Multi-track overhead portals
Moderator: Graphics Moderators
Multi-track overhead portals
I wondered if it's possible to redraw the single-track overhead portals to multi-track portals when another track is added next to existing electrified track. I personally think it can be done with the same routine that manages the fences on the side of the track. These fences disappear when another track is added to it. Instead of letting it disappear it should replace something this time though.
-
- Tycoon
- Posts: 14275
- Joined: 09 Jan 2003 08:37
Hmm, you could add the stuff I explained you in #tycoon,
it should make some stuff clearly (the fence routine can't be used for that as I told you)
it should make some stuff clearly (the fence routine can't be used for that as I told you)
TTDPatch dev in retirement ... Search a grf, try Grf Crawler 0.9 - now with even faster details view and new features...


I would definitely really like it; something like this:

(Sorry for linked image but it breaks copyright to attach it here.)
It would look much better, although how much work it might require is another matter.
(Sorry for linked image but it breaks copyright to attach it here.)
It would look much better, although how much work it might require is another matter.
US Train Set v0.87.1 now released: http://www.tt-forums.net/viewtopic.php?t=8754
Don't forget to read the manual: http://wiki.ttdpatch.net/tiki-index.php?page=Manual
Don't forget to read the manual: http://wiki.ttdpatch.net/tiki-index.php?page=Manual
I just nodded yes to everything you wroteeis_os wrote:Hmm, you could add the stuff I explained you in #tycoon,
it should make some stuff clearly (the fence routine can't be used for that as I told you)

Suggest you have this situation:
###EEENEME###
with ###= fence, E = electrified track, N = normal track, M= Maglev/Monorail track
The left E-tile checks if there is electrified track on the left and right -> there isn't on the left, there is on the right -> so it starts building a left-sided support post;
The 2nd E checks the same -> there is track on both sides so it builds a horizontal portal beam;
The 3rd E checks both and see there is no electrified track on the right but there is on the left -> right-sided support post;
N does nothing;
4th E checks and finds no electrified track on both sides -> builds normal, single-track portal;
M does nothing;
last E checks and finds no electrified track on both sides -> builds normal, single-track portal;
Easy!
I actually worked on this while I did some of the elrails features. I came to the following conclusions:
- these cross-spans would be extremely difficult to do
- they won't actually look good
For the second point, one problem is that TTD's rails are really very far apart, and a cross-span would look too much out of proportion. The distance between tracks should be about half what it is now for it to look good. It's just not worth it.
I've also looked into simply making dual pylons with one pylon supporting two wires, but they have the same problem.
- these cross-spans would be extremely difficult to do
- they won't actually look good
For the second point, one problem is that TTD's rails are really very far apart, and a cross-span would look too much out of proportion. The distance between tracks should be about half what it is now for it to look good. It's just not worth it.
I've also looked into simply making dual pylons with one pylon supporting two wires, but they have the same problem.
Best idea would be that somebody draws them actually (not perfect, but to get an idea),
using two layers, background layer TTD electric rail without supports,
second layer with the supports. (two layers because the second layer can be used as start point for drawing them then)
I would suggest to make only pylons, and then connecting all with wires.
It's the common way in Germany to use wires for the track span, I don't know what the way is in other countries. Oracle's picture shows to big supports for TTD I think...
using two layers, background layer TTD electric rail without supports,
second layer with the supports. (two layers because the second layer can be used as start point for drawing them then)
I would suggest to make only pylons, and then connecting all with wires.
Code: Select all
|-.---.-|
|.. .. |
| pylon
.. track
-.---.- wire
TTDPatch dev in retirement ... Search a grf, try Grf Crawler 0.9 - now with even faster details view and new features...


Perhaps this for even tracks:
And for uneven tracks:
Or perhaps just dont make any difference?
Code: Select all
_______
| ' ' |
| _ _ |
Code: Select all
_________
| ' ' | '
| _ _ | _
-
- Tycoon
- Posts: 14275
- Joined: 09 Jan 2003 08:37
For uneven tracks:
Code: Select all
_______
| ' ' | '|
| _ _ | _|
what are you looking at? it's a signature!

