GoneWacko wrote:They're the testing grounds, surely it's not open for public
"Demonstration Service
The test operation includes the opportunity of joining several passenger runs for visitors.
Prices for a visit to the TVE including Transrapid trip:
Adults: € 18,-
Children up to 6 years: free
Children 6 to 16 years: € 6,-
Schoolchildren/students/trainees over 16 years
with ID card/proof of eligibility: € 9,-
Visits to the exhibitions and the Transrapid cinema are free."
http://www.transrapid.de/en/tve/tve_besucher.html
(
http://www.transrapid.de/en/index.html -> TVE -> Visitor)
---------------------------------
Edit:
There are some severe disadvantages of MagLevs, e.g. the TransRapid.
1. Its extraordinary high investment costs.
2. Its incompatibility with existing railway systems.
Everything from track to stations has to be rebuilt. In most city centers, it´ll be impossible to place extra TR stations. Instead there are plans to built TR stations outside city centers (e.g. outside Berlin (Westkreuz)) which results to longer travel times (transfer to and use of underground to city center, in the case of Berlin to Lehrter Bahnhof).
3. modern high-speed railway systems (TGV, ICE) are offering almost as high velocities for a much lesser cost.
Main disadvantage of the TR is its high energy consumption. Only to get 1 ton levitated (with zero speed!) you´ll need an energy of 1.13 kW. With that same energy, an ICE will get already to a speed of 120 km/h.
A related problem is air resistance which is growing to the second (~ v^2) and decisively depends on the cross-section resp. front surface of a vehicle. TRs would typically consist of less coaches than a TGV or ICE and consequently suffer from a higher air resistance with respect to number of passengers transported.
The reason for shorter TRs being the high currents needed to accelerate a TR. Because every TR coach implements the (linear) motor, the needed current grows with the number of coaches, i.e. to accelerate a 10-coach TR from 490 km/h to 500 km/, a power of 80 MW is needed. This would be sufficient for 8 ICEs to accelerate from 0 km/s to max speed.
In conclusion, speeds above 300 km/h lead to an under-proportional reduction of travel time and an over-proportional consumption of energy compared to conventional high-speed railways.
regards
Michael