UK Renewal Set - v3 1st of August 2006
Moderator: Graphics Moderators
- White Rabbit
- Tycoon
- Posts: 1734
- Joined: 22 Jun 2005 19:15
- Born Acorn
- Tycoon
- Posts: 7595
- Joined: 10 Dec 2002 20:36
- Skype: bornacorn
- Location: Wrexham, Wales
- Contact:
Yes, many of the locos share sounds. There are *counts* 9 whistle/horn sounds and 11 engine sound sets in total.White Rabbit wrote:(e.g. many of the early steam locomotives have identical sounds, while the Pacific and the late freight steamers are unique).
The Wardale locos' horn was really bad before the 2.0 release, they're toned down (no pun intended) a bit now...Born Acorn wrote:Are they meant to be like that or did they get electronically mangled?
Love the futuristic stuff, Pikka. Marvelous work.
Currently working under the name 'reldred' on Github, and Discord.
NFO/NML coder, part-time patch writer for JGRPP, and all round belligerent.
14:40 <orudge> I can't say I discriminate against any particular user
14:41 <Aegir> orudge: I can!
NFO/NML coder, part-time patch writer for JGRPP, and all round belligerent.
14:40 <orudge> I can't say I discriminate against any particular user
14:41 <Aegir> orudge: I can!
Re: UK Renewal Set - v2.0 30th of January
1. Nice new site. Nice new toys to play with. Sweet.PikkaBird wrote:Feedback, as always, is welcome.
2. Now, again I'd like to request that you consider tweaking passenger and mail loading speeds in the later vehicle overrides? Maybe it's just in my games, but the default spped loading ends up meaning passenger trains often spending as much time in the station as travelling, having to "over"-build stations with additional platforms to hold those waiting trains, and in some cases, an acknowledgement that for all the additional 'infrastructure' I can possibly squeeze in, towns will generate passengers and mail faster than I can load 'em.
3. New sounds. The horns and whatnot are really ugly sounds, yet they work really well, and I like them a lot. The running sounds I like a whole lot less. The steam sounds themselves are quite good, but the implementation doesn't quite work. I guess this is a limitation of what the new sounds code can do, but the transition from one steam sound to the next ("changing gears") is pretty crude, and after a time becomes a bit annoying. The diesel and electric sounds are fine in themselves, but after a while their humming just becomes a constant clutter in the background. I guess I'm not sold at all on the idea that constant running sounds are a desirable thing(*). Still, kudos to you for being the first to incorporate such a new and different feature so fully.
NB: With the new sounds on the "kaa-ching!" sound when money is paid on delivery disappeared completely. Intentional or some conflict?
(* Slight tangent: Will the NARS being incorporating running sounds? I think the horn, etc sounds in that set are terrific, they add a lot to the atmosphere - IMHO adding running sounds will make using those newsounds less desirable.)
I did wonder that. It's just an on/off switch at them moment isn't it? If the newsounds switch can itself determine which sounds are which type (by manner of what bit of code is being called), perhaps the newsounds switch can be tweaked to use the user-passed parameters for which sounds are played, rather than it being done individually by each grf creator?
I dunno how it works, but, yeah that's a good idea khamura.
I dunno how it works, but, yeah that's a good idea khamura.
-
- Tycoon
- Posts: 5948
- Joined: 27 Apr 2005 07:09
- Contact:
Well, I did test the patch´s "running sounds" feature during the DB Set update process towards v0.9 quite a lot, both in DOS and Windows, but - as HaraldV states - I do have the same problems with them: both in implementation restrictions and in longterm psychological results.
(Note however that I didn´t test out Pikkas .grf yet. Nevertheless, I think the problems would be the same.)
In conclusion, I´ve decided to skip running sounds but restrict to all the other sound possibilities.
Although the idea to support user sound customization would be a good idea at all, I don´t think it´s a good solution with regards to the first problem (implementation restrictions).
regards
Michael
(Note however that I didn´t test out Pikkas .grf yet. Nevertheless, I think the problems would be the same.)
In conclusion, I´ve decided to skip running sounds but restrict to all the other sound possibilities.
Although the idea to support user sound customization would be a good idea at all, I don´t think it´s a good solution with regards to the first problem (implementation restrictions).
regards
Michael
They can, and I am considering doing this...khamura wrote:Hmmm. Perhaps relatedly, but can newsounds in a grf be triggered by parameters? That way there'd be a solution for everyone. (Except for poor pikka, who would have to code it. )
BTW, if you find the sounds are becoming annoying, you may have the volume up too loud. I deliberately intended the running sounds for the trains to be quiet, and in fact the most annoying thing for me as far as the sounds go in TTD at the moment is the road vehicle startups.
I like vehicle running sounds, but theres still something missing, mainly the click-clack sound when a wheel hits a spot in the tracks where theres a small gap..
Is it possible to make that sound only play every two wagons, i.e Wagon 1 makes click clack sound, then next one to make it is wagon 3 and so on?
Is it possible to make that sound only play every two wagons, i.e Wagon 1 makes click clack sound, then next one to make it is wagon 3 and so on?
There's a relatively simple implementation suggested on the wiki.michael blunck wrote:Although the idea to support user sound customization would be a good idea at all, I don´t think it´s a good solution with regards to the first problem (implementation restrictions)
One sounds GRF, and a separate train GRF that imports the sounds from the sound GRF. Users who want sounds download and add both, users that don't only download the trains GRF. This is one of the few times where I consider multiple GRF files for a single project to be acceptable.
To get a good answer, ask a Smart Question. Similarly, if you want a bug fixed, write a Useful Bug Report. No TTDPatch crashlog? Then follow directions.
Projects: NFORenum (download) | PlaneSet (Website) | grfcodec (download) | grfdebug.log parser
Projects: NFORenum (download) | PlaneSet (Website) | grfcodec (download) | grfdebug.log parser
I don't know what you mean by "with regards to the first problem", but it's not difficult at all to add the grf parameter to disable running sounds. After all, there are already a lot of "implementation restrictions" in there (eg, it doesn't play the sounds in tunnels, when broken down, or for AI trains).michael blunck wrote:Although the idea to support user sound customization would be a good idea at all, I don´t think it´s a good solution with regards to the first problem (implementation restrictions).
- khamura
- Traffic Manager
- Posts: 218
- Joined: 27 May 2005 21:50
- Location: Tourian, Planet Zebes, Orion Arm, Milky Way
- Contact:
Is it intended for the Gemini monorail engine to become available three times? Right now, the first one is available from 2021 for 40 passengers, the next in 2035 for 30 mail, the last in 2037 for 40 goods. Also, the Taurus is designed in 1928.
- Attachments
-
- SCR31.png (29.1 KiB) Viewed 5708 times
Graduate of the LeRoy Funkified Badass School of Soul
- khamura
- Traffic Manager
- Posts: 218
- Joined: 27 May 2005 21:50
- Location: Tourian, Planet Zebes, Orion Arm, Milky Way
- Contact:
Hrm. Yes, I suppose it could be GRF conflicts, but I'm not sure which combination is responsible for this mess. I certainly didn't change my setup, only updated the UKRS.peter1138 wrote:khamura, you might wish to disable the conflicting set... For me the Geminis appear in 2015 and the Taurus in 2019, though the Taurus container wagon appears a couple of years later.
Oh well. I shall experiment...
Graduate of the LeRoy Funkified Badass School of Soul
- khamura
- Traffic Manager
- Posts: 218
- Joined: 27 May 2005 21:50
- Location: Tourian, Planet Zebes, Orion Arm, Milky Way
- Contact:
Curiouser and curiouser. Can a set have conflicts with another even though that other set isn't loaded? That is to say, is red in the New Graphics window? I have the DBSet, USSet and CanSet, but disabled them in order to play with the UKRS.
ETA: I tried editing them out of my newgrfs completely, yet the problem persists. Here's my config.
ETA: I tried editing them out of my newgrfs completely, yet the problem persists. Here's my config.
- Attachments
-
- newgrfw.cfg
- (829 Bytes) Downloaded 215 times
Graduate of the LeRoy Funkified Badass School of Soul
Actually, it's not necessarily a grf conflict, it could just be that if you're running a game you started with the older ukrs, it hasn't updated the vehicle data. Try doing a cht:resetvehicles.khamura wrote:Curiouser and curiouser. Can a set have conflicts with another even though that other set isn't loaded?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests