Transport Tycoon Forums

The place to talk about Transport Tycoon
It is currently Wed Sep 26, 2018 9:48 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: FIRS Cargo Labels
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 8:56 am 
Offline
Tycoon
Tycoon

Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 7:09 am
Posts: 5237
andythenorth wrote:
Pulpwood (PULP) I am very dubious about, I am play-testing it and I am not sure it adds anything at all compared to plain WOOD.

Right. At first I thought you meant "wood pulp", but as real "wood" it´s redundant as already deprecated TWOD ("tropic wood", by George). It doesn´t add anything to gameplay, and should be removed from CargoTypes.

andythenorth wrote:
In theory it brings the opportunity to have dedicated bulk vehicles (woodchip hoppers/trucks) for pulp which would be inappropriate for logs.

In DBXL, "wood chips" is a sub-cargo to WDPR, to be transported in hoppers.

regards
Michael

_________________
Image


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: FIRS Cargo Labels
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 10:10 am 
Offline
Tycoon
Tycoon
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 2:23 pm
Posts: 4676
Location: Lost in Music
'Pulpwood' would make more sense if there was also a 'tree length logs' or 'prime logs' cargo or similar.

I'm not ruling that out, because I have roughly sketched-out Logging economy in mind. But for the current economies, pulpwood is pretty useless, and moreover, adding it now might be premature as it might not fit in a Logging economy either.

So I'll get rid of Pulpwood from current FIRS repo, thanks. Deleting is fun. 8)

_________________
FIRS Industry Replacement Set (Released) | HEQS Heavy Equipment Set (trucks, industrial trams and more) (Finished)
Squid Ate FISH (ships) (Released) | CHIPS Has Improved Players' Stations (Finished)
Iron Horse (trains, released) | Termite (tracks for Iron Horse, released) | Busy Bee (game script, released)

Road Hog (road vehicles, released)


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: FIRS Cargo Labels
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 11:24 am 
Offline
Tycoon
Tycoon

Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 7:09 am
Posts: 5237
andythenorth wrote:
So I'll get rid of Pulpwood from current FIRS repo, thanks.

Should also be removed from the list then.

There are some other quirks with that list (e.g. MAIZ is used also outside tropic climate, some classes seem to be incorrect, the table is broken, etc).

Since I seem to be banned from newgrf-specs.tt-wiki.net I can´t change it myself.

andythenorth wrote:
Deleting is fun. :cool:

Want more (less)?

regards
Michael

_________________
Image


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: FIRS Cargo Labels
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 11:27 am 
Offline
Tycoon
Tycoon
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 2:23 pm
Posts: 4676
Location: Lost in Music
michael blunck wrote:
Since I seem to be banned from newgrf-specs.tt-wiki.net I can´t change it myself.

I am also locked out of the newgrf wiki, hence this thread. :twisted:

_________________
FIRS Industry Replacement Set (Released) | HEQS Heavy Equipment Set (trucks, industrial trams and more) (Finished)
Squid Ate FISH (ships) (Released) | CHIPS Has Improved Players' Stations (Finished)
Iron Horse (trains, released) | Termite (tracks for Iron Horse, released) | Busy Bee (game script, released)

Road Hog (road vehicles, released)


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: FIRS Cargo Labels
PostPosted: Sat Jan 06, 2018 8:09 am 
Offline
Tycoon
Tycoon
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 2:23 pm
Posts: 4676
Location: Lost in Music
michael blunck wrote:
Since I seem to be banned from newgrf-specs.tt-wiki.net I can´t change it myself.

Something has changed on the newgrf wiki, looks like a software upgrade.

I couldn't get in with my previous creds, but I did a password reset and I can now log in and edit ;)

_________________
FIRS Industry Replacement Set (Released) | HEQS Heavy Equipment Set (trucks, industrial trams and more) (Finished)
Squid Ate FISH (ships) (Released) | CHIPS Has Improved Players' Stations (Finished)
Iron Horse (trains, released) | Termite (tracks for Iron Horse, released) | Busy Bee (game script, released)

Road Hog (road vehicles, released)


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: FIRS Cargo Labels
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2018 8:52 pm 
Offline
Tycoon
Tycoon

Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 12:14 am
Posts: 7122
i might be a little delayed to chime in here, but
michael blunck wrote:
IIRC, "copper" is the only metal product in "basic tropic" and "in a hot country" economy, hence no collision with any other material. BTW, COPR was just an example, even more redundant labels are METL and STEL.
i think this is the wrong approach. If "metal" and "copper" are likely to have different sprites, they should very much have different cargo labels. there is no reason to minimize the total number of cargo labels across all GRFs. the only thing that achieves is that vehicle set authors must put in additional logic to determine which industry set is loaded to decide which sprite to draw, and the cargo labels was exactly meant to avoid that.
Quote:
And BTW, take a look into our mess/list of cargo labels. There are already cargoes with no equivalence to their labels, and also the meaning of specific cargoes differ between different industry sets.
and this is the direct result of the above misguided attempt at "reusing" cargo labels, and "bending" them somehow onto your cargo, instead of using new "clean" ones.

