Graphics without .nfo files [needs coders!]

Bastiaan · Post by **Bastiaan** » 02 Nov 2004 19:24

I think he understands what you mean when you show him this picture.

Bastiaan

Bernhard · Post by **Bernhard** » 03 Nov 2004 06:57

Lakie wrote:
Bernhard wrote:hi Lakie,
that can't be toooo hard for you

if you don't have time i would try............ i think i can code those trains now.

(i'm on work with some other types of S-Bahn, but i think i will finish soon, because i got so much help from you, thx again!!!))
You wish, I can code this, will be simple enough (I'm not completely out of practise).

nice for the offer though.
Hows the progress with the TGV Atlantique ?

Whats a S-Bahn ?

~ Lakie

TGV-Atlantique is ready, not coded by me but from Szappy. Purno must give it free!!!!!!!!!!!

i tried to code the TGV-Duplex yesterday. Progress is good. Not finished yet, my wife needed the PC too

What's an S-Bahn, have you seen the pictures?? i will add one.
S-Bahn is needed in Munich, Berlin and Hamburg for the 'public metropolitan and suburban commuter railway systems' (found this in an translator' it's like the METRO in Paris/Moscow/London, but above, not underground. It's electric and gets its power from an power-gauge (?) (conductor??)

edit @ Purno: the grey colours from the roof had been transparent. Was that my fault during converting from png to pcx??

Website · Post by **Lakie** » 03 Nov 2004 17:49

Erm...

I said I would code the TGV Duplex

. I have already made a grf, just need the stats for the train.
Sorry, but I do like to finish what I start.

Shame about the TGV Atlantique though, you gave up on it?

~ Lakie

Purno · Post by **Purno** » 03 Nov 2004 18:19

Bernhard wrote: TGV-Atlantique is ready, not coded by me but from Szappy. Purno must give it free!!!!!!!!!!!

i tried to code the TGV-Duplex yesterday. Progress is good. Not finished yet, my wife needed the PC too

You can release the Atlantique, I've no time for testing it. (you migth want to let some others test it?)

Bernhard wrote: edit @ Purno: the grey colours from the roof had been transparent. Was that my fault during converting from png to pcx??

I don't see anything transparent. But why are you posting a .jpg? (.jpg has compression, you should use .png IMO)

Bernhard · Post by **Bernhard** » 04 Nov 2004 06:58

i changed all the transparent pixels.
I've got problems with png
I cant read that with my paint-prog. So i convert to bmp. Is that the reason?? but i thought you do your work with paint too??

The pic i loaded up ist jpg because it is smaler. my internet access at home is very slow.

edit: TGV-ATLANTIQUE : http://ttdgraphics.cjb.net/graphid.php?id=106

Bernhard · Post by **Bernhard** » 04 Nov 2004 07:00

Lakie wrote:Erm...

I said I would code the TGV Duplex . I have already made a grf, just need the stats for the train.
Sorry, but I do like to finish what I start.

Shame about the TGV Atlantique though, you gave up on it?

~ Lakie

please , finish. I got some errors. i don't get it finished soon.
It was just do do something that evening. This sight shown is the only one that is correct, all others must be corrected, and i don't have that time at the moment (familiy..................) so, please, it's your turn!!!!!

Purno · Post by **Purno** » 04 Nov 2004 17:41

Bernhard wrote:i changed all the transparent pixels.
I've got problems with png
I cant read that with my paint-prog. So i convert to bmp. Is that the reason?? but i thought you do your work with paint too??

Converting it to bmp should give any problem since I originally used a bmp to draw in. Later I converted it to a png because I can't post bmps on tt-forums.

Website · Post by **Lakie** » 05 Nov 2004 00:01

Once I get some stats from someone I can finish the coding.
Also the bm73 is ready for a release, just need the go ahead from purno.

[edit] after looking at the TGV Atlantique, It seems disapointting.
First a space in the name, ttdpatch didn't like that, no readme.
Ingame, it was ok, but I didn't like the limitted train length.

~ Lakie

Bernhard · Post by **Bernhard** » 05 Nov 2004 07:01

what do you mean with 'It seems disapointting.' ?? i don't understand the word??

The space in the name can be changed, but i had no problem during using it....

Purno · Post by **Purno** » 05 Nov 2004 17:24

Lakie wrote: just need the go ahead from purno.

*gives the go ahead from purno

Bernhard wrote:what do you mean with 'It seems disapointting.' ?? i don't understand the word??

Disappointting; he probably means he expected more than there actually is...

Website · Post by **Lakie** » 05 Nov 2004 18:53

Purno,

Ok, will make final version to night, and update my webbie.

Bernhard,

I was expecting a little more than what was given, but the space in the name was a VERY bad first impression on me.
I suppose if you want a job right do it yourself?

I'll get use to it.

~ Lakie

Purno · Post by **Purno** » 07 Nov 2004 08:49

Another graphic:

The X2000 (from Sweden IIRC)

Bernhard · Post by **Bernhard** » 08 Nov 2004 07:12

@ Lakie............. i wasn't able to code the TGV at that time. So i asked Szappy to code it, bacause he was searching for trains to code to test his new programm.

What did you expected more ? The train can be build as it would be in real life. Speed and loading is correct..................

Now i think i would be able, (learned much from you, thx).
Example is my S-Bahn.
The design isn't perfect. i think there is something to do left.

Szappy · Post by **Szappy** » 08 Nov 2004 07:41

Lakie wrote:Bernhard,

I was expecting a little more than what was given, but the space in the name was a VERY bad first impression on me.
I suppose if you want a job right do it yourself?

I'll get use to it.

~ Lakie

Hey Lakie, that was a quite rude, and most useless feedback I ever got. And the top on it, it came from a coder

WHAT is that gave you a "VERY bad first impression" ?
Was it really one space character in the name of it??? REALLY?
What did you expect, and how do I improve it, if I don't know what's wrong with it?
Next time try some useful feedback. Jeez...

Bernhard · Post by **Bernhard** » 08 Nov 2004 08:28

i heard only positive-Feedback so far. Everybody says........... looking good, fine work.
Compliments to Purno and Szappy

Purno · Post by **Purno** » 08 Nov 2004 17:30

Bernhard wrote:Compliments to Purno and Szappy

Thx.

Website · Post by **Lakie** » 08 Nov 2004 17:48

That one Space character caused TTdpatch to say it didn't even exist.

after renaming it, it worked, so I suppose it wasn't that bad, although not everyone would have seen that error.

however I didn't like having it limitted to one train. (was that done by you or someone else?)

The missing readme didn't give a good impression ether, kinda let it down. although I understand you not wantting to write a readme. (as I also hate writing them.)

Also a few little things that got me ingame... just little qurks, nothing special.

That seem better?

Also I would have coded it, but it was the start of college, as I said earlier I'm always able to help people, just takes sometime.

But Thanks for coding it. (Or Szappy for that case)

[edit] sorry for offending you.

~ Lakie

JEB · Post by **JEB** » 09 Nov 2004 00:34

I noticed the same problem, I renamed it and it fixed just as you said.
I just didn't know what was wrong. Nice train.

Warspite · Post by **Warspite** » 09 Nov 2004 00:37

Can i just say Purno - You are a god

Bernhard · Post by **Bernhard** » 09 Nov 2004 06:56

Warspite wrote:Can i just say Purno - You are a god

i think you can....................

@ Lakie...........i know that you are allways helping, but i was angry don't get it run, i tried for 6 weeks when i read that Szappy is writing a programm to code abd needs stuff to test this prog............... so i asked Szappy, to test with the TGV.

Yes, you're right, a readme would be nice. Maybe i will add one.

I will change the name asap.

Transport Tycoon Forums

Graphics without .nfo files [needs coders!]

Who is online