Canadian Stations Set: Updated 21/01/08 - v0.3d RELEASED!
Moderator: Graphics Moderators
Yaaaay! I've gotten out of having to code another station set! Weee!
Those are looking marvelous, lifeblood and OzTransLtd!
Edit: I have a bit of a psycho-nutso idea that might be possible, I'm not sure myself.
Can the four type of platforms that I coded, the brick, wood, limestone, concrete, whatever, be brought back, and then, all the fancy building elements be placed over the platforms? With the platform type of the station changing depending on what it's built on? I reckon that would be an interesting station set to use, and it means I can retire another station set off .
Those are looking marvelous, lifeblood and OzTransLtd!
Edit: I have a bit of a psycho-nutso idea that might be possible, I'm not sure myself.
Can the four type of platforms that I coded, the brick, wood, limestone, concrete, whatever, be brought back, and then, all the fancy building elements be placed over the platforms? With the platform type of the station changing depending on what it's built on? I reckon that would be an interesting station set to use, and it means I can retire another station set off .
Currently working under the name 'reldred' on Github, and Discord.
NFO/NML coder, part-time patch writer for JGRPP, and all round belligerent.
14:40 <orudge> I can't say I discriminate against any particular user
14:41 <Aegir> orudge: I can!
NFO/NML coder, part-time patch writer for JGRPP, and all round belligerent.
14:40 <orudge> I can't say I discriminate against any particular user
14:41 <Aegir> orudge: I can!
Hmm, I was thinking just detail sprites overlaid ontop of the platforms, stations, seating, etc. But no matter. It was an insane idea anyway .
'tis looking good, lifeblood. Quite good.
'tis looking good, lifeblood. Quite good.
Currently working under the name 'reldred' on Github, and Discord.
NFO/NML coder, part-time patch writer for JGRPP, and all round belligerent.
14:40 <orudge> I can't say I discriminate against any particular user
14:41 <Aegir> orudge: I can!
NFO/NML coder, part-time patch writer for JGRPP, and all round belligerent.
14:40 <orudge> I can't say I discriminate against any particular user
14:41 <Aegir> orudge: I can!
-
- Tycoon
- Posts: 5948
- Joined: 27 Apr 2005 07:09
- Contact:
Not really insane. I do it myself, e.g. here:Hmm, I was thinking just detail sprites overlaid ontop of the platforms, stations, seating, etc. But no matter. It was an insane idea anyway
I.e. there are only 2 crane sprites and 8 container sprites needed (each for x- and y-view) to generate up to 256 combinations.
Of course, this needs another "insane" sprite layout block of some 60kbytes and a perl script to generate it.
regards
Michael
lifeblood, I can't see why that should not be possible; you just need to supply the features in a seperate sprite to the ground(s); ie 1 sprite each for the different bare grounds and another with the benches or light posts. Then it is simply a matter of layering them together, like track ground sprite, ground sprite, BG feature, train, FG features.Aegir wrote: ... station features (buildings, benches, ...) on different ground tiles (wood, gravel, concrete, ...) ....
Look at the sample on the previous page; I've already done that with the crosswalk. The only difference is, that the crosswalk sprite is a complete sprite and not layed onto a standard platform sprite. Definetely 60kB+ sprite layout blocks are unnecessary. ATM, our sample station uses 60 (times 2 for the snowy versions) different sprites and the sprite layout block is a mere 757 bytes plus a few var act-2's.
Interesting. I'm not opposed to it what so ever. The problem is that I'd have to make buffers and full tiles for each platform surface.
*new thought*
How about the platforms switch to concrete for any station built after 1950? This is more realistic, avoids any interface problems.
Ouu look! St. Catharines. Nice work OZ.
*new thought*
How about the platforms switch to concrete for any station built after 1950? This is more realistic, avoids any interface problems.
Ouu look! St. Catharines. Nice work OZ.
No, you don't. We are already half way there. We've the bare platforms. You'll need to duplicate those for other surfaces (ignore the fence, we have that already, see the buffers). Then with the Lights, Benches and Crosswalks you simply remove the ground (crosswalks would just have the timber boards and on a seperate sprite the lights). This way we end up with fewer sprites any way.lifeblood wrote:Interesting. I'm not opposed to it what so ever. The problem is that I'd have to make buffers and full tiles for each platform surface.
Now, with the buffers ... I haven't done anything yet for the very same reason. I need to know when and where to add the features : fence, entry/exit steps; i.e. corner, middle buffers
But we could simply use the platform sprites plus a filler (in all surfaces) to cover the track; then you only need one set of buffer stops, fences, light post and entry/exit step.
And of course repeat that for the snowy version, you would not need a seperate sprite for light posts and benches etc though.
Why not.... How about the platforms switch to concrete for any station built after 1950? This is more realistic, avoids any interface problems.
Yes, came out really nice, you can place it anywhere you like even at the end of a terminus station (sorry no buffer stops as yet).Ouu look! St. Catharines ...
Oh! Michael! Stop teasing us with those screenies!Not really insane. I do it myself, e.g. here:
Atleast my idea is feasible then .
And St. Catharines looks nice, I think I prefer the first shot of it allongside the tracks then at the end of a terminus. I'll have to have a good solid play with this when it's released .
Currently working under the name 'reldred' on Github, and Discord.
NFO/NML coder, part-time patch writer for JGRPP, and all round belligerent.
14:40 <orudge> I can't say I discriminate against any particular user
14:41 <Aegir> orudge: I can!
NFO/NML coder, part-time patch writer for JGRPP, and all round belligerent.
14:40 <orudge> I can't say I discriminate against any particular user
14:41 <Aegir> orudge: I can!
A-ha. I see what you mean - each element is its own sprite placed over a ground sprite. Can you send me the working sprite set that for the set just so I get a better idea of how you're doing things, and how I should be doing things?OzTransLtd wrote:No, you don't. We are already half way there. We've the bare platforms. You'll need to duplicate those for other surfaces (ignore the fence, we have that already, see the buffers). Then with the Lights, Benches and Crosswalks you simply remove the ground (crosswalks would just have the timber boards and on a seperate sprite the lights). This way we end up with fewer sprites any way.
The problem with the concrete platforms is that the current fence and lights blend right in (see image below). If we're to do this option, I'd need to make these elements much darker. Is there a way we can do this at a later date so we can focus on the initial project?
As for the buffers, is it enough to say use MB's as a guide? (ie, the location of the stairs and fences)
- Attachments
-
- platforms by cornelius
- concrete.png (7.73 KiB) Viewed 9947 times
I don't think that looks too bad lifeblood, on my screen here, the fence, lightposts and platforms are quite distinguishable.
Currently working under the name 'reldred' on Github, and Discord.
NFO/NML coder, part-time patch writer for JGRPP, and all round belligerent.
14:40 <orudge> I can't say I discriminate against any particular user
14:41 <Aegir> orudge: I can!
NFO/NML coder, part-time patch writer for JGRPP, and all round belligerent.
14:40 <orudge> I can't say I discriminate against any particular user
14:41 <Aegir> orudge: I can!
Well, MB's are distinctly European. We need something like a Hayes bumper (Below)or similar. Looking good Oztrans and Lifeblood St. Catherines is a sweet little station.
- Attachments
-
- Hayes style track bumper
- Bumper.jpg (70.83 KiB) Viewed 9868 times
Regards,
Dan MacKellar
================
Projects in Progress
North American Renewal Train Set Topic,Canadian Train Set Website, Canadian Train Set Development Topic, Finnish Train Set Website,Visit my Train Gifs Site
CN Boxcar drawn by Dave Hersrud
Dan MacKellar
================
Projects in Progress
North American Renewal Train Set Topic,Canadian Train Set Website, Canadian Train Set Development Topic, Finnish Train Set Website,Visit my Train Gifs Site
CN Boxcar drawn by Dave Hersrud
Shall do; I'll add the snowy version of St.Catharines first, as well as Locust Hill and then redo the basic platform just with fence and lights (I do have the parts for that).lifeblood wrote:Can you send me the working sprite set that for the set just so I get a better idea of how you're doing things, and how I should be doing things?
Drawing the bumbers was the hardest part for me. I opted for concrete slabs. The trick is getting something that will work with both narrow and standard gauges. Perhaps for the 1950s onward concrete platforms I'll try to do the Hayes.DanMacK wrote:Well, MB's are distinctly European. We need something like a Hayes bumper (Below)or similar. Looking good Oztrans and Lifeblood St. Catherines is a sweet little station.
Looks nice but one thing with the snowy roof, it's hard to see where the roof ends and the ground starts. Or maybe it's just my monitor.
In order to protect the visitors of this site,
TTO Full Conversion!
This post has been lol 1337 times.
you are right, but then snow is snow whether it lays on the ground or is on a roof. There is of course the roof angle to be considered and on my monitor just a touch of difference is noticeable. But, lifeblood is going to fix the roof anyway as it contains 'pure' white.Jezulkim wrote: ... but one thing with the snowy roof, it's hard to see where the roof ends and the ground starts. ...
Further, just in case someone has noticed, single platform stations are now properly fenced ... but we'll still need someone to clear the snow just outside the station building (platform side).
Ouu, very good point. Is there a way to code that in? (For stations, buffers and tiles?) In lieu of a response, I'll make them and send them to you.OzTransLtd wrote: ... but we'll still need someone to clear the snow just outside the station building (platform side).
*edit*
Here they are. They won't need lights because the stations all have lights on them.
- Attachments
-
- partial snow.png (2.71 KiB) Viewed 9637 times
Actually, I did some checking, and the white on the roof of the stations (I used the same colour scheme for all snowed roofs) is no brighter than the bright patches on snowy tiles. As well, it is the white that Michael Blunck uses on his snowy stations. I'm leaning towards not changing it. If I made it a shade darker it would really blend into the backgrond.OzTransLtd wrote:But, lifeblood is going to fix the roof anyway as it contains 'pure' white.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 80 guests