Transport Tycoon Forums

The place to talk about Transport Tycoon
It is currently Fri May 25, 2018 4:34 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 1689 posts ]  Go to page Previous 181 82 83 84 85 Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu May 17, 2018 12:00 am 
Offline
Engineer
Engineer
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2017 8:11 pm
Posts: 25
Okay, following up on that, It appears (via BBC news) the new franchise is to be called London North Eatern Railway.

So maybe they are going to do something in Apple Green (bleh) or Garter Blue (better). All that seems to exist at the moment is this logo on Wikipedia (damn that was fast) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_No ... ng_company)

http://www.lnerailway.co.uk/

_________________
Image

"Why don't we just load her up like one of those little horses?"


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu May 17, 2018 1:41 am 
Offline
Tycoon
Tycoon
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 7:31 pm
Posts: 6284
Location: Wakefield, West Yorkshire
The current plan is to nationalise it until 2020, where they hand it out to tender back into privatisation. So they might not even bother to do a proper livery to save costs, and just remove the Virgin Trains logo, and replace it with the LNER one, keeping the current coloring scheme of the livery.

_________________
Image
Worst Behaved IRC Member of 2008, 2009 & 2010 - Go Me!


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu May 17, 2018 4:41 am 
Offline
Tycoon
Tycoon
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2012 11:10 am
Posts: 3442
Location: West Java
Interesting that you guys managed to nationalize the TOCs while the trees are still in power.

Get the roses in and perhaps it'll be permanent ?

_________________
Officially "away" somewhere for years !

YNM = yoursNotMine - Don't get it ?


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu May 17, 2018 7:42 am 
Offline
General Forums Moderator
General Forums Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 3:48 pm
Posts: 7344
Location: Manchester
Arch9enius wrote:
If we find out Chris Grayling or one of his chums owns Hornby, we can assume he's done it so they can make ££££s selling a bunch of class 43s / 91s etc. with new stripes on 'em....

I find the odds of that very, very unlikely somehow...

Arch9enius wrote:
Well the LNER was the least rich of the big four apparently... Maybe something to do with a lack of population in the areas it served?

Ah yes, the East Coast Mainline serves those tiny places like Leeds, Newcastle and Edinburgh :P Whilst they're not exactly the biggest cities in the world, they ain't exactly the smallest. Especially when the Leeds/West Yorks urban area for example serves 1.7 million people - The Midland Mainline serves smaller population centres, and EMT are doing fairly okay.

YNM wrote:
Interesting that you guys managed to nationalize the TOCs while the trees are still in power.

The East Coast ran as a nationalised railway from 2009 to 2015, which includes 5 years of Tory Government (2010-2015), where they were happy to let the nationalised railway continue. The East Coast had to be nationalised here, VTEC couldn't hit their financial obligations, which probably upset the DfT somewhat, and was causing both Stagecoach and Virgin to take losses on the service.

YNM wrote:
Get the roses in and perhaps it'll be permanent ?

No thanks, give me a semi-privatised railway (which is basically what we have) any day. NR can continue to own the tracks for me too, because we all saw what happened when we tried to privatise those.


The funniest thing I find about this whole East Coast farce is the amount of money that VTEC must have spent on marketing material for the "Azumas", and now they will never operate one in passenger service. I hope that the new franchise will drop the stupid name however.

_________________
POTM August 2012 Joint Winner
My Screenshot Thread

Image


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu May 17, 2018 8:00 am 
Offline
Tycoon
Tycoon
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2012 11:10 am
Posts: 3442
Location: West Java
Pilot wrote:
YNM wrote:
Get the roses in and perhaps it'll be permanent ?

No thanks, give me a semi-privatised railway (which is basically what we have) any day. NR can continue to own the tracks for me too, because we all saw what happened when we tried to privatise those.

Well, it is expensive to run an old relic in more than tip-top shape.

_________________
Officially "away" somewhere for years !

YNM = yoursNotMine - Don't get it ?


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri May 18, 2018 7:35 am 
Offline
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2005 8:19 pm
Posts: 17095
Location: Harringay, North London
No, it’s nothing to do with expense, it’s everything to do with safety culture of such companies run by charlatan money grabbing executives cutting corners at every turn.

I don’t want another Hatfield, Potters Bar, etc etc.

_________________
Albion: A fictional Britain

Official TT-Dave Fan Club
Dave's Screenshot Thread! - Flickr


Why be a song when you can be a symphony? r is a...


