Concept Phase Oct09-May12

LocoMH · PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 3:40 pm

smallfly wrote:

Drury wrote:

Yeah, both plane and bus light cones should be longer definitely - like 4-5 times longer.

long (real) light cones are associated with many visual problems. thus i have to stick to small cones. for example think about light cones in road curves which overlap trees, buildings, other vehicles etc. or light cones that hit terrain slopes shortly before the vehicle reaches the slope.

Yeah, I kinda thought something like that. It's great the way it looks, too, nothing to worry about, anyways.

Pilot · PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 3:40 pm

Drury wrote:

A321Pilot wrote:

Leanden wrote:

On a separate note, your runway lacks blast pads...

Not All Runways have Blast Pads though :wink:

However, all logistics simulators should feature them.

Then Shouldn't they have Displaced Thresholds as well (the Arrows).

smallfly · PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2012 10:14 am

- Taxiway and runway widened
- Blast pads added

I read something about displaced thresholds and they are only needed when the first part of a runway is not suitable for landings (due to bad ground conditions or noise regulations). Both won't be a problem in P1SIM. And also because I do not really like the look of the displaced thresholds (they do not fit to the clean style of P1SIM) I will not implement them.

Attachment:

airport6_preview.png [ 41.69 KiB | Viewed 4534 times ]

(larger version attached)

LocoMH · PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2012 11:14 am

Does the runway have a width of 11 (9 without borders) fields now?

smallfly · PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2012 11:28 am

LocoMH wrote:

Does the runway have a width of 11 (9 without borders) fields now?

9 complete. see picture

Attachment:

grid.png [ 89.28 KiB | Viewed 4513 times ]

Pilot · PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2012 3:46 pm

smallfly wrote:

I read something about displaced thresholds and they are only needed when the first part of a runway is not suitable for landings (due to bad ground conditions or noise regulations). Both won't be a problem in P1SIM. And also because I do not really like the look of the displaced thresholds (they do not fit to the clean style of P1SIM) I will not implement them.

It was just a suggestion, however, if it looks ugly, then fine by me if you leave it out, :lol:

. Also, most Runways have displaced thresholds now, because the planes have hammered the ground under them so much.

smallfly · PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2012 3:53 pm

A321Pilot wrote:

Also, most Runways have displaced thresholds now, because the planes have hammered the ground under them so much.

P1SIM runways will be very stable

Leanden · PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2012 4:12 pm

Tbh i think it looks strange having the guide line join the runway in front of the threshold rather than at it, might it be worth doing a mock up of both and getting a vote on which looks better?

smallfly · PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2012 4:18 pm

Leanden wrote:

Tbh i think it looks strange having the guide line join the runway in front of the threshold rather than at it, might it be worth doing a mock up of both and getting a vote on which looks better?

so you want me to move the "|||| 27 ||||" a bit downwards so that the yellow guide lines curve ends shortly above the 27?

Leanden · PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2012 4:00 pm

smallfly wrote:

so you want me to move the "|||| 27 ||||" a bit downwards so that the yellow guide lines curve ends shortly above the 27?

Indeed

smallfly · PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2012 5:38 pm

Attachment:

airport9_preview.png [ 40.31 KiB | Viewed 4358 times ]

(larger version attached)

Pilot · PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2012 6:28 pm

That looks Awesome.

Well done Mate.

Leanden · PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2012 7:39 pm

Now that looks much better

smallfly · PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2012 9:59 am

Attachment:

tileset_f_32x32_v2 (more tracks)_preview.png [ 117.05 KiB | Viewed 4276 times ]

smallfly · PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2012 10:02 am

Attachment:

tileset_b_32x32_v7 (tracks)_preview.png [ 125.63 KiB | Viewed 4271 times ]

(larger version attached)

FooBar · PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2012 11:38 am

smallfly wrote:

Attachment:

tileset_f_32x32_v2 (more tracks)_preview.png

If you remove the lower right bit and move the lower left somewhat to the right, you have two eyes and a mouth :mrgreen:

smallfly · PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2012 11:54 am

Attachment:

tileset_truck_v1_preview.png [ 27.17 KiB | Viewed 4243 times ]

(larger version attached)

Drury · PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2012 12:04 pm

Why don't you use one sprite that spins around it's centre? That'd be smoother.

smallfly · PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2012 12:06 pm

Drury wrote:

Why don't you use one sprite that spins around it's centre? That'd be smoother.

For performance reasons. If the CPU has to turn thousands of vehicles it has no time left for really necessary operations.

Drury · PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2012 12:08 pm

Sounds fair enough.

Besides, wouldn't really work in isometric version.

Transport Tycoon Forums

Concept Phase Oct09-May12

Who is online