_________________
You might not exactly be interested in Ferion, but if you are, have fun :)


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: FIRS Cargo Labels
PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2018 8:13 am 
Offline
Tycoon
Tycoon

Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 7:09 am
Posts: 5237
Eddi wrote:
michael blunck wrote:
IIRC, "copper" is the only metal product in "basic tropic" and "in a hot country" economy, hence no collision with any other material. BTW, COPR was just an example, even more redundant labels are METL and STEL.

i think this is the wrong approach. If "metal" and "copper" are likely to have different sprites, they should very much have different cargo labels. there is no reason to minimize the total number of cargo labels across all GRFs. the only thing that achieves is that vehicle set authors must put in additional logic to determine which industry set is loaded to decide which sprite to draw, and the cargo labels was exactly meant to avoid that. [...]

For a "minimalistic" set, METL (or the original label STEL) would be the proper label for handling all cargoes who´d fit (probably only roughly) under that label. Without any further ado. But for a "rivet counter/foamer" vehicle set, the overhead of "additional logic" would be clearly negligible. IMO, inflation (and continuous invention and discarding) of labels is a more serious drawback.

regards
Michael

_________________
Image


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: FIRS Cargo Labels
PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2018 4:47 pm 
Offline
Tycoon
Tycoon
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 2:23 pm
Posts: 4676
Location: Lost in Music
michael blunck wrote:
IMO, inflation (and continuous invention and discarding) of labels is a more serious drawback.

I'm missing what harm it causes. As far as I can see, it's cost free. What do I miss? :roll:

_________________
FIRS Industry Replacement Set (Released) | HEQS Heavy Equipment Set (trucks, industrial trams and more) (Finished)
Squid Ate FISH (ships) (Released) | CHIPS Has Improved Players' Stations (Finished)
Iron Horse (trains, released) | Termite (tracks for Iron Horse, released) | Busy Bee (game script, released)

Road Hog (road vehicles, released)


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: FIRS Cargo Labels
PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2018 12:02 am 
Offline
Tycoon
Tycoon

Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 12:14 am
Posts: 7122
i think you're kinda missing the point why the METL cargo exists in the first place. it was never meant as a "let's lump all metals into this" cargo.

the need for a METL cargo came from there being both a steel mill and an aluminium plant, but the factory that processes them doesn't really care which one of these is delivered.

now, there would be 3 solutions for this problem:
  1. have both STEL and ALUM cargos, and handling the distinction at the input of the factory. this, however, clashes with the fairly strict limit of 3 input cargos on industries
  2. have the aluminium plant also produce STEL. here you would introduce some disconnection between the cargo label and the displayed name, which we could live with, but it also poses a problem for future extensibility, because if there ever were need for both STEL and ALUM cargos in an economy, you need to have additional logic in the industry set to define which name/translations to be used with the STEL cargo label
  3. introducing a new METL label for this "unified" cargo seemed to be the clearest approach

however, none of this has even remotely anything to do with COPR
  • there almost certainly never will be an industry that doesn't care whether it processes steel or copper
  • copper is already a base game cargo with existing name/translations
  • copper has significantly different cargo sprites, whereas steel and aluminium you kinda get away with using the same

conclusion: trying to squeeze COPR into this METL cargo makes life worse for everyone involved, with no discernable benefits

_________________
You might not exactly be interested in Ferion, but if you are, have fun :)


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: FIRS Cargo Labels
PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2018 3:12 am 
Offline
Graphics Moderator
Graphics Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 1:21 pm
Posts: 5302
Location: The Moon
Eddi wrote:
copper is already a base game cargo with existing name/translations


CORE is a base game cargo, accepted by tropic Factories and converted into goods. COPR was originally a PBI cargo.

_________________
Pikkarail.com blog | Patreon
Dev reference: NML Specs - NewGRF Specs - Savegame Internals - NoAi API - NoGo API


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: FIRS Cargo Labels
PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2018 6:38 am 
Offline
Tycoon
Tycoon

Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 12:14 am
Posts: 7122
ah, i was mixing those two up then. but it doesn't really change much of the argument. the idea behind the "mixed" cargos like METL and BDMT is this "we have these multiple cargos for which there is no gameplay distinction". you should still be as specific as posssible with the other cargos.

_________________
You might not exactly be interested in Ferion, but if you are, have fun :)


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000-2018 phpBB Limited

Copyright © Owen Rudge/The Transport Tycoon Forums 2001-2018.
Hosted by Zernebok Hosting.