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri May 18, 2018 8:57 am 
Offline
Tycoon
Tycoon
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2012 11:10 am
Posts: 3442
Location: West Java
Dave wrote:
I don’t want another Hatfield, Potters Bar, etc etc.

Do a whole network ATO then, like in Japan.

EDIT : ... Yeah except for those you mentioned. Forgot those are flagship permanent way issues.

_________________
Officially "away" somewhere for years !

YNM = yoursNotMine - Don't get it ?


Last edited by YNM on Fri May 18, 2018 5:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
   
PostPosted: Fri May 18, 2018 9:45 am 
Offline
Director
Director
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:52 pm
Posts: 558
Location: London (South West)
Code:
Thinks about potter's bar for a single second

And ATO would help how exactly?


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri May 18, 2018 11:03 am 
Offline
Tycoon
Tycoon
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2012 11:10 am
Posts: 3442
Location: West Java
Gwyd wrote:
Code:
Thinks about potter's bar for a single second

And ATO would help how exactly?

That's where "running an old relic is expensive" comes in. Especially one that's been neglected for decades.

_________________
Officially "away" somewhere for years !

YNM = yoursNotMine - Don't get it ?


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri May 18, 2018 2:27 pm 
Offline
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 10:06 am
Posts: 6168
Skype: Safir_Geo_Ghost
Location: Hertfordshire
YNM wrote:
Dave wrote:
I don’t want another Hatfield, Potters Bar, etc etc.

Do a whole network ATO then, like in Japan.


Japan isn't all ATO, and secondly ATO is not all that reliable in the first place here.

Hatfield and Potters Bar occurred due to extremely poor maintenance procedures and cost-cutting by a private infrastructure operator. Both could have been prevented, Potters Bar was so very nearly prevented and equally only a couple minutes away from being far far worse.
In the aftermath of the Hatfield crash, it was an absolute shock to find that there were hundreds more similar instances waiting to happen all over the country.

ATO has absolutely no bearing on this whole thing.

_________________
My Photography - YouTube


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri May 18, 2018 3:43 pm 
Offline
Tycoon
Tycoon
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 7:31 pm
Posts: 6284
Location: Wakefield, West Yorkshire
Geo Ghost wrote:
Hatfield and Potters Bar occurred due to extremely poor maintenance procedures and cost-cutting by a private infrastructure operator. Both could have been prevented, Potters Bar was so very nearly prevented and equally only a couple minutes away from being far far worse.
In the aftermath of the Hatfield crash, it was an absolute shock to find that there were hundreds more similar instances waiting to happen all over the country.
Was the Grayrigg crash caused by the same reasons of poor maintenance?

It seems TransPennine Express, Northern, Greater Anglia & South Western Railway are also struggling to keep up their payments - The Guardian.
Are there more rescue renationalisations coming up perhaps?

SWR & TPE are both operated by FirstGroup - so they might not like having two potentially mucking up franchises.

_________________
Image
Worst Behaved IRC Member of 2008, 2009 & 2010 - Go Me!


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri May 18, 2018 5:24 pm 
Offline
Tycoon
Tycoon
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2012 11:10 am
Posts: 3442
Location: West Java
Geo Ghost wrote:
Hatfield and Potters Bar occurred due to extremely poor maintenance procedures and cost-cutting by a private infrastructure operator.
...

ATO has absolutely no bearing on this whole thing.

Yeah, indeed. Most crashes are thanks to SPAD or level crossings or alike.

But perhaps while doing it they'd get a hold of how bad the tracks are XD

_________________
Officially "away" somewhere for years !

YNM = yoursNotMine - Don't get it ?


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri May 18, 2018 5:54 pm 
Offline
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 10:06 am
Posts: 6168
Skype: Safir_Geo_Ghost
Location: Hertfordshire
YNM wrote:
Geo Ghost wrote:
Hatfield and Potters Bar occurred due to extremely poor maintenance procedures and cost-cutting by a private infrastructure operator.
...

ATO has absolutely no bearing on this whole thing.

Yeah, indeed. Most crashes are thanks to SPAD or level crossings or alike.


ATO still doesn't get rid of SPAD's. An ATO train can still have a SPAD (although I'd like to know if the train gets med-screened instead..)

Most crashes aren't 'thanks to SPADs' anyway. There is a varying degree of causes. Whilst some are due to a SPAD, there's still a great many that aren't.
Ones with fatalities (excluding level crossings) for example in recent decades:
Croydon Tramlink (overspeed derailment) Grarigg (points), Potters Bar (points), Great Heck (vehicle + oncoming train collision), Hatfield (rail defect), and so fourth. That's just to name a select few and there are of course plenty of incidents where there were just injuries.
Ladbroke Grove in 1999 was the last incident with loss of life caused by a SPAD, plus Southall 2 years earlier. Of course both were preventable with Ladbroke Grove having better signal sighting for that particular signal plus TPWS/ATP being implemented, and likewise with Southall again with not only TPWS/ATP being implemented but also the train in question not running as it was with the AWS isolated on-board.

Level crossings do unfortunately not account for a quite a high number of incidents, but that's almost always outside railway control.
The main reason we don't see any major incidents these days is because of a much stronger and more robust safety culture.

_________________
My Photography - YouTube


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri May 18, 2018 6:02 pm 
Offline
Tycoon
Tycoon
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2012 11:10 am
Posts: 3442
Location: West Java
Geo Ghost wrote:
The main reason we don't see any major incidents these days is because of a much stronger and more robust safety culture.

True that ! I'm following NR's weekly update videos, where everything is interesting XD

_________________
Officially "away" somewhere for years !

YNM = yoursNotMine - Don't get it ?


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri May 18, 2018 7:24 pm 
Offline
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 10:06 am
Posts: 6168
Skype: Safir_Geo_Ghost
Location: Hertfordshire
Aye true!
I watch a lot of the RED videos myself. Great for information and thinking, especially with their safety/incident reconstructions.

Sadly the older ones aren't fully accessible yet for us which is a bit annoying. One day hopefully!

_________________
My Photography - YouTube


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri May 18, 2018 8:56 pm 
Offline
Tycoon
Tycoon
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:36 pm
Posts: 1985
Location: Leeds, UK
Redirect Left wrote:
With the failure rate of this route, is it due to the Department for Transport giving inflated or overly optimistic figures in the invitation to tender, or is it genuinely the TOCs promising way too much?

I believe passenger numbers have just started falling for the first time in decades. I would expect more failures to come, as most bids are based on increasing passenger demand

_________________
Screenshots

Formerly Class 165


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri May 18, 2018 11:09 pm 
Offline
Tycoon
Tycoon
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 7:31 pm
Posts: 6284
Location: Wakefield, West Yorkshire
Chris wrote:
Redirect Left wrote:
With the failure rate of this route, is it due to the Department for Transport giving inflated or overly optimistic figures in the invitation to tender, or is it genuinely the TOCs promising way too much?

I believe passenger numbers have just started falling for the first time in decades. I would expect more failures to come, as most bids are based on increasing passenger demand
The constant strikes some TOCs are facing are probably not helping either, and I'm pretty sure the DfT and TOCs would have known what to expect if they went ahead and tried to cut down on conductors hours, getting rid of them entirely, or repurposing their job.

_________________
Image
Worst Behaved IRC Member of 2008, 2009 & 2010 - Go Me!


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat May 19, 2018 10:41 am 
Offline
Tycoon
Tycoon
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2012 11:10 am
Posts: 3442
Location: West Java
Chris wrote:
I believe passenger numbers have just started falling for the first time in decades.

Interesting... Is it really because travel overall is falling ?

_________________
Officially "away" somewhere for years !

YNM = yoursNotMine - Don't get it ?


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun May 20, 2018 3:19 pm 
Offline
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 10:06 am
Posts: 6168
Skype: Safir_Geo_Ghost
Location: Hertfordshire
Please excuse me whilst I recover from laughing.. :mrgreen:

Major cancellations across GTR services on first day of new timetable.

All I can say is "Called it!"

_________________
My Photography - YouTube


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun May 20, 2018 7:42 pm 
Offline
Tycoon
Tycoon
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 7:31 pm
Posts: 6284
Location: Wakefield, West Yorkshire
Yep. Not only has this peeved off the majority of rail users, it's proven hard for even the TOCs to implement without error. I wonder if they'll get it solved during the week, or if this is something that'll keep going...

Today, my journey home from York took an extra 30 minutes. Do you know how much I paid for the old timetable £10.10. Do you know how much I paid today for the new improved timetable that is actually very inconvenient? £10.55.
Yup. I am paying more, and getting a lot less convenience. oh how i wish i was joking

_________________
Image
Worst Behaved IRC Member of 2008, 2009 & 2010 - Go Me!


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 1689 posts ]  Go to page Previous 181 82 83 84 85 Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000-2018 phpBB Limited

Copyright © Owen Rudge/The Transport Tycoon Forums 2001-2018.
Hosted by Zernebok Hosting.