You don't have that, there are left part, middle part, right part
middle parts have to fit together...
But my standpoint is that the dutch system is to much metall, and wouldn't look good in TTD...
TTDPatch dev in retirement ... Search a grf, try Grf Crawler 0.9 - now with even faster details view and new features...


But horizontal it's only made by writes:
Here you can see a model train picture how they are in Germany mostly:
http://www.modellbahn-bau.de/oberleitung.html
Code: Select all
||\ /||
||---------||
|| ||
|| _ _ ||
http://www.modellbahn-bau.de/oberleitung.html
TTDPatch dev in retirement ... Search a grf, try Grf Crawler 0.9 - now with even faster details view and new features...


Here is my overpainted Sample how it could look,
it's not very realistic, but it doesn't look to bad...
it's not very realistic, but it doesn't look to bad...
- Attachments
-
- overhead_g_sample.png (4.55 KiB) Viewed 6635 times
TTDPatch dev in retirement ... Search a grf, try Grf Crawler 0.9 - now with even faster details view and new features...


You're right: it's not too bad, but I'm not sure whether I prefer it to the current implementation ATM. Could you put some vertical or diagonal lines on it to join them up, because it just doesn't look quite right to me. Maybe something like

(off the Loughborough Uni web site, Prof. Frink) or http://westcoastrail.fotopic.net/photo.php?id=2026502 would be better?
[OT]To avoid digging up a very old thread, I decided to post this here. I found the following map which might be of interest to any Brits wondering about where is electrified track in Britain with what system: http://www.trackoff.org/pdf/Electricity%20Dangers.pdf [/OT]
(off the Loughborough Uni web site, Prof. Frink) or http://westcoastrail.fotopic.net/photo.php?id=2026502 would be better?
[OT]To avoid digging up a very old thread, I decided to post this here. I found the following map which might be of interest to any Brits wondering about where is electrified track in Britain with what system: http://www.trackoff.org/pdf/Electricity%20Dangers.pdf [/OT]
US Train Set v0.87.1 now released: http://www.tt-forums.net/viewtopic.php?t=8754
Don't forget to read the manual: http://wiki.ttdpatch.net/tiki-index.php?page=Manual
Don't forget to read the manual: http://wiki.ttdpatch.net/tiki-index.php?page=Manual
- Louie Armstrong
- Tycoon
- Posts: 4053
- Joined: 03 Dec 2003 23:02
- Location: Buckingham, Buckinghamshire - England
i am working on new gantry mounted 2way signals, and i was going to make it so it would look like they are spanning double tracks when placed adjacent on two tracks but also not look stupid/silly when placed on single track.
Official TT-Jewel Staite FanClub
Official TT-Ellen Page FanClub
Official TT-Hayley Williams FanClub
Official TT-generic yet cute emo woman FanClub
jonty-comp wrote:I accidentally wedged my frigate between some rocks. D:
-
- Tycoon
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: 30 May 2003 15:20
- Location: Somewhere
*drools*eis_os wrote:Here is my overpainted Sample how it could look,
it's not very realistic, but it doesn't look to bad...
we also could have this:
Code: Select all
__________________________________
| \___ \___ | /
| O O |__/O
| |
| |
| [o o] [o o] | [o o]
Legend:
O:Electric wire
[o o]:ONE track
\___:panto holder
|:Pole
____:Main panto holder
or these:
1-track
2-track
3-track
4-track
5-track
6-track
1-track
Code: Select all
_____
| ' |
|. .|
Code: Select all
__________
| ' ' |
|. . . .|
Code: Select all
_______________
| ' ' ' |
|. . . . . .|
Code: Select all
___________________
| ' ' | ' ' |
|. . . .|. . . .|
Code: Select all
_______________________
| ' | ' ' ' | ' |
|. .|. . . . . .|. .|
Code: Select all
____________________________
| ' ' | ' ' | ' ' |
|. . . .|. . . .|. . . .|
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests