Transport Tycoon Forums

Please use 8.3 for DOS filename. DOS doesn't make sence of long file names. (Blame BILLY for this.)

athanasios wrote:Please use 8.3 for DOS filename. DOS doesn't make sence of long file names. (Blame BILLY for this.)

Updated filename + grfcrawler entry, and aswell, static support for OTTD.

The downloads for the first bridge seems missing somehow by now So here is a fix for those...

Are you aware that in the GRF window it calls your file 'Cantilever bidge renewal'?

Ben_K wrote:Are you aware that in the GRF window it calls your file 'Cantilever bidge renewal'?

Really should I release a fixed version just for that?

No.
Fix it in your next release. I also noticed it, but since it didn't affect gameplay I didn't bother about it.

Well, it has been in the last few versions... hence why Ive bought it up now

Ben_K wrote:Are you aware that in the GRF window it calls your file 'Cantilever bidge renewal'?

"bidge" have been fixed in the new version, and the colour problem with ttdpatch should be fixed now. Can someone test it please?
edit: I have checked it by myself, its gray with my ttdpatch:)

Hello thgergo, I really like your bridges!
Unfortunately I am not able to build the three shorter bridges (look at the screenshot) with newcanti11w.grf.
They got replaced after I loaded your grf ingame. I think they look perfectly fine and I wonder why it's not possible to build them.

Kolbur wrote:Hello thgergo, I really like your bridges!
Unfortunately I am not able to build the three shorter bridges (look at the screenshot) with newcanti11w.grf.
They got replaced after I loaded your grf ingame. I think they look perfectly fine and I wonder why it's not possible to build them.

Use the static version for those, the minimal length isnt defined in the static version, but you cant use it for extra-large distancles, the same properities than the original. Maybe I should drop this limited minimal length idea...

thgergo wrote:Maybe I should drop this limited minimal length idea...

YES!
Also, 2 more suggestions:
1. Add narrow gauge support to that bridge so that it will fit in with the others.
2. Combine it with the others with a parameter to turn it off for those who would rather not use it. (or to turn it on for those who want it). That way you will have only one file to maintain.

wallyweb wrote:

thgergo wrote:Maybe I should drop this limited minimal length idea...

YES!
Also, 2 more suggestions:
1. Add narrow gauge support to that bridge so that it will fit in with the others.
2. Combine it with the others with a parameter to turn it off for those who would rather not use it. (or to turn it on for those who want it). That way you will have only one file to maintain.

YES! If I only have more free time:) Anyway my primary target is the Total bridge renewal(progressing slowly in the background), when I spare with time, but ill make a more compatible of these cantilevers first.

Don't we wish we all had more time for everything?
I'll be sitting back here in the corner waiting patiently.
hmm ... Do you mind if I have a snack while I wait?
Don't forget GRFCrawler when you have something new.

Thanks thgergo.