michael blunck wrote:
That´s a totally wrong insinuation. Instead, I´ve always been open to any suggestion. Do you know my inbox? Do you read the german forums? Do you read the mailing list? Did you ever noticed how many of my ideas have been taken over by other people? They couldn´t have been such restrictive or limited then ...
I've never been at the german forums, or the mailing list. All I know is that you relatively recently registered at these forums. But I apologize for this statement.
As with regard to german train vehicles, there is already a set which fulfills all reasonable wishes. In addition, v0.9 introduces again 10 new locomotives/railcars, mostly for passenger transport.
I've not seen the new DB set and I don't exaclty know which vehicles Saskia did want to include, so I guess you're right at this statement.
But don´t argue about copyright issue with me.
Nopes, it has been done before already, IIRC.
AFAIR, it was a copyright question. Hyronymus was unsure which type of copyright the NS set would be under. And I didn´t only offer to "hand over the sprites" but I offered a completely coded NS-ICE3, BTW.
Could be, can't remember exactly.
Then why do you write it without knowledge? Apart from this, it is rubbish:
I write with the knowledge I have.
- which colours aren´t correct?
- which vehicles don´t look close to the original? (What does "close" mean BTW in TTD-context?)
- which "many" important vehicles are missing?
Please do answer those questions than rather accuse me by citing years-old assertions of a third party. And please remember, that the DB set has undergone some revisions since Saskia did write those sentences. And did you notice that although my "vehicles don´t look close to the original", Saskia simply copied them? Why did she do that if they "don´t look close to the original"? (BTW, see the title: "planning & pasting"!) This is just all useless stuff.
I did not know Saskia copied stuff. I know she put some of your vehicles in the tracking table, but those are properly credited, IIRC.