added?
C40-8 is a new loco for all 3 climates ATM (As is the GP40-2). We noticed a significant lack of new motive power in the 1970-1990 period. krtaylor has the info for the GP40-2 and uzurpator posted the stats for the C40-8.Oracle wrote:Will be added, although is it a replacement for an existing loco or an entirely new one? And which climates?uzurpator wrote:Anyhoo - C&NW c40-8
Oh, and nice (train) graphics, Dan and uzurpator!
Let me clarify this. The MBTA Budd RDCs **look** like Budd RDCs, and IRL they were originally, but in TTD they are just ordinary coaches. They appear behind a GP9 when a GP9 is used to pull passenger cars (basically, it's a livery override). Eventually we will have a proper MBTA GP9 livery. This is because the GP9 is a freight engine with no head-end power or heating equipment for passenger trains, but RDCs were designed to be self powered and provide their own heat. The MBTA took out the prime movers but left in their heaters and generators, thus they could be pulled perfectly well by an ordinary freight engine, which is convenient because MBTA got some cheap.DanMacK wrote:Oracle, the MBTA coaches are to be a livery override if a coach is put behind an MBTA GP9
This isn't entirely true, some roads had GP9's built with steam generators in the long nose. Due to larger fuel tanks and water tanks, the air reservoirs had to be mounted on the roof. This earned the passenger GP7's adn 9's the name "Torpedo Boats" Which, ironically is one of the NYC schemes I'm plannignkrtaylor wrote:This is because the GP9 is a freight engine with no head-end power or heating equipment for passenger trains, but RDCs were designed to be self powered and provide their own heat. The MBTA took out the prime movers but left in their heaters and generators, thus they could be pulled perfectly well by an ordinary freight engine, which is convenient because MBTA got some cheap..
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests