Yes this is happen in wineJGR wrote:I presume this is in Wine?ecolortest wrote:A bug in this version 0.27.1
Assertion failed at line 75 of /home/jgr/openttd/cross-win32/src/fontcache.cpp: IsPrintable(key)
This is happen if do click a Game Options
I will look into it, but I don't anticipate much success in resolving the issue.
You'll probably be better building for your platform (Linux?).
JGR's Patch Pack
Moderator: OpenTTD Developers
-
- Engineer
- Posts: 19
- Joined: 12 Oct 2016 07:46
Re: JGR's Patch Pack
Re: JGR's Patch Pack
Hello
Tschö, Auge
What do you want to tell me?SimYouLater wrote:Oh! Congrats, then! Sorry I assumed you were inexperienced, you obviously know more than I do.
Tschö, Auge
-
- Chief Executive
- Posts: 675
- Joined: 03 Apr 2016 20:19
Re: JGR's Patch Pack
I'm being sincere. I guess that was easy to mistake for sarcasm. >_<Auge wrote:Hello
What do you want to tell me?SimYouLater wrote:Oh! Congrats, then! Sorry I assumed you were inexperienced, you obviously know more than I do.
Tschö, Auge
Licenses for my work...
You automatically have my permission to re-license graphics or code by me if needed for use in any project that is not GPL v2, on the condition that if you release any derivatives of my graphics they're automatically considered as ALSO GPL v2 (code may remain unreleased, but please do provide it) and carry this provision in GPL v2 uses.
Please ask someone in-the-know to be sure that the graphics are done by me. Especially TTD-Scale, long story.
You automatically have my permission to re-license graphics or code by me if needed for use in any project that is not GPL v2, on the condition that if you release any derivatives of my graphics they're automatically considered as ALSO GPL v2 (code may remain unreleased, but please do provide it) and carry this provision in GPL v2 uses.
Please ask someone in-the-know to be sure that the graphics are done by me. Especially TTD-Scale, long story.
Re: JGR's Patch Pack
Hi, I love your patch pack, and I've been using it for years, but I've noticed on my line where fast trains and slower trains use the same space, there is a lot of stopping and starting which is somewhat annoying and causes a lot of annoyance. That's when I remembered this exists, a yellow signal patch which limits the speed of trains if there's one in the block ahead. Would it be possible that you could add this on to your pack, I think it'd be a great addition to the game .
You can find what I'm on about here.
You can find what I'm on about here.
Re: JGR's Patch Pack
This really do come up once in a while. Maybe JGR should make a list of considered and rejected patches.The Growl wrote:Hi, I love your patch pack, and I've been using it for years, but I've noticed on my line where fast trains and slower trains use the same space, there is a lot of stopping and starting which is somewhat annoying and causes a lot of annoyance. That's when I remembered this exists, a yellow signal patch which limits the speed of trains if there's one in the block ahead. Would it be possible that you could add this on to your pack, I think it'd be a great addition to the game .
You can find what I'm on about here.
It's hard to find the original response now, but the gist is that that patch still has some design problem regarding reservation into junction.
And what annoy me personally the most is that the R-Y-YY-G is European, while Japan use R-YY-Y-G. My railway knowledge and play style is predominantly Japan so this really annoy me. But this really is unrelated.
Re: JGR's Patch Pack
I mean that problem with the order of cautionariy signals can be fixed graphically...
I'd say that this stops being a problem if you want to put the time in to fully timetable your trains. Also, I played with this patch and found it didn't entirely help traffic jams.
I'd say that this stops being a problem if you want to put the time in to fully timetable your trains. Also, I played with this patch and found it didn't entirely help traffic jams.
- piratescooby
- Route Supervisor
- Posts: 451
- Joined: 21 Nov 2014 12:39
- Location: The Granite City.
Re: JGR's Patch Pack
viewtopic.php?f=33&t=52085&start=20 , this sounds good , seems to be the logical answer to having a slower train in front .
Re: JGR's Patch Pack
Or
Just run a four track (two up, two down) with crossovers regularly spaced.
I do this especially on passenger lines with slow mail and fast passenger trains.
Fast trains then change track and overtake the slow train.
You do need the space for four tracks of course and there is a need to drop to two track (one up, one down) sometimes because of space restrictions, just signal appropriately.
Just run a four track (two up, two down) with crossovers regularly spaced.
I do this especially on passenger lines with slow mail and fast passenger trains.
Fast trains then change track and overtake the slow train.
You do need the space for four tracks of course and there is a need to drop to two track (one up, one down) sometimes because of space restrictions, just signal appropriately.
- SquireJames
- Tycoon
- Posts: 1863
- Joined: 07 Aug 2004 11:56
- Skype: squirejames5
- Location: Stoke-on-Trent
- Contact:
Re: JGR's Patch Pack
I do this, but I also use the signalling restrictions to keep slower trains on the outside and faster trains on the inside. Quite happily, this also takes into account breakdowns, so an express that has broken down and is now crawling along will choose the slow line rather than the fast.mak wrote:Or
Just run a four track (two up, two down) with crossovers regularly spaced.
I do this especially on passenger lines with slow mail and fast passenger trains.
Fast trains then change track and overtake the slow train.
You do need the space for four tracks of course and there is a need to drop to two track (one up, one down) sometimes because of space restrictions, just signal appropriately.
Re: JGR's Patch Pack
Been a while since I just played the game, as I have been mostly developing stuff for the game.
But I want to try to get back into playing a bit more and this patchpack seems to have all the features I would like to have in a game and will hopefully in the future get even more desireable things like multiple roadtypes and realistic shunting.
Excellent work!!
I do have two questions though..
- Would it be possible to add a parameter in the gamesettings to disable the (un)loading penalty for trains that are longer than a station?
- Are there plans to add a part of Cirdans NewMapFeatures fork, that allows two different railtypes on one tile? (when the rails are horizontal/vertical)?
But I want to try to get back into playing a bit more and this patchpack seems to have all the features I would like to have in a game and will hopefully in the future get even more desireable things like multiple roadtypes and realistic shunting.
Excellent work!!
I do have two questions though..
- Would it be possible to add a parameter in the gamesettings to disable the (un)loading penalty for trains that are longer than a station?
- Are there plans to add a part of Cirdans NewMapFeatures fork, that allows two different railtypes on one tile? (when the rails are horizontal/vertical)?
Projects: http://www.tt-forums.net/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=57266
Screenshots: http://www.tt-forums.net/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=56959
Scenario of The Netherlands: viewtopic.php?f=60&t=87604
Winner of the following screenshot competitions:
sep 2012, jan 2013, apr 2013, aug 2013, mar 2014, mar 2016, oct 2020
All my work is released under GPL-license (either V2 or V3), if not clearly stated otherwise.
Screenshots: http://www.tt-forums.net/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=56959
Scenario of The Netherlands: viewtopic.php?f=60&t=87604
Winner of the following screenshot competitions:
sep 2012, jan 2013, apr 2013, aug 2013, mar 2014, mar 2016, oct 2020
All my work is released under GPL-license (either V2 or V3), if not clearly stated otherwise.
Re: JGR's Patch Pack
You know that you can change that in openttd.cfg, right? yapf.rail_shorter_platform_penalty etc.Quast65 wrote: - Would it be possible to add a parameter in the gamesettings to disable the (un)loading penalty for trains that are longer than a station?
Re: JGR's Patch Pack
I compile the program myself; you can watch the video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHj1xpgWbnkecolortest wrote:Yes this is happen in wineJGR wrote:I presume this is in Wine?ecolortest wrote:A bug in this version 0.27.1
Assertion failed at line 75 of /home/jgr/openttd/cross-win32/src/fontcache.cpp: IsPrintable(key)
This is happen if do click a Game Options
I will look into it, but I don't anticipate much success in resolving the issue.
You'll probably be better building for your platform (Linux?).
It's in the Czech language, I hope it will not deter you.
My YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/c/nirasa/videos Czech language.
Re: JGR's Patch Pack
Tried it, didnt work…ino wrote:You know that you can change that in openttd.cfg, right? yapf.rail_shorter_platform_penalty etc.Quast65 wrote: - Would it be possible to add a parameter in the gamesettings to disable the (un)loading penalty for trains that are longer than a station?
Maybe its an extra penalty over the already existing overhang-penalty of the game.
What is needed is that a part of economy.cpp needs to be removed/altered (I removed it for the old game I am currently using and then recompiled that game and that does the trick, but it would be nicer if it is included as a patch).
Hackalittlebit already has made a patch:
https://bugs.openttd.org/task/3622
Discussion-topic is here:
viewtopic.php?p=854926#p854926
Maybe something to include (if possible) in the cheat-menu (as it is kind of a cheat )
This would for example be nice for short stations at the end of a tunnel, that way the train stops partially in the tunnel, faking an underground station.
Or for a short station in between or at the end of a bridge, to fake a station on a bridge.
In both cases it would be nice then to not get a (un)loading penalty
Projects: http://www.tt-forums.net/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=57266
Screenshots: http://www.tt-forums.net/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=56959
Scenario of The Netherlands: viewtopic.php?f=60&t=87604
Winner of the following screenshot competitions:
sep 2012, jan 2013, apr 2013, aug 2013, mar 2014, mar 2016, oct 2020
All my work is released under GPL-license (either V2 or V3), if not clearly stated otherwise.
Screenshots: http://www.tt-forums.net/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=56959
Scenario of The Netherlands: viewtopic.php?f=60&t=87604
Winner of the following screenshot competitions:
sep 2012, jan 2013, apr 2013, aug 2013, mar 2014, mar 2016, oct 2020
All my work is released under GPL-license (either V2 or V3), if not clearly stated otherwise.
Re: JGR's Patch Pack
Oh, sorry, I thought you mean pathfinding panelty, not loading speed panelty.Quast65 wrote:Tried it, didnt work…ino wrote:You know that you can change that in openttd.cfg, right? yapf.rail_shorter_platform_penalty etc.Quast65 wrote: - Would it be possible to add a parameter in the gamesettings to disable the (un)loading penalty for trains that are longer than a station?
Maybe its an extra penalty over the already existing overhang-penalty of the game.
What is needed is that a part of economy.cpp needs to be removed/altered (I removed it for the old game I am currently using and then recompiled that game and that does the trick, but it would be nicer if it is included as a patch).
Hackalittlebit already has made a patch:
https://bugs.openttd.org/task/3622
Discussion-topic is here:
viewtopic.php?p=854926#p854926
Maybe something to include (if possible) in the cheat-menu (as it is kind of a cheat )
This would for example be nice for short stations at the end of a tunnel, that way the train stops partially in the tunnel, faking an underground station.
Or for a short station in between or at the end of a bridge, to fake a station on a bridge.
In both cases it would be nice then to not get a (un)loading penalty
Reading the original.discussion, if you aim for realistic, JGR has load-through mode (you need to enable in setting, and it will be part of middle/far end/near end cycle. Basically the train will align the first set of wagon to station, load only those wagon, move forward to next set of wagon, repeat. It works and looks real. Not sure if this is what you really want though.
Re: JGR's Patch Pack
No problem, but you got my hopes up a bit that it would be something very simpleino wrote:Oh, sorry, I thought you mean pathfinding panelty, not loading speed panelty.
Sadly not the case..
That is indeed not my aim.ino wrote:JGR has load-through mode … Not sure if this is what you really want though
It is nice and realistic for regular short stations, but my aim is for short stations in combination with a tunnel/bridge.
And then you dont really want the train to crawl along the short station...
EDIT: Also (I may be wrong though) I thought that the load-through mode is for cargo-trains only, not for passengertrains...
Projects: http://www.tt-forums.net/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=57266
Screenshots: http://www.tt-forums.net/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=56959
Scenario of The Netherlands: viewtopic.php?f=60&t=87604
Winner of the following screenshot competitions:
sep 2012, jan 2013, apr 2013, aug 2013, mar 2014, mar 2016, oct 2020
All my work is released under GPL-license (either V2 or V3), if not clearly stated otherwise.
Screenshots: http://www.tt-forums.net/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=56959
Scenario of The Netherlands: viewtopic.php?f=60&t=87604
Winner of the following screenshot competitions:
sep 2012, jan 2013, apr 2013, aug 2013, mar 2014, mar 2016, oct 2020
All my work is released under GPL-license (either V2 or V3), if not clearly stated otherwise.
-
- Chief Executive
- Posts: 675
- Joined: 03 Apr 2016 20:19
Re: JGR's Patch Pack
It is for freight only. Passenger trains would need to be handled differently to get what you're after, at this point you simply have to have a full-length platform.Quast65 wrote:No problem, but you got my hopes up a bit that it would be something very simpleino wrote:Oh, sorry, I thought you mean pathfinding panelty, not loading speed panelty.
Sadly not the case..
That is indeed not my aim.ino wrote:JGR has load-through mode … Not sure if this is what you really want though
It is nice and realistic for regular short stations, but my aim is for short stations in combination with a tunnel/bridge.
And then you dont really want the train to crawl along the short station...
EDIT: Also (I may be wrong though) I thought that the load-through mode is for cargo-trains only, not for passengertrains...
Licenses for my work...
You automatically have my permission to re-license graphics or code by me if needed for use in any project that is not GPL v2, on the condition that if you release any derivatives of my graphics they're automatically considered as ALSO GPL v2 (code may remain unreleased, but please do provide it) and carry this provision in GPL v2 uses.
Please ask someone in-the-know to be sure that the graphics are done by me. Especially TTD-Scale, long story.
You automatically have my permission to re-license graphics or code by me if needed for use in any project that is not GPL v2, on the condition that if you release any derivatives of my graphics they're automatically considered as ALSO GPL v2 (code may remain unreleased, but please do provide it) and carry this provision in GPL v2 uses.
Please ask someone in-the-know to be sure that the graphics are done by me. Especially TTD-Scale, long story.
Re: JGR's Patch Pack
Hi. I have been trying to play in a server that uses your patch version 0.27.0. But everytime the map gets loaded the game gets super slow, my CPU usage goes to 100% and the only clue i get about this is using debug mode. i get this error spammed in console.
I have digged in the code trying to find the newgrf responsible or if it is something with the patch or openttd itself but i can't seem to find it.
I'll attach the server savefile so you can test if it happens to you too and if you have any clue on what is causing this.
UPDATE: i found the newgrf responsible for the errors. now i am asking the creator what he knows. It was 2cc Trains In NML version 3.0-alpha2.
Code: Select all
dbg: [grf] Unhandled vehicle variable 0x61, type 0x0
I'll attach the server savefile so you can test if it happens to you too and if you have any clue on what is causing this.
UPDATE: i found the newgrf responsible for the errors. now i am asking the creator what he knows. It was 2cc Trains In NML version 3.0-alpha2.
- Attachments
-
- autosave15.sav
- (4.99 MiB) Downloaded 56 times
-
- Engineer
- Posts: 21
- Joined: 28 Apr 2016 11:11
Re: JGR's Patch Pack
Hi JGR, I have a little bit question here.
Suppose the following branch line scenario:
Those red and green were signals and its direction. All of them were path signals.
My question is, how I can hold train 2 in station B until train 1 depart from station A, then pass train 2 in station B using routefinding restriction? Is there a way to do it besides making new crossovers in station A or double tracking the track?
Thanks
Suppose the following branch line scenario:
Those red and green were signals and its direction. All of them were path signals.
My question is, how I can hold train 2 in station B until train 1 depart from station A, then pass train 2 in station B using routefinding restriction? Is there a way to do it besides making new crossovers in station A or double tracking the track?
Thanks
Re: JGR's Patch Pack
Not sure if I understand your diagram correctly.AkipTsaqif wrote:Hi JGR, I have a little bit question here.
Suppose the following branch line scenario:
Those red and green were signals and its direction. All of them were path signals.
My question is, how I can hold train 2 in station B until train 1 depart from station A, then pass train 2 in station B using routefinding restriction? Is there a way to do it besides making new crossovers in station A or double tracking the track?
Thanks
But first, you don't really need two Red-colored signal on the single-track line. Then train departing left station will need to reserve the path all the way into platform in order for it to depart.
Though, that does not look realistic. If you want it realistic while keeping it simple, then
Of course, this is still not perfect, but it's easy to do. If you don't want the train to reserve the platform early (maybe you need it for train from the other line in the meantime), then you need to use SLOT. You need to enable them first in settting (iirc it's "Advanced routefinding restriction" setting).
Hope it helps.
-
- Engineer
- Posts: 21
- Joined: 28 Apr 2016 11:11
Re: JGR's Patch Pack
Thanks for answering. Yeah I'm trying to make my rail lines as realistic as possible.ino wrote:Not sure if I understand your diagram correctly.
But first, you don't really need two Red-colored signal on the single-track line. Then train departing left station will need to reserve the path all the way into platform in order for it to depart.
Though, that does not look realistic. If you want it realistic while keeping it simple, then Of course, this is still not perfect, but it's easy to do. If you don't want the train to reserve the platform early (maybe you need it for train from the other line in the meantime), then you need to use SLOT. You need to enable them first in settting (iirc it's "Advanced routefinding restriction" setting). Hope it helps.
What does reserve through actually do? I never use that because I don't understand its usage. And yeah, I'm still confused about the slots. Could you please elaborate it to me by using my diagram above?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests