Are you still going to use the original thread (this one). Shouldn't you really make different topics on different subjects (graphic development etc.) in the P1SIM forum.
Whenever I have to show something new or want to ask you something I start a new thread. If you want to discuss a special topic, feel free to start a new thread yourself. This mega thread is really not very useful for discussing special topics, since nobody wants to read the whole thread to find information about special topics.
It is one of the most intriguing (I correct myself, the most intriguing and interesting) game that I have ever come across. (...) Great work, love the art, the graphics, and the concept.
Thank you. I feel the same way
I would find it very reasonable even if I pay 30 EUR base and 10 EUR per year.
Many people told me that they don't like yearly fees. Thus there will only be one base price, which includes all future costs (updates).
I sincerely hope you stick to user-created modules
I do suppose you're allowing us to overlap modules to make more modules?
I don't think that overlapping modules will be necessary, since there will be enough types of switches and crossings. Do you have an example for me where it could be still needed?
can we implement timetabling for a daily timetable?
Yes. There will be timetables in P1SIM. They are based on a 24h system like in reality. If all 4 weekdays (P1SIM has 4 instead of 7) are the same or if there is something like a labour-free "sunday" has to be discussed.
I've started reading the pdf
Good to know its still online. I will delete it, since the pdf concepts in this thread are out-dated.
I was wondering: if you had only eight final orientations (for rail: as in, the track must be facing one of the eight directions at the module's edge), and trains had to slow down at curves, would this mean some unrealistic planning for High Speed Rail? Because the way I see it (and do it in Locomotion) is therefore to create as little turns as possible, which would lead to increased track length as a compromise for higher average speeds (per trip).
I dont get the problem. Please find attached the available radii. They are still to narrow for high speed trains, I know. Perhaps I will add even bigger ones. Not sure yet.