Page 118 of 235

Re: JGR's Patch Pack

Posted: 06 Aug 2019 20:08
by JGR
alluke wrote: 06 Aug 2019 18:09 Compiling this on MacOS is a pain, do I really need to install 6 gigabytes of Xcode I don't need, to run single 17 mb application? :roll:
Apple go out of their way to prevent developing for their platforms without buying into their hardware. I don't own any Apple hardware, nor do I intend to acquire any, and therefore I cannot produce binaries for Apple platforms.
Other users may well choose to build on and for Apple platforms and upload the resulting binaries.

Re: JGR's Patch Pack

Posted: 06 Aug 2019 20:25
by andythenorth
JGR wrote: 06 Aug 2019 20:08Other users may well choose to build on and for Apple platforms and upload the resulting binaries.
He could just get clang and all the deps out of the ports tree (homebrew or macports). But that would be effort compared to complaining about a 6GB download and hoping someone else solves his problem :twisted:

Also, it would be about 2.5GB from the ports tree :twisted:

Re: JGR's Patch Pack

Posted: 07 Aug 2019 16:35
by Lw25
I came across different bug in different save (I can provide save on dm if needed). Even thought route is clear train do not want to enter the tunnel with signaling in it. Whole route is clear. There is nothing in the tunnel. Both 31.3 and 31.2 have that. I do not have that in my previous game.

Re: JGR's Patch Pack

Posted: 07 Aug 2019 16:51
by JGR
Lw25 wrote: 07 Aug 2019 16:35 I came across different bug in different save (I can provide save on dm if needed). Even thought route is clear train do not want to enter the tunnel with signaling in it. Whole route is clear. There is nothing in the tunnel. Both 31.3 and 31.2 have that. I do not have that in my previous game.
A savegame which demonstrates the issue would be useful, thanks.

Re: JGR's Patch Pack

Posted: 08 Aug 2019 00:14
by Lw25
JGR wrote: 07 Aug 2019 16:51
Lw25 wrote: 07 Aug 2019 16:35 I came across different bug in different save (I can provide save on dm if needed). Even thought route is clear train do not want to enter the tunnel with signaling in it. Whole route is clear. There is nothing in the tunnel. Both 31.3 and 31.2 have that. I do not have that in my previous game.
A savegame which demonstrates the issue would be useful, thanks.
Save send by dm :wink:

Re: JGR's Patch Pack

Posted: 10 Aug 2019 18:46
by BW89
I noticed that trolleys overtake eachother in 0.32 RC1

Re: JGR's Patch Pack

Posted: 18 Aug 2019 16:12
by JGR
BW89 wrote: 10 Aug 2019 18:46 I noticed that trolleys overtake eachother in 0.32 RC1
In v0.31.0 a setting was added (default on) to allow articulated road vehicles to overtake other road vehicles.
The setting can be switched off to get back the old behaviour.

Re: JGR's Patch Pack

Posted: 19 Aug 2019 09:20
by Auge
Hello
JGR wrote: 18 Aug 2019 16:12
BW89 wrote: 10 Aug 2019 18:46 I noticed that trolleys overtake eachother in 0.32 RC1
In v0.31.0 a setting was added (default on) to allow articulated road vehicles to overtake other road vehicles.
The setting can be switched off to get back the old behaviour.
Is it possible to restrict overtaking in general or for vehicle classes/groups in the vehicle set? Trams are not able to overtake even they are not articulated and game wise they are "only" street vehicles. The overtaking restriction gets handled somewhere. Question is, is it handled in the game code or in the vehicle set?

Tschö, Auge

Re: JGR's Patch Pack

Posted: 19 Aug 2019 17:47
by JGR
Auge wrote: 19 Aug 2019 09:20 Hello

Is it possible to restrict overtaking in general or for vehicle classes/groups in the vehicle set? Trams are not able to overtake even they are not articulated and game wise they are "only" street vehicles. The overtaking restriction gets handled somewhere. Question is, is it handled in the game code or in the vehicle set?

Tschö, Auge
It's handled in the game code. Trams may not overtake under any circumstances. Non-tram road vehicles are all handled the same way and there isn't any NewGRF control of the overtaking behaviour.
In principle NewGRF properties could be added for this but I would doubt that such a feature would see much/any use.

Re: JGR's Patch Pack

Posted: 20 Aug 2019 09:29
by Auge
Hello
JGR wrote: 19 Aug 2019 17:47
Auge wrote: 19 Aug 2019 09:20 Is [restricting overtaking] handled in the game code or in the vehicle set?
It's handled in the game code. Trams may not overtake under any circumstances. Non-tram road vehicles are all handled the same way and there isn't any NewGRF control of the overtaking behaviour.
With NRT we have now the "special" case of non-rail-dependent road vehicles (trolleys) that can not overtake (in reality).
JGR wrote: 19 Aug 2019 17:47 In principle NewGRF properties could be added for this but I would doubt that such a feature would see much/any use.
I can not estimate the incidence of such features use. It is only relevant for trolleys (until someone "invents" a further case) and ((currently) hardcoded in the game) for trams so its use would be restricted for these vehicle classes. Or we live with this being unrealistic because it's not the end of the world.

Tschö, Auge

Re: JGR's Patch Pack

Posted: 20 Aug 2019 10:33
by JGR
Auge wrote: 20 Aug 2019 09:29With NRT we have now the "special" case of non-rail-dependent road vehicles (trolleys) that can not overtake (in reality).
Being pedantic, trolley buses can and do overtake other (usually stationary) non-trolley road vehicles.
Auge wrote: 20 Aug 2019 09:29I can not estimate the incidence of such features use. It is only relevant for trolleys (until someone "invents" a further case) and ((currently) hardcoded in the game) for trams so its use would be restricted for these vehicle classes. Or we live with this being unrealistic because it's not the end of the world.

Tschö, Auge
If a NewGRF author was actively keen to implement this feature in their GRF to run on this patchpack then I could look into it, but I don't really want to implement such features speculatively.

Re: JGR's Patch Pack

Posted: 21 Aug 2019 07:15
by Auge
Hello
JGR wrote: 20 Aug 2019 10:33 If a NewGRF author was actively keen to implement this feature [(enabling or disabling overtaking)] in their GRF to run on this patchpack then I could look into it, but I don't really want to implement such features speculatively.
You are right, if it is only an issue in the patchpack it would be a much to high effort to solve it as an isolated application. I expect this to be also an issue in OpenTTD itself. If it is, it should be solved there if the developers think it is worth the effort. At the end it's – as said before – not the end of the world to have sprites in a game that behaves different from the real world.

Tschö, Auge

Re: JGR's Patch Pack

Posted: 22 Aug 2019 00:20
by deco
Hi, i new user in here ..
i play openTTD on android using JGR patch apk. at latest version 0.25.2.81 apk still use your patch v0.25.2

i try to patch with your latest pack version 0.31.3 windows x64 / x32 but the game has force close if open it.

how i can play with your latest pack on my android. i test some newgrf can read on game but the grf cant click it, the picture has blacked blurry. maybe need your latest patch.

sorry if my english so bad. thanks if you want reply and give solution of using latest version ..

Re: JGR's Patch Pack

Posted: 22 Aug 2019 03:32
by kamnet
deco wrote: 22 Aug 2019 00:20 how i can play with your latest pack on my android.
The Android port is not maintained by JGR, but by another developer, Pelya. You might want to privately message him to see if he will provide support/help, or just wait for him to compile and release a new version.

Re: JGR's Patch Pack

Posted: 22 Aug 2019 11:57
by deco
kamnet wrote: 22 Aug 2019 03:32
The Android port is not maintained by JGR, but by another developer, Pelya. You might want to privately message him to see if he will provide support/help, or just wait for him to compile and release a new version.
thanks :D
i try to pm him or post into android port

Re: JGR's Patch Pack

Posted: 24 Aug 2019 13:55
by AkipTsaqif
Does the 0.32 rc2 has the same changelog as 0.31.4?

Re: JGR's Patch Pack

Posted: 24 Aug 2019 15:13
by JGR
AkipTsaqif wrote: 24 Aug 2019 13:55 Does the 0.32 rc2 has the same changelog as 0.31.4?
See here: https://github.com/JGRennison/OpenTTD-p ... angelog.md
The changes in 0.31.4 are included.

Re: JGR's Patch Pack

Posted: 25 Aug 2019 12:45
by AkipTsaqif
JGR wrote: 24 Aug 2019 15:13 See here: https://github.com/JGRennison/OpenTTD-p ... angelog.md
The changes in 0.31.4 are included.
Alright thanks.

Anyway, whenever I use some building sets, only the first 4 of them were spawned in the cities, the rest doesn't appear at all. Is this a default behavior in the game code?

Re: JGR's Patch Pack

Posted: 25 Aug 2019 16:15
by Tsylatac
AkipTsaqif wrote: 25 Aug 2019 12:45 Anyway, whenever I use some building sets, only the first 4 of them were spawned in the cities, the rest doesn't appear at all. Is this a default behavior in the game code?
Probably, if they're large sets. It caps around I think 256 unique houses, in the order the newgrfs are listed (and ones that aren't valid for the current year do count toward that limit). If you open up the scenario editor and play with the Place Houses tool you can get a better feel for it, since it won't even list the newgrfs that weren't loaded and the last one will be cut short. (But in case it's a bug, maybe try loading the same sets in the same order in vanilla openttd?)

Lifting this limit is the biggest improvement I wanna see at this point, but idk how feasible that is :P

Re: JGR's Patch Pack

Posted: 25 Aug 2019 16:15
by kamnet
AkipTsaqif wrote: 25 Aug 2019 12:45
JGR wrote: 24 Aug 2019 15:13 See here: https://github.com/JGRennison/OpenTTD-p ... angelog.md
The changes in 0.31.4 are included.
Alright thanks.

Anyway, whenever I use some building sets, only the first 4 of them were spawned in the cities, the rest doesn't appear at all. Is this a default behavior in the game code?
What sets did you use, which climate did you use, and what year did you launch the game?