I know it was a bad shotAmeecher wrote:I disagree.dunbrine47 wrote:Cutest dog ever.
Try these
http://picasaweb.google.com/kennelnotice
Look around and you'll find more
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fX3h1C3DobM
This should change your mind.
Moderator: General Forums Moderators
I know it was a bad shotAmeecher wrote:I disagree.dunbrine47 wrote:Cutest dog ever.
Fine if you think It's "Ugly"Purno wrote:I agree...
with Ameecher...
Horrible thing. And the next one you've posted is. It might be a good dog in terms of being technically sound with a good appearance, but it doesn't stop it being ugly.dunbrine47 wrote:Cutest dog ever.
Ok you want ugly I'll give you UGLYDave Worley wrote:Horrible thing. And the next one you've posted is. It might be a good dog in terms of being technically sound with a good appearance, but it doesn't stop it being ugly.dunbrine47 wrote:Cutest dog ever.
http://images.google.co.uk/images?hl=en ... ages&gbv=2
Take your pick of any animal there for "cute".
My wammels are posted below. Rosie's the mongrel thing, she's about 9 now. Manni's a pure-bred Rottweiler, about 5 or 6 years old.
There's nothing wrong with Terriers - they're just not pretty dogs. Especially not those terriers. I have an issue with the smaller dogs in general - I just don't think they can compare to the bigger things. It's sort of a given that I want a Newfie when I've got my own house.dunbrine47 wrote:And what does this forum have against Terriers to begin with?
That's the only time I'll ever agree with you,Terriers were never bred to be pretty,There were bred to work.Dave Worley wrote: they're just not pretty dogs.
t'is a she.Purno wrote:He's pretty cute indeed.
Aye, I thought "Juultje" (filename) came from "Jules".lobster wrote:t'is a she.Purno wrote:He's pretty cute indeed.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 47 guests