![Pleased :]](./images/smilies/pleased.gif)
*coughs*
So... What was it again?

Moderator: General Forums Moderators
I don't know, but I think that the spoken "okay" has always been written "okay" as well as "O.K.", long before any chatspeak or internet forums have been established.AndersI wrote:And what was OK when it first surfaced?aahz77 wrote:I agree with you. But there is a difference between a language evolving and using chatspeak abbreviations
I doubt the word derived that way. Why should someone add a "p" before "owned"?! I think someone mistyped the "o" and hit the "p" (neighbors on the keyboard!) and then it spread out.Illegal_Alien wrote:P W N E D = POWNED = Owned
Especially when a given abbreviation or slang term is only used within certain person subgroups. See my previous posts as I haven't heard about or read the term "p wned" before.athanasios wrote:Take into consideration that English is not the mother language of all the members of this forum. So such abbreviations can be very confusing for them.
*Looks at username*DaleStan wrote:There are many such words/"words".[1] Each community defines which ones are and aren't acceptable. This particular community sticks pretty closely to the dictionary.
[1] Cow-orker, cop-rogrammer, luser[2], pwn et al, gamez/warez/hax and their ilk, grilf, &c.
[2] OK, this isn't quite fair; it's more properly a conglomeration of "loser" and "user".
As DaleStan explained, the "w hit" thing was because good ol' Zetor2003, as he was then, constantly misspelled "with", as well as various other words. It drove a number of us up the wall, me especially, so I added it to the word filter. It did eventually do the trick.Railwaymodeler wrote:There are swear words on the list, I think, that must be British swear words, and not in America. This w h i t thing, for example. Never heard that term, but it sounds like something from a lawyer's dictionary.
I believe it was a dummy spit and storm off.Dave Worley wrote:Isn't he now banned?
That sounds so much more satisfying than a ban.Raichase wrote:I believe it was a dummy spit and storm off.Dave Worley wrote:Isn't he now banned?
Depends on the level of huff, and dummy spit. Especially if said spit involves insulting people on the way out followed by "say what you will I won't read it". If someone feels wronged, and they just have a fuss and leave, they can usually come back from that.DaleStan wrote:I still like that suggestion (Owen's idea, I believe) that storming off in a huff be a bannable offense.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests