Page 2 of 4

Posted: 22 Apr 2004 10:03
by ThorRune
Darn PC... No leftclicking

But i love the dominik idea! :D

Posted: 22 Apr 2004 10:08
by Purno
I like Dominiks idea but I don't think a seaplane needs a 'runway' because it can land everywhere at the water. It should land whenever nearby the dock, in every direction.

EDIT: BTW: Can't a seaplane use a ship depot?

Posted: 22 Apr 2004 10:18
by Hyronymus
Aren't sea planes built on land, meaning their maiden trip starts on land? My suggestion is to use normal plane hangars to built (and service) them. Just allow them to use docks as loading areas too.

Posted: 22 Apr 2004 10:23
by Purno
Hyronymus wrote:Aren't sea planes built on land, meaning their maiden trip starts on land? My suggestion is to use normal plane hangars to built (and service) them. Just allow them to use docks as loading areas too.
If a seaplane is built on land, how do you trainsport it into sea or air. It can't take off on land, and it can't drive into water. So you'll need a water-depot.

Posted: 22 Apr 2004 10:27
by mispunt
Purno wrote:It can't take off on land, and it can't drive into water. So you'll need a water-depot.
Some planes also have wheels to take-off and land on normal airfields.
The wheels are "inflateble"(is this the correct wordt for that?) so they won't be wet when the plane is landing on water.

Posted: 22 Apr 2004 10:29
by Purno
So it can take off at normal airports too?

Posted: 22 Apr 2004 10:29
by Hyronymus
mispunt wrote:Some planes also have wheels to take-off and land on normal airfields.
The wheels are "inflateble"(is this the correct wordt for that?) so they won't be wet when the plane is landing on water.
He's soooo right.

Posted: 22 Apr 2004 10:31
by GoneWacko
dominik81 wrote:This is what I think a seaport should be look like. After all it's supposed to be for small areas and most of the time you don't have long costal streches. Therefore this one uses just 3 costal tiles.
I think the dock should be optional... (Build a dock there and voila, you've got the dock back)

Posted: 22 Apr 2004 10:36
by Purno
I think the seaplane should use a normal dock (maybe the dock needs some graphical modifications anyway).

Maybe you can add a traffic control tower, but I think that's only for big docks.



EDIT: I think it should work this way: A seaplane comes flying to a dock. He lands nearby the dock and then floats to the dock to (un)load.

Posted: 22 Apr 2004 10:41
by dominik81
I don't think that seaplanes have wheels. I was more thinking about the famous Talespin seaplane "Sea Duck", picture attached.

Posted: 22 Apr 2004 10:42
by Hyronymus
Very sensible. No marks needed in the water. But now what to do with multiple planes at one dock?

PS: my contributions to OTTD will just be on the thinking-along spectrum.

Posted: 22 Apr 2004 11:13
by mispunt
dominik81 wrote:I don't think that seaplanes have wheels. I was more thinking about the famous Talespin seaplane "Sea Duck", picture attached.
see this: http://www.menet.umn.edu/~mlr/pix-html/ ... talina.jpg
So some planes do haev wheels other don't, so it should be possible to make seaplanes who could use normal airports and hangars as well as docks. and other who couuld only use docks.

Posted: 22 Apr 2004 11:17
by Purno
What about GTA Vice City's Skimmer

Image

Posted: 22 Apr 2004 11:27
by GoneWacko
Purno wrote:What about GTA Vice City's Skimmer
Protected...
http://gta.ag.ru/i/vc/cars/skimmers.jpg

Posted: 22 Apr 2004 11:34
by Purno
GoneWacko wrote:Protected...
What do you mean?

Posted: 22 Apr 2004 11:58
by fabca2
Seaplane are a good idea, but please make the runing cost enough high..

otherwise there are no need to have boat, aierplane anymore ! :(
instead of building canals, you will build a small airport, target your seaplane to use the airport... it will be faster..

I think we must think about some disavantages (lower reliability, slower than real aireplane, smaller cargo, high runing cost)

for information the advantages are : can land everywhere in sea (plane don't)
faster than boats, can use airport (boat don't.. really!), see the sky to move to take the quickest "road" to destination (boat need to move around obstacles sometimes)... which is enough I think.

don't you ?

Posted: 22 Apr 2004 12:14
by Purno
I think seaplanes should absolutely have smaller capacity than ships.

Posted: 22 Apr 2004 12:16
by mispunt
I second that, because when they don't have less capacity they should be very, very large...

Posted: 22 Apr 2004 12:24
by Purno
like a Boeing 747, which can land on the water. :wink:

Posted: 22 Apr 2004 12:29
by mispunt
he probably could land on water, but could he go